Organizations face a silent crisis, one that they may not easily recognize but sense deep within their operations. This is a unique type of crisis driven by the absence rather than the presence of a threat. In this case, the crisis is management. Not in the sense that organizations have too many managers, but the observation that they do not have enough ‘real’ managers doing management.
Too many managers are not managing.
They are administrating.
Administrating in the sense that they see their responsibilities, value and future in executing prescriptive, defined and ‘optimized’ processes with the goal of eliminating variance and enhancing compliance levels. Just look at much of the work of day-to-day managers: budget meetings, reporting, coordination meetings, issues meetings, progress reports, routine job evaluations, etc. This is all work focused on administering a predefined plan or a process not in creating value or results beyond having things ‘run smoothly and according to the plan.’
Administration ≠ management
Administration is important and necessary, but when management becomes dominated by administration we undercut the value, status and importance of true management. We turn true managers from a source of enterprise adaptability, experience and energy into a cadre of clerks that we despise. Most young people do not aspire to be managers as they see the work as old fashioned, demeaning and not interesting. I think that they do not aspire to be administrators, and if you described the work of a management accurately they would say that’s for me.
The work of management, I believe, is inherently contextual, semi-structured, filled with gray areas and the need for judgment. Managers create effective organizations. They are the professionals who create adaptability based on recognizing and responding to factors that do not fit the plan. Administrators work that plan.
Adding administrator as a formal title.
One of the reasons why so many ‘managers’ are actually administrators is that we call everyone a manager. The term has become so overused that manager has lost most of its meaning. We need to recognize that there are people who manage and people who administer and start to call them by their proper names.
I believe that perhaps 80% of people who currently called managers can be renamed administrators.
Here are a few ideas for identifying administrators:
- If success is defined by conformance to plan or process, then you are probably an administrator.
- If your primary means of communication is email and formal reports, then you are probably an administrator.
- If your responsibilities revolve around managing a thing – like a database, customer list, budget, finance, a policy, product design, etc.; then you are probably an administrator.
- If managing people who report to you concentrate on inspecting and assuring the quality of their work, then you are probably an administrator.
- If solving a problem means passing it up to the next level, then you are probably an administrator.
- If change the processes, procedures and rules that govern your activities is not within your authority, then you are probably an administrator.
I am sure you can come up with other conditions and I would welcome your contributions. Applying these statements means that many of the people we call ‘managers’ are actually administrators – including people fairly high up in the organizational hierarchy.
But you can see a pattern here — administrators are tied to predefined, predetermined and predictable processes, patterns and roles. They are not asked nor expected to deviate from these structures.
Compliance is king and clearly different from the type of unstructured, contextually heavy and adaptive work required of managers.
Calling someone a manager does not make him or her a manager
Separating management from administration would be a start. It would help recognize the amount of administrative work that actually exists in our organizations and highlight the dearth of actual managers in the organization.
Recognizing administration lets us accurately measure its contribution, role and criticality in operations rather than muddling it with management or even leadership.
So lets be clear:
- Organizations are efficient when administrators do a good job of administering.
- Organizations are effective and adaptive when managers are able to do the work of management.
- Organizations are transformational when leaders work with managers and administrators who have the capability, capacity and confidence to execute their plans.
You need all three in the right amounts. But that is the subject for another blog post.
Recognizing that you probably have too many ‘managers’ who are really administrators is one step in giving a voice to the silent crisis that is building whenever the creative, collaborative, contextually heavy work of management becomes tied down, folded into and consolidated into working a predefined plan.
When that happens the accumulation of meetings, plans, reports, status and issues takes over the agenda and crowdsout the work required to drive human achievement. That is work of management and ultimately the work of leadership as well.
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Top Strategic Predictions for 2019 and Beyond: Practicality Exists Within Instability
Technology-based change is happening continuously, and most organizations struggle to see the change in advance. Continuous change can...
View Relevant Webinars
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.