Blog post

How to Measure the Impact of Brand Advertising

By Martin Kihn | May 29, 2018 | 0 Comments

MarketingadvertisingMarketing Leadership and Strategy

My biggest surprise of 2018 (so far) is to extent to which marketers are rediscovering their “brand.” What’s going on? We can imagine existential threats from mysterious quartets, but it’s still just a rediscovery — the brand hasn’t gone anywhere. It’s always important. Which doesn’t make it any easier to quantify, sadly. What follows is a condensed version of a research note I published with the same title as this post. (Clients enjoy here.)

So What Is a Brand?

A brand can be loosely defined as a constellation of words and images associated with products, services and experiences. The point of brand messages, including advertising, is to build brand value, which is directly related to profits. A brand’s value is the premium consumers are willing to pay over a generic version of the same thing. Investing in brand advertising is a way to avoid competing only on price.

Benefits of Brand Advertising


Source: Gartner (May 2018)

Because branding’s benefits are measured over months and years (and decades), brand spend is vulnerable to being cut or shifted to short-term tactics like promotions, discounts and timed offers. A widely-cited HBR study called “If Brands Are Built Over Years, Why Are They Managed Over Quarters?” stressed the dangers of neglecting branding in favor of promotions. The authors pointed to Vlasic and Lacoste as strong brands scuttled by short-term thinking, and Nike – which spends about $1.5 billion a year on brand advertising in the U.S. – as a long-term winner.

“Companies routinely overinvest in promotions and underinvest in advertising, product development, and new forms of distribution. As a result, powerhouse brands have been weakened, often beyond recovery.” – Lodish and Mela

Many marketers are convinced that brand advertising works, yet they struggle to determine how well it works for them.

Two Dimensions of Impact

Brand advertising measurement can focus on how ads impact the business, how they impact consumers, or a combination of both. And it can use metrics that are direct or indirect. These two dimensions – business vs. consumer and direct vs. indirect – organize discussion of brand measurement.

Dimensions of Brand Ad Impact


Source: Gartner (May 2018)

Business-Centric Methods Focus on Profits

Business-centric brand valuation methods try to quantify advertising’s impact on financial metrics such as sales, profits, market share or intangible financial value. They attempt to answer the question: “What is the ROI of brand advertising?” As such, they speak the language of the CEO and CFO and are often done to support annual budget planning.

Business-centric methods are also the basis of marketing mix models that use a financial metric such as sales, profits or market share as their dependent variable. Because of their complexity and data requirements, these models are also usually annual or semi-annual efforts and not used for individual campaigns.

Business-Centric Direct

Business-centric direct methods attempt to measure the impact of brand ads on a key business metric such as sales. They use historical data and complex econometric or other regression-based models to separate brand ads from other factors that influence the outcome.

Examples include:

  • Financial valuation – discounted present value of future cash flows associated with the brand
  • Sales lift models – econometric or regression models that isolate the impact of ads
  • Baseline drivers – isolate brand’s contribution to organic sales
  • Customer value metrics – e.g., adjusted CLTV or RFM

Business-Centric Indirect

Indirect methods focus on an outcome that is known – or hypothesized – to be highly correlated with the desired financial outcome. For example, the ability to charge a higher price or to avoid lowering prices in a downturn is considered characteristic of a stronger brand.

Examples include:

  • Market share – brand vs. others’ share of wallet or profits or target market penetration
  • Price premium – degree to which brand can charge more for same product or service
  • Price elasticity – how pricing reacts to external factors

Consumer-Centric Methods Focus on Perceptions

Consumer-centric methods focus on the brands’ prospects and customers, rather than the business impact. They attempt to gauge that the impact of brand ads is on consumers’ perceptions, attitudes and intentions.

Consumer-Centric Direct

Direct methods use panels, trackers and surveys to ask consumers relevant questions about the brand and competitors. (This is a very large vendor category, and there are hundreds of credible partners.)

Examples include:

  • Ongoing panels – preexisting panels that track KPIs like awareness and perception for hundreds of brands
  • Custom panels – panels that accommodate custom questions
  • Brand trackers – traditional surveys often fielded annually or monthly
  • Custom surveys – bespoke to the brand
  • Brand impact surveys – usually conducted during or after campaigns
  • Social analytics – structured analyses of public social conversations and action

Consumer-Centric Indirect

Indirect methods of measuring consumer impact include observing behaviors known – or assumed – to correlate with long-term business impact; analyzing conversations, comments and searches related to the brand; and using voice-of-customer tools to assess impact.

Examples include:

  • Behavioral metrics – things people do on the brands’ own properties such as websites or apps around the time of a campaign (i.e., engagement)
  • Sentiment analysis – language around a campaign
  • Brand/product search – also mentioned in this mind-blowing “brand hacks” post

Combining Business-Centric and Consumer-Centric Methods

As you’ve guessed, the best approach to measuring the impact of brand advertising is to combine both methods. Most marketers already do this: running annual marketing mix models (and more frequent mini-models), alongside consumer surveys or brand trackers.

A more sophisticated approach is to develop a comprehensive picture of brand strength on financial and psychological dimensions. This can be done in two ways:

  • Proprietary method – a handful of well-known companies have built a proprietary combined method that can be customized and is useful for benchmarking and long-term assessments.
  • Multi-dimensional model – many marketing mix models incorporate brand health or equity as an input and can estimate its contribution to business success.

How do you measure your brand marketing and advertising efforts? Drop me a line below or @martykihn

The Gartner Blog Network provides an opportunity for Gartner analysts to test ideas and move research forward. Because the content posted by Gartner analysts on this site does not undergo our standard editorial review, all comments or opinions expressed hereunder are those of the individual contributors and do not represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management.

Comments are closed