There’s a story behind the title of this blog
Recently, I had a discussion in regards to Microsoft’s BitLocker with a client. One of the issues I call out in my research on BitLocker is that (unlike competing third party products), Microsoft doesn’t have an option to synchronize the pre-boot PIN with the Windows login credential. In a securely deployed system leveraging the TPM, the end-user enters a PIN to unlock the drive, Windows boots and then they are prompted for their Windows credential.
Net/Net the user is prompted twice and must enter two different credentials. Competitor’s solutions for full drive encryption enable the Windows password to be synched to the preboot environment so that the credential entered to unlock the drive also logs them into Windows – a “single sign on” so to speak where one credential is entered.
Clearly, there are many enterprises that prefer the latter scenario. However, Microsoft considers the synch of of the Windows credential a potential security risk, so it doesn’t support this option.
However, many organizations licensed under Software Assurance”on the Windows OS get rights to BitLocker with the Enterprise version of Windows 7 (in other words, it appears to be “free”).
Hmmmm. What to do? End user acceptance versus security versus free.
The client had decided to implement BitLocker with no preboot authentication, thus the end-user would only be presented with the Windows login prompt.
Essentially, while the drive is technically encrypted, there are no controls on the retrieval of the encryption keys. As soon as you boot, the drive is unlocked.
So I asked them “If an encrypted drive automatically unlocks on boot with no checking of credentials, is it really encrypted?” (kinda like “if a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?”)
I explained to them that this was a grey area, and that I could not endorse the deployment of BitLocker in this way. I’m not a lawyer, but it sure seemed to me that the drive can’t be considered to be encrypted if anyone (including the bad guys, including if the device is lost or stolen) can boot it and have the drive unlock itself.
So I asked them if they had consulted with their legal counsel.
Good news — they had.
Bad news — their legal counsel took the same position I had taken. Deploying BitLocker in this way didn’t enable them to claim compliance with a requirement they had to encrypt their laptop drives.
By the way, does Windows 8 change this?
No and Yes – see this research note for clients
No – Microsoft doesn’t support the synching of Windows credentials to the preboot environment. So the same problem remains for laptop users.
Yes – For fixed device scenarios, Microsoft now supports a form of automatic network-based authentication that can be used as a form of authentication credential instead of a user-entered PIN. This works well for fixed desktops and servers encrypted with BitLocker, but requires Windows 8 and Windows Server 8.
If you’ve deployed BitLocker on Windows 7 with no preboot authentication, you might want to check with your legal counsel to get their position on whether or not this meets internal and/or regulatory requirements to encrypt hard drives.
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Predicts 2017: Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence is changing the way in which organizations innovate and communicate their processes, products and services. Practical...
View Relevant Webinars
Bring Your Own: come gestire dispositivi e app in modo sicuro?
Il trend del Bring Your Own continua a crescere, impattando sempre piu' il modo in cui le aziende devono implementare le proprie strategie...
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.