by Tom Austin | August 8, 2010 | Comments Off on Big Red Flag — IBM’s Ed Brill suggests you not read Gartner research on Notes/Domino email
IBM’s Director, End-User Messaging and Collaboration (Ed Brill) has implicitly recommended that people not read Gartner’s research discussing clients who are asking about moving away from IBM Lotus Notes/Domino email. Why? Well, because he’s summarized the note in his blog post and determined it’s inconsequential.
I discussed Ed’s post in an earlier blog posting of my own, but realize that many readers might want some evidence of elements of our research note that Ed conveniently left out. Here’s one, emphasized in bold:
From 1 July 2009 to 30 April 2010, 116 different clients booked one or more calls with Gartner analysts seeking advice on migrating away from Notes for e-mail. … By comparison, during the same 10-month period, no Microsoft e-mail customers called us for advice on whether to migrate to Notes/Domino for e-mail, although a few considered moving or have moved to other providers, notably Google.
This market disparity is a significant factor Reread what IBM’s Brill conveniently left out. (There’s more in the research note.)
Our research is based on substantive data and very serious discussions with professionals with serious issues and concerns, not cocktail party chatter.
By the way, we’re an equal opportunity analyst firm — we call ’em like we see ’em. In this segment, for example, we go deep on all the key competitors. We take Microsoft to task over BPOS-related issues in “Make or Break Time for Microsoft Cloud E-Mail” and I personally laid into Google in this blog less than a week ago. (Behind that blog post is detailed analysis of the Google business model and what it means.) We haven’t seen either Google or Microsoft posting suggestions that people not “bother” reading Gartner research because they don’t like what we’ve written.
If you’re a Gartner client, call us with your important issues.
If you’re not a Gartner client, our Gartner sales offices can help you out. Seriously. Call them…
And if you see any vendor suggesting you need not bother reading any of our research, treat that as a big red flag!
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Top Strategic Predictions for 2018 and Beyond: Pace Yourself, for Sanity's Sake
Technology-based innovation arrives faster than most organizations can keep up with. Before one innovation is implemented, two others...
View Relevant Webinars
Channel Trends 2017: Three Activities to Focus on
Widespread digital transformation and shifting buyer expectations are placing demands on technology provider channel leaders to enhance...
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.