This post zeroes in on exactly why the simple interop approach is important. It does so by listing a number of use cases. They illustrate the issues of getting to interoperability while an industry is in transition – and are industries ever not in transition?
We are mindful of the specific kinds of interoperability required to obtain incentive funds under the ARRA. The regulation is available at this time here. Our approach is directly applicable to all of them except ePrescribing. However our approach is also mindful of one of the main challenges of going able from being able to interoperate to actual interoperation. To make the most use out of interoperability provided to EHR vendors it will be necessary to interoperate with many healthcare organizations that don’t have EHRs. (See Rant on Heath Information Technology Asynchrony for more specifics.)
We expect the simple interop approach to handle both person-to-person communication and the automated transmission of information from one information system to another. Some examples of these two modes of communication are listed below.
- Doctor A sends a secure email to Doctor B, an attending physician at the local ED, about a complex patient who is rushing over. Docs A and B both have EHRs but there is not yet HIE in their town to connect them or they are signed up with different HIEs.
- Doc A sends the same secure email to Doc B, but Doc B does not have an EHR.
- A physician sends an email to a patient (at his health Internet address) about the patient’s case
- At the close of each encounter, an EHR automatically sends a summary to the PHR designated by the patient.
- Upon discharge a patient asks that the discharge summary to be sent to her home physician in another state; she has the physician’s health email address in her address book.
- After and ED visit for breathing difficulties a mom asks that a summary be sent to her son’s pediatrician. She is able to provide the name of the physician and the town where the pediatrician practices, but is not sure of the name of the practice. The ED staff is able to find an unambiguous entry in a health Internet 411 service but it is not clear whether the pediatrician has an EHR or not.
- Upon reading a preop treadmill ultrasound a cardiologist needs to send the report to the surgeon and the primary care provider, and to the patient. The patient and his PCP live in a rural county across a state line a different medical services region than the cardiologist and surgeon.
- A patient is brought to the ED with severe cardiovascular symptoms. The patient says he was treated six weeks ago at another hospital. The other hospitals is not connected to an HIE. The patient gives consent to get the records from the other hospital, so the local ED staff calls the hospital. Over the phone the ED gives the other hospital information to identify its healthcare email address and the records are sent from the other hospital’s EHR to the ED which adds the contents to its EHR. Some of the contents were sent as structured data including a patient summary and others of the contents were textual reports with the minimum structure necessary to identify the report with the patient and give the type of test reported.
These cases are similar in the following respects.
- Communication occurs across healthcare organizations
- It is likely that the two organizations will be at different levels of adoption of healthcare information technology.
- It is desirable to send structured data when possible
- It is desirable to send human-readable information when it is not possible
- It is tedious (in fact impossible) for one HCO to keep track of the status of another with respect to its ability to use structured data formats.
We submit that these are the real challenges of actually achieving interoperability about a lot of patients for a lot of healthcare organizations over the next four years.
Our next post, Simple Interop: The Payload describes how to exchange structured using the simple interop approach.
This blog was amended on 7 January 2010 per user comments.
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Predicts 2017: Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence is changing the way in which organizations innovate and communicate their processes, products and services. Practical...
View Relevant Webinars
The IoT In Manufacturing Operations: Where Are We Now?
The Internet of Things (IoT) is a paradigm shift for manufacturing operations. Its fanfare creates uncertainty in state-of-the-art technology...
Category: healthcare-providers interoperability vertical-industries
Tags: arra ehr health-information-exchange health-internet healthcare-interoperability healthcare-providers hie meaningful-use nhin personal-health-record phr stimulus
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.