I posted a write-up of “getting rid of” Nagios previously, and it’s generated a staggering number of responses by those who are attached to Nagios and have used it effectively. This has ignited a similar discussion to what you see in the Mac vs PC or *nix vs Windows discussions pervasive across the internet (complete with personal attacks, I thought we were all adults here…). Those who know me, know I’ve been there and done it in my past, and in speaking with thousands of users of monitoring tools over my time at Gartner I can share some common threads.
Many of the readers who commented on the story were managing hundreds of servers, this is typically not the size of enterprises I speak with (although sometimes we do speak with those groups). We often speaking with an enterprise or IT architect who is trying to homogenize the management of the IT landscape. This is not just servers, but applications, network devices, storage systems, and other components. If you do not treat your IT infrastructure with uniformity, the notions of industrialization and standardization are elusive.
The typical Gartner client is medium to large companies, they typically have grown through the years by organic and acquisition of other businesses. This makes their IT landscape quite diverse, and often managed in isolated groups. In the discussions with these isolated organizations, left to their own devices, have selected a wide array of tools to manage their infrastructure and applications. These tools overlap with other business units within the organization using similar or dissimilar tools. For example a client I spoke with last week had over 65 monitoring tools in place, the size of the environment was 75,000 servers, let alone a vast array of other components not in scope for phase 1. As you can imagine there was everything from Icinga, Nagios, Zabbix, Graphite, etc (on the open source front) to what we call the big-4: IBM, CA, HP, BMC, and even islands of VMware vCenter Operations Suite, Oracle Enterprise Manager, and Microsoft System Center Operations Manager. I tried to offer some prescriptive advice, but the task at hand was daunting to say the least. The CIO who created this project was responding to the massive cost of licenses and people the business was essentially wasting by not managing this centrally, and not leveraging it’s scale.
Nagios plays a big role in these organizations, often being implemented several different ways in a single enterprise. Trying to standardize the implementation is a challenge especially with most Nagios users selection various components from the open source and Nagios communities to build their personal preferred implementation. By utilizing aspects of open source the vendors who leverage Nagios, but build standardized ways of implementing and managing the footprint create a likely more successful implementation at scale. (EX: Centerity, Centreon, Groundwork, OP5, Opsview).
Additionally a common issue that is pervasive across monitoring is the over extension of the platform to do more than the core tenants of monitoring. The capture of metrics, notification of issues, and the analysis and correlation of metrics to determine root cause for problem isolation. Monitoring should not run jobs needed to operate and correct infrastructure, yet we see this happening consistently regardless of the platform. This creates lock in to the monitoring tool regardless of the vendor or technology used. When the business is forced to transform for example due to acquisition, new business demands, data center relocation, consolidation, or newer technology which enables easier management they are unable to detach the monitoring from the infrastructure or applications without extensive reverse engineering, which often times is not possible.
So I leave you with a question, how do you avoid these typical scenarios regardless of the tool in place?
The Gartner Blog Network provides an opportunity for Gartner analysts to test ideas and move research forward. Because the content posted by Gartner analysts on this site does not undergo our standard editorial review, all comments or opinions expressed hereunder are those of the individual contributors and do not represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management.
285 Comments
I agree with you. But is there any better tool than Nagios XI at this price range???
Yes, here it is: The “Open Monitoring Distribution”
http://www.consol.de/open-source-monitoring/open-monitoring-distribution-omd/
Good Question.
It is not possible imho to avoid the situation you have mentioned.
When one company takes over another one, and another one etc. Monitoring is not the question at that time. The It landscape can be completely different an fully incompatible.
Getting a homo-gene IT landscape can require a complete redesign of this IT landscape’s, and monitoring. To avoid this (monitoring) as much as possible one has to look for a system than can grow with the landscape if needed (Opsview can do this), but.. does one know in advance how far this growing goes on? We do not. Facebook started on one server, now a few years further they need thousands to run their business.
And why should infrastructure monitoring not take care of the correction of problems, as long as we are notified about those actions? In SCOM for example it is not only about monitoring your IT, but all-so about controlling it these days.
I’ll toss two simple methods that are required to get any monitoring solution to work LONG term:
1) Automation.
2) Standard configurations.
3) Community support
Automation with chef/puppet/etc. is going to be a MUST if you want a large scale, solution that scales. That includes the automation of various servers and services on those servers. SO when “Tomcat” gets deployed to a server, the automation piece automatically picks it up and adds monitoring and alerting.
Standards are required as well. A simple example is that if your “production” servers aren’t “tagged” as such in some way, it’s hard to automate and manage those servers. You can use a central management system, but often your automation solution starts taking ownership of that. For example, you’d tag a server as a “production” server, and then in your automation “all production servers get X monitoring for hardware”. But if you have “this is a one off server that’s not really production” that’s where things get nasty. And here’s the kicker – ANY monitoring solution has to have an API or easily to update configuration option.
A last piece – COMMUNITY. I’ve seen a lot of closed source solutions that have HORRIBLE community support. And instead of making monitoring easy, these teams often will setup complicated monitoring configurations that end up not keeping up with the various product releases. This is the problem with the closed source monitoring solutions I’ve seen.
An example here – MongoDB. The available monitoring tools for mongo from the community are all around for the various open source solutions (Zabbix/Nagios/Check_MK or OMD/etc. But it’s extremely difficult to find monitoring of this database in closed source solutions, because there’s no community around those solutions. If you’re core business runs on open source systems, look to open source technologies and community support. If ALL of your infrastructure is proprietary then it’s possible a closed source solution MAY work. But I’ve yet to seen an entirely closed source shop. Which means that an open source solution of some sort will almost always be easier to maintain than a closed source solution.
Hi Jonah,
The answer seems to be in your story already. Standardization.
I know standardization to be a difficult art. I know about this “beauty of standardization because you can pick any standard you like”. So for me warnings are in place, I do not take standardization lightly.
To me standardization is the art of knowing what *not* to standardize. Sometimes I see a department that matured enough to understand we need standards but sometimes those standards do more harm then good. Instead of increasing productivity they put hard breaks on it.
Is it practical to standardize everything up to the last bit if the end result is that no one has ever enough time or mental power to study all the standards before adding a metric in the correct way?
Is it practical to standardize on a worldly level or even at company level when the standards are intended to improve cooperation between a team of 5 people?
Are there not too many and not too few standards between different departments?
Whatever monitoring tools one adopts, it seems to me that the right level of standardization determines success more then what bells and whistles are included in the software.
Kind regards,
Paul Karman
Jonah,
I think what you are seeing in these companies is not just a technology problem. Although I am not well versed in all the monitoring technologies out there I can abstract a solution by asking a few questions.
Question 1
What single tool is currently available on the market that could monitor all 75,000 servers that currently are being monitored by the 65 monitoring tools?
Question 2
How much money is that company willing to spend to resolve this problem?
Question 3
Are people willing to outsource monitoring from their teams into a central team?
These three questions tackle technology, finance and people all of which are part of the problem, of which I think the last 2 are the biggest problem.
My solution is as follows:
> I would go for an open source solution and save half my budget.
> I would hire a genius with the experience and expert know how to setup a single monitoring system with maybe a distributed architecture and provide whatever output people want to see.
> I would appoint someone with great people skills to manage the outsourcing of the monitoring from the other teams and to manage business expectations whenever further functionality is needed.
I am not sure what the above might cost but what I am sure off is that it isn’t a high price to pay especially when you take the licensing costs into account and the staff time spent setting up and maintaining those systems ( new checks, upgrades, etc )
Although the above does not factor in the costs of consultants which my company will hire because they don’t trust their staff to do my job as a consequence of not being able to assess how technically able any of their them are.
Centralize it, standardise it and revolutionise it!
Nagios/Icinga is perfect for alerting.
If you want to graph stuff, use graphite.
If you want to alert on your graphs, use Skyline.
Nagios is not a “one size fits all” and I have had far too much experience of systems which promise to roll up alerting, trending and visualisation into a “one size fits all” solution to know that it’s usually “one size fits nothing”
The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
1.) Nothing works in a vacuum. Most entities running nagios are running it with other software to accomplish various things that nagios wasn’t designed to do. ( Puppet/chef for automation, Munin for a front end, etc.)
2.) The “your way sucks” mentality is very easy to have, and really not a good fit for the open source community. There are thousands of ways to do everything, and OFTEN things are done in a way to maximize the current environment. People that shout “this is always the way it’s been done” are in my top 5 classes of annoyances, but slightly behind the camp that says “this way is new, so we should do that simply because newer is better,” and way behind the people that boast. “*my* way would toatally solve ALL your problems.” (becuse it won’t, and arrogance is ugly.)
If we wanted to work in a one-way-fits-none, but-we’re-gonna-do-it-anyway world, we probably wouldn’t be working in IT.
That being said, in my experience, here’s three ways to look at solutions:
A.) How would I do it if money were no object? (Dream way..)
B.) How would I do it if I were in my garage on my own servers? (Cheap way OR most fun way OR which way would I learn more…)
C.) How would I do it if my job depended on it? (What’s the cheapest way I can do it *right*.)
Since we don’t always lie in the dream state of life, B and C are WAY more common…and the way I’d do something if I had my druthers is almost NEVER the right way to do it in my enterprise.
Fun thought to keep in mind.
Agreed on most of these counts, I’m just reflecting in my writing and research what I’ve heard more than enough times from clients. By adding lots of components and complexity into solving a basic problem (is my server healthy) we are over engineering stuff which matters less to the actual function of applications on that server. Simplify availability monitoring and focus on performance monitoring.
The real problem is that everyone wants something easy and ready to use out of the box. Windows, and the software that runs on it, does this very well. But with that, you have to put up with a lot of bloat from all the unnecessary addons and applications, as well as the parts that you might have needed which are missing. People like me who have old enough know that nothing is easy or straight forward about computers, and you can’t have it all with any system or software you write.
Nagios is a base. That’s what you are missing. Kind of like Linux itself. You build onto it with the applications and resources that fit your needs. I’ve seen enough MSP software, to tell you that nobody makes a product that will satisfy everyone, and to get one that will satisfy you without doing it yourself, won’t happen, unless you have some VERY deep pockets. My advise to anyone reading this thread, learn *nix. Get familiar with its infrastructure, and open source applications. Contribute to the opensource community when you think you’ve found something that nobody else has thought of yet. It will save you and your clients money in the long run, and that is a good thing for everyone.
I for one refuse to give the money I earn supporting my clients, to anyone else, just so I can sit on my ass and not have to do any work building my business. The way I provide support is proprietary, so my software solutions should be too. Throwing money at a problem until it goes away, is just lazy and wasteful.
Surprisingly, peoples react to this post even the guy create this have left.
There isn’t rocket science here.
To pay and forget about it, goes IBM, that’s how DoD works, but you really need a deep pocket.
Don’t want to spend a penny on it? goes for the freeware that most people using. It may not working now, but it will work in later. At the beginning, Apache does not support event-driven like Nginx, but the community made it happen.
The out of the box solution would be: hired some good guys and pay them well to keep them in the company. Who need monitoring if the server never goes problems?
Thank you for your great article
It was great, thank you
thanks
good
very nice
In order to show you the most relevant results
we have omitted some entries very
similar to the 30 already displayed.
You know what? The real problem is that everyone wants something easy and ready to use out of the box. Windows, and the software that runs on it, does this very well. But with that, you have to put up with a lot of bloat from all the unnecessary addons and applications, as well as the parts that you might have needed which are missing. People like me who have old enough know that nothing is easy or straight forward about computers, and you can’t have it all with any system or software you write.
thanks. But with that, you have to put up with a lot of bloat from all the unnecessary addons and applications, as well as the parts that you might have needed which are missing. People like me who have old enough know that nothing is easy or straight forward about computers, and you can’t have it all with any system or software you write.
great article. you have to put up with a lot of bloat from all the unnecessary addons and applications, as well as the parts that you might have needed which are missing. People like me who have old enough know that nothing is easy or straight forward about computers, and you can’t have it all with any system or software you write.
you have to put up with a lot of bloat from all the unnecessary addons and applications, as well as the parts that you might have needed which are missing. People like me who have old enough know that nothing is easy or straight forward about computers, and you can’t have it all with any system or software you write.. thanks for you great atice
good. People like me who have old enough know that nothing is easy or straight forward about computers, and you can’t have it all with any system or software you write.. thanks for you great article
thanks for you great article. great great. People like me who have old enough know that nothing is easy or straight forward about computers, and you can’t have it all with any system or software you write..
great article. thanks .The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
1.) Nothing works in a vacuum. Most entities running nagios are running it with other software to accomplish various things that nagios wasn’t designed to do. ( Puppet/chef for automation, Munin for a front end, etc.)
2.) The “your way sucks” mentality is very easy to have, and really not a good fit for the open source community. There are thousands of ways to do everything, and OFTEN things are done in a way to maximize the current environment. People that shout “this is always the way it’s been done” are in my top 5 classes of annoyances, but slightly behind the camp that says “this way is new, so we should do that simply because newer is better,” and way behind the people that boast. “*my* way would toatally solve ALL your problems.” (becuse it won’t, and arrogance is ugly.)
If we wanted to work in a one-way-fits-none, but-we’re-gonna-do-it-anyway world, we probably wouldn’t be working in IT.
That being said, in my experience, here’s three ways to look at solutions:
great article. thanks .The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
1.) Nothing works in a vacuum. Most entities running nagios are running it with other software to accomplish various things that nagios wasn’t designed to do. ( Puppet/chef for automation, Munin for a front end, etc.)
2.) The “your way sucks” mentality is very easy to have, and really not a good fit for the open source community. There are thousands of ways to do everything, and OFTEN things are done in a way to maximize the current environment. People that shout “this is always the way it’s been done” are in my top 5 classes of annoyances, but slightly behind the camp that says “this way is new, so we should do that simply because newer is better,” and way behind the people that boast. “*my* way would toatally solve ALL your problems.” (becuse it won’t, and arrogance is ugly.)
If we wanted to work in a one-way-fits-none, but-we’re-gonna-do-it-anyway world, we probably wouldn’t be working in IT.
great article. thanks .The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
1.) Nothing works in a vacuum. Most entities running nagios are running it with other software to accomplish various things that nagios wasn’t designed to do. ( Puppet/chef for automation, Munin for a front end, etc.)
2.) The “your way sucks” mentality is very easy to have, and really not a good fit for the open source community. There are thousands of ways to do everything, and OFTEN things are done in a way to maximize the current environment. People that shout “this is always the way it’s been done” are in my top 5 classes of annoyances, but slightly behind the camp that says “this way is new, so we should do that simply because newer is better,” and way behind the people that boast. “*my* way would toatally solve ALL your problems.” (becuse it won’t, and arrogance is ugly.)
great article. thanks .The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
1.) Nothing works in a vacuum. Most entities running nagios are running it with other software to accomplish various things that nagios wasn’t designed to do. ( Puppet/chef for automation, Munin for a front end, etc.)
2.) The “your way sucks” mentality is very easy to have, and really not a good fit for the open source community. There are thousands of ways to do everything, and OFTEN things are done in a way to maximize the current environment. People that shout “this is always the way it’s been done” are in my top 5 classes of annoyances, but slightly behind the camp that says “this way is new, so we should do that simply because newer is better,” and way behind the people that boast.
great article. thanks .The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
1.) Nothing works in a vacuum. Most entities running nagios are running it with other software to accomplish various things that nagios wasn’t designed to do. ( Puppet/chef for automation, Munin for a front end, etc.)
2.) The “your way sucks” mentality is very easy to have, and really not a good fit for the open source community. There are thousands of ways to do everything, and OFTEN things are done in a way to maximize the current environment. People that shout “this is always the way it’s been done” are in my top 5 classes of annoyances, but slightly behind the camp that says
great article. thanks .The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
1.) Nothing works in a vacuum. Most entities running nagios are running it with other software to accomplish various things that nagios wasn’t designed to do. ( Puppet/chef for automation, Munin for a front end, etc.)
2.) The “your way sucks” mentality is very easy to have, and really not a good fit for the open source community. There are thousands of ways to do everything, and OFTEN things are done in a way to maximize the current environment. People that shout “this is always the way it’s been done”
great article. thanks .The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
1.) Nothing works in a vacuum. Most entities running nagios are running it with other software to accomplish various things that nagios wasn’t designed to do. ( Puppet/chef for automation, Munin for a front end, etc.)
2.) The “your way sucks” mentality is very easy to have, and really not a good fit for the open source community. There are thousands of ways to do everything,
great article. thanks .The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
1.) Nothing works in a vacuum. Most entities running nagios are running it with other software to accomplish various things that nagios wasn’t designed to do. ( Puppet/chef for automation, Munin for a front end, etc.)
2.) The “your way sucks” mentality is very easy to have,
great article. thanks .The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
1.) Nothing works in a vacuum. Most entities running nagios are running it with other software to accomplish various things that nagios wasn’t designed to do. ( Puppet/chef for automation, Munin for a front end, etc.)
great article. thanks .The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
1.) Nothing works in a vacuum. Most entities running nagios are running it with other software to accomplish various things that nagios wasn’t designed to do.
great article. thanks .The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
1.) Nothing works in a vacuum. Most entities running nagios are running it with other software to
great article. thanks .The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
1.) Nothing works in a vacuum.
great article. thanks .The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
Jonah,
I think what you are seeing in these companies is not just a technology problem. Although I am not well versed in all the monitoring technologies out there I can abstract a solution by asking a few questions.
Question 1
What single tool is currently available on the market that could monitor all 75,000 servers that currently are being monitored by the 65 monitoring tools?
Question 2
How much money is that company willing to spend to resolve this problem?
Question 3
Are people willing to outsource monitoring from their teams into a central team?
These three questions tackle technology, finance and people all of which are part of the problem, of which I think the last 2 are the biggest problem.
My solution is as follows:
> I would go for an open source solution and save half my budget.
> I would hire a genius with the experience and expert know how to setup a single monitoring system with maybe a distributed architecture and provide whatever output people want to see.
> I would appoint someone with great people skills to manage the outsourcing of the monitoring from the other teams and to manage business expectations whenever further functionality is needed.
I am not sure what the above might cost but what I am sure off is that it isn’t a high price to pay especially when you take the licensing costs into account and the staff time spent setting up and maintaining those systems ( new checks, upgrades, etc )
onah,
I think what you are seeing in these companies is not just a technology problem. Although I am not well versed in all the monitoring technologies out there I can abstract a solution by asking a few questions.
Question 1
What single tool is currently available on the market that could monitor all 75,000 servers that currently are being monitored by the 65 monitoring tools?
Question 2
How much money is that company willing to spend to resolve this problem?
Question 3
Are people willing to outsource monitoring from their teams into a central team?
These three questions tackle technology, finance and people all of which are part of the problem, of which I think the last 2 are the biggest problem.
My solution is as follows:
> I would go for an open source solution and save half my budget.
> I would hire a genius with the experience and expert know how to setup a single monitoring system with maybe a distributed architecture and provide whatever output people want to see.
> I would appoint someone with great people skills to manage the outsourcing of the monitoring from the other teams and to manage business expectations whenever further functionality is needed.
I am not sure what the above might cost but what I am sure off is that it isn’t a high price to pay especially when you take the licensing costs into account
onah,
I think what you are seeing in these companies is not just a technology problem. Although I am not well versed in all the monitoring technologies out there I can abstract a solution by asking a few questions.
Question 1
What single tool is currently available on the market that could monitor all 75,000 servers that currently are being monitored by the 65 monitoring tools?
Question 2
How much money is that company willing to spend to resolve this problem?
Question 3
Are people willing to outsource monitoring from their teams into a central team?
These three questions tackle technology, finance and people all of which are part of the problem, of which I think the last 2 are the biggest problem.
My solution is as follows:
> I would go for an open source solution and save half my budget.
> I would hire a genius with the experience and expert know how to setup a single monitoring system with maybe a distributed architecture and provide whatever output people want to see.
> I would appoint someone with great people skills to manage the outsourcing of the monitoring from the other teams and to manage business expectations whenever further functionality is needed.
I am not sure what the above might cost but what I
onah,
I think what you are seeing in these companies is not just a technology problem. Although I am not well versed in all the monitoring technologies out there I can abstract a solution by asking a few questions.
Question 1
What single tool is currently available on the market that could monitor all 75,000 servers that currently are being monitored by the 65 monitoring tools?
Question 2
How much money is that company willing to spend to resolve this problem?
Question 3
Are people willing to outsource monitoring from their teams into a central team?
These three questions tackle technology, finance and people all of which are part of the problem, of which I think the last 2 are the biggest problem.
My solution is as follows:
> I would go for an open source solution and save half my budget.
> I would hire a genius with the experience and expert know how to setup a single monitoring system with maybe a distributed architecture and provide whatever output people want to see.
onah,
I think what you are seeing in these companies is not just a technology problem. Although I am not well versed in all the monitoring technologies out there I can abstract a solution by asking a few questions.
Question 1
What single tool is currently available on the market that could monitor all 75,000 servers that currently are being monitored by the 65 monitoring tools?
Question 2
How much money is that company willing to spend to resolve this problem?
Question 3
Are people willing to outsource monitoring from their teams into a central team?
These three questions tackle technology, finance and people all of which are part of the problem, of which I think the last 2 are the biggest problem.
My solution is as follows:
> I would go for an open source solution and save half my budget.
onah,
I think what you are seeing in these companies is not just a technology problem. Although I am not well versed in all the monitoring technologies out there I can abstract a solution by asking a few questions.
Question 1
What single tool is currently available on the market that could monitor all 75,000 servers that currently are being monitored by the 65 monitoring tools?
Question 2
How much money is that company willing to spend to resolve this problem?
Question 3
Are people willing to outsource monitoring from their teams into a central team?
These three questions tackle technology, finance and people all of which are part of the problem, of which I think the last 2 are the biggest problem.
onah,
I think what you are seeing in these companies is not just a technology problem. Although I am not well versed in all the monitoring technologies out there I can abstract a solution by asking a few questions.
Question 1
What single tool is currently available on the market that could monitor all 75,000 servers that currently are being monitored by the 65 monitoring tools?
Question 2
How much money is that company willing to spend to resolve this problem?
Question 3
Are people willing to outsource monitoring from their teams into a central team?
Many of the readers who commented on the story were managing hundreds of servers, this is typically not the size of enterprises I speak with (although sometimes we do speak with those groups). We often speaking with an enterprise or IT architect who is trying to homogenize the management of the IT landscape. This is not just servers, but applications, network devices, storage systems, and other components. If you do not treat your IT infrastructure with uniformity, the notions of industrialization and standardization are elusive.thanks a milion for your great article
great article but: those groups). We often speaking with an enterprise or IT architect who is trying to homogenize the management of the IT landscape. This is not just servers, but applications, network devices, storage systems, and other components. If you do not treat your IT infrastructure with uniformity, the notions of industrialization and standardization are elusive.thanks a milion for your great article
great article but: those groups). We often speaking with an enterprise or IT architect who is trying to homogenize the management of the IT landscape. This is not just servers, but applications, network devices, storage systems, and other components. If you do not treat your IT infrastructure with
Many of the readers who commented on the story were managing hundreds of servers,
Thank you for your great article. I posted a write-up of “getting rid of” Nagios previously, and it’s generated a staggering number of responses by those who are attached to Nagios and have used it effectively. This has ignited a similar discussion to what you see in the Mac vs PC or *nix vs Windows discussions pervasive across the internet (complete with personal attacks, I thought we were all adults here…). Those who know me, know I’ve been there and done it in my past, and in speaking with thousands of users of monitoring tools over my time at Gartner I can share some common threads.
Thank you for your great article. I posted a write-up of “getting rid of” Nagios previously, and it’s generated a staggering number of responses by those who are attached to Nagios and have used it effectively. This has ignited a similar discussion to what you see in the Mac vs PC or *nix vs Windows discussions pervasive across the internet (complete with personal attacks, I thought we were all adults here…)
hank you for your great article. I posted a write-up of “getting rid of” Nagios previously, and it’s generated a staggering number of responses by those who are attached to Nagios and have used it effectively. This has ignited a similar discussion to what you see in thanks bro
you for your great article. I posted a write-up of “getting rid of” Nagios previously, and it’s generated a staggering number of responses by those who are attached to Nagios
Nagios plays a big role in these organizations, often being implemented several different ways in a single enterprise. Trying to standardize the implementation is a challenge especially with most Nagios users selection various components from the open source and Nagios communities to build their personal preferred implementation. By utilizing aspects of open source the vendors who leverage Nagios, but build standardized ways of implementing and managing the footprint create a likely more successful implementation at scale. (EX: Centerity, Centreon, Groundwork, OP5, Opsview).
Additionally a common issue that is pervasive across monitoring is the over extension of the platform to do more than the core tenants of monitoring. The capture of metrics, notification of issues, and the analysis and correlation of metrics to determine root cause for problem isolation. Monitoring should not run jobs needed to operate and correct infrastructure, yet we see this
thanks for your great article.
Nagios plays a big role in these organizations, often being implemented several different ways in a single enterprise. Trying to standardize the implementation is a challenge especially with most Nagios users selection various components from the open source and Nagios communities to build their personal preferred implementation. By utilizing aspects of open source the vendors who leverage Nagios, but build standardized ways of implementing and managing the footprint create a likely more successful implementation at scale. (EX: Centerity, Centreon, Groundwork, OP5, Opsview).
Additionally a common issue that is pervasive across monitoring is the over extension of the platform to do more than the core tenants of monitoring. The capture of metrics, notification of issues, and the analysis and correlation correct infrastructure, yet we see this
thanks for your great article.
Nagios plays a big role in these organizations, often being implemented several different ways in a single enterprise. Trying to standardize the implementation is a challenge especially with most Nagios users selection various components from the open source and Nagios communities to build their personal preferred implementation. By utilizing aspects of open source the vendors who leverage Nagios, but build standardized ways of implementing and managing the footprint create a likely more successful implementation at scale. (EX: Centerity, r problem isolation. Monitoring should not run jobs needed to operate and correct infrastructure, yet we see this
thanks for your great article.
Nagios plays a big role in these organizations, often being implemented several different ways in a single enterprise. Trying to standardize the implementation is a challenge especially wrmine root cause for problem isolation. Monitoring should not run jobs needed to operate and correct infrastructure, yet we see this
thanks for your great article.
great article but: those groups). We often speaking with an enterprise or IT architect who is trying to homogenize the management of the IT landscape. This is not just servers, but applications, network devices, storage systems, and other components. If you do not treat your
thanks for your great article.
thanks for your great article..
The typical Gartner client is medium to large companies, they typically have grown through the years by organic and acquisition of other businesses. This makes their IT landscape quite diverse, and often managed in isolated groups. In the discussions with these isolated organizations, left to their own devices, have selected a wide array of tools to manage their infrastructure and applications. These tools overlap with other business units within the organization using similar or dissimilar tools. For example a client I spoke with last week had over 65 monitoring tools in place, the size of the environment was 75,000 servers, let alone a vast array of other components not in scope for phase 1
thanks for your great article..
The typical Gartner client is medium to large companies, they typically have grown through the years by organic and acquisition of other businesses. This makes their IT landscape quite diverse, and often managed in isolated groups. In the discussions with these isolated organizations, left to their own devices, have selected a wide array of tools to manage their infrastructure and applications. These tools overlap with other business units within the organization using similar or dissimilar tools.
thanks for your great article..
The typical Gartner client is medium to large companies, they typically have grown through the years by organic and acquisition of other businesses. This makes their IT landscape quite diverse, and often managed in isolated groups. In the discussions with these isolated organizations, left to their own devices, have selected a wide array of tools to manage their infrastructure and applications.
thanks for your great article..
The typical Gartner client is medium to large companies, they typically have grown through the years by organic and acquisition of other businesses. This makes their IT landscape quite diverse, and often managed in isolated groups. In the discussions with these isolated organizations,
thanks for your great article..
The typical Gartner client is medium to large companies, they typically have grown through the years by organic and acquisition of other businesses. This makes their IT landscape quite diverse,
اخبار جهانی ، بهترین و جامعترین سیستم جمع آوری
خبر فارسی و قویترین موتور جستجوی خبر و جستجوگر هوشمند خبر
اخبار جهان ، با ما از همه چیز باخبر شوید ، اخبار جهانی
who know me, know I’ve been there and done it in my past, and in speaking with thousands of
who know me, know I’ve been there and done it in my past, and in speaking
thanks for sharing
nice post
thanks for sharing
nice post
great article but: those groups). We often speaking with an enterprise or IT architect who is trying to homogenize the management of the IT landscape.
Hi hi
Thank you very much for writing and writing the professional
tanks for content
I for one refuse to give the money I earn supporting my clients, to anyone else, just so I can sit on my ass and not have to do any work building my business. The way I provide support is proprietary, so my software solutions should be too. Throwing money at a problem until it goes away, is just lazy and wasteful.
go for a simple and inexpensive monitoring tool. I hear from many Gartner clients who decide to implement open source tools based on a talented engineer on the team, but when he leaves the company no one can figure out how to safely upgrade nagios or it’s associated components (This article goes through some of what is needed to manage Nagios
tanks for nice content
فروش رزین شهماری
perfect post
thanks & good luck
tank you poste pomis
امروزه اینترنت توانسته جایگاه خود را در تجارت پیدا کند. به گونهای که اکثر تجارتها از این بستر برای فروش و معاملات یا معرفی خود استفاده میکنند. این بستر (اینترنت) حتی در اموزش هم موفق عمل کرده . به همین سبب عده زیادی برای تجارت خود از روش اینترنتی استفاده میکنند. بعضی برندها پس از ایجاد یک وب سایت با عنوان تجارت اینترنتی ویا معرفی خود تحت عنوان یک وب سایت نیاز به افزایش سئو دارند. با افزایش سئو گوگل به وب سایت اهمیت بیشتری میدهد و در نتیجه به هنگام جستجوی اینترنتی در سطح بالاتری نمایش داده میشوند.
راهکارهای زیادی برای افزایش سئو وجود دارد که یکی از آنها ایجاد بک لینک است. بهتر است اینکار به صورت حرفهای و توسط افراد متخصص صورت گیرد. سایتهای زیادی وجود دارند که بک لینک هایی از وبسایتهایی با پیج اتوریتی بالا را برای فروش میگذارند. یک از معتبرترین وب سایتها در این زمینه سون بک لینک است . این وب سایت با فروش بک لینک هایی قوی و دائمی البته با قیمتی ارزان توانسته محبوب شود.
برای خرید بک لینک ارزان و قوی به سایت سون بک لینک مراجعه کنید
hi
thank you
this content its great
اجاره انواع آپارتمان مبله و لوکس در سعادت آباد تهران
اجاره انواع جرثقیل در غرب تهران
آموزش حضوری وردپرس در تهران به صورت خصوصی
خرید انواع لوازم خانگی از برندهایی همچون ال جی، سامسونگ، بوش و … از فروشگاه از بانه
دیجیتال مارکتینگ یلدا
hi
thank you
this content its great
merci admin
Hi thanks for your very nice and content site
کاغذ دیواری قیمت ارزان
hormuz island
امنیت کدام نرده حفاظ آهنی برای پنجره و درب آکاردئونی ضد سرقت آپارتمان بیشتر است
درب آکاردئونی بهخصوص در آپارتمانهای مسکونی که امکان باز ماندن در اصلی ساختمان از سوی دیگر همسایهها دور از ذهن نیست؛ و یا به دلیل رفت وآمد زیاد ساکنین و ناآشنا بودن همسایهها با هم، امکان حضور یک غریبه در آپارتمان نیز وجود دارد؛ و در شکل بدتر عدم شناخت و همسایه بودن با آدمهای غریبه که ممکن است خودشان دردسرزا باشند، یک ضرورت است. مخصوصاً اگر مدتی کسی در خانه شما نباشد، مثلاً به مسافرت چند روزهای بروید .
طرح حفاظ های آکاردئونی از ساز آکاردئون الهام گرفته شده و نام این درب هم برگرفته از نام همین ساز است. این نوع درها را درب کشوئی (کشویی)، درب کرکره ای، تاشو و … هم مینامند .
• کمترین میزان خطا در ساخت و حرکت بسیار روان درب
• دارای ضریب امنیتی بسیار
• کلیه سوراخهای پرچ با دستگاه سمبه ماتریس زده می شود.
• سایز تسمه ها 5mm × 2Cm
• تسمه ها دارای 2 سرگرد شده پرس خورده
• استحکام بی نظیر پرچ ها
• دارای صدای بسیار کم هنگام بازو بسته کردن به نمونه های دست ساز
• رنگ کوره ای
یکی از راه ها برای محافظت از ساختمان ها و ویلا ها استفاده از حفاظ پنجره میباشد،شاید تصور مردم از این نوع حفاظ فقط میله های فلزی ساده باشد اما شرکت آهن سازه با ایده های جدید و جالب توانسته سبک و طراحی قدیمی حفاظ نرده پنجره را کامل تغییر دهد و طراحی ها به سمت لوکس ترو مدرن تر بودن حفاظ پنجره تغییر یافته و در کنار آن امنیت هم بیشتر شده است.در مورد طراحی و رنگبندی و ابعاد حفاظ هیچ گونه محدودیتی وجود ندارد بلکه تمامی طرح ها بر اساس دیزاین ساختمان و رنگبندی نمای آن دیزاین میشود .
حفاظ شاخ گوزنی
نوعی حفاظ از جنس فلز مقاوم است که بر روی دیوار ساختمان نصب می شود. با نصب حفاظ روی دیوار (نرده دیوار) با هزینه بسیار کم امنیت ساختمان را تضمین کنید. معمولا حفاظ شاخ گوزنی را با نام های دیگری مثل نرده شاخ گوزنی، حفاظ بوته ای، حفاظ دیوار،حفاظ ساختمان، حفاظ آبشاری، حفاظ آهنی، حفاظ نیزار، حفاظ دیواری، حفاظ سرنیزه ای، حفاظ لیلیوم ، حفاظ بوته خاری و محافظ شاخ گوزنی نیز می شناسند .
تماس با بزرگترین تولید کننده نرده حفاظ
09127800603
09128047694
02122503846
best site good
nice post
the best post great nice
best site best post good nice
صائلا بزرگترین تولید کننده گیت های کنترل تردد
Thank you.very nice’
The best site.!
Very good. Thanks
Very nice,
دانلود جواب ورک بوک کانون زبان ایران و دانلود سوال و سامری همه ترم ها به صورت کاملا رایگان. iliservice.ir کانال تلگرام و صفحه اینستاگرام: ili_service جواب ورک بوک pre1 کانون زبان رایگان | ورک بوک high 1 | ورک بوک advanced 1 | حل ورک بوک advanced 1 | جواب تمرین های کتاب high 1 | حل تمرین کتاب های کانون زبان ایران | جواب ورک بوک | جواب ورک بوک inter1 رایگان | جواب ورک بوک pre1 رایگان
دانلود جواب ورک بوک کانون زبان ایران و دانلود سوال و سامری همه ترم ها به صورت کاملا رایگان. iliservice.ir کانال تلگرام و صفحه اینستاگرام: ili_service جواب ورک بوک pre1 کانون زبان رایگان | ورک بوک high 1 | ورک بوک advanced 1 | حل ورک بوک advanced 1 | جواب تمرین های کتاب high 1 | حل تمرین کتاب های کانون زبان ایران | جواب ورک بوک | جواب ورک بوک inter1 رایگان | جواب ورک بوک pre1 رایگان
Thank you very much for writing and writing the professional
Thank you very much for writing and writing the professional
Thank you
Very good. Thanks
best site very good news
very good site
best site good news very nice
nice news best site tnx
The best site.!
Thanks for post…
Thanks……..
حفاظ آکاردئونی
09128700940
صنایع فلزی آهنسازان
حفاظ و نرده
I quite agree
Thank you
very nice good
I quite agree
Thank you
The best site.!
thanks
The best site.!!!!
thanks
its greats 😉
so nice
great article. thanks .The problem is not that you have an opinion on the state of Nagios vs other options, it’s that you’re basing your opinions as facts.
1.) Nothing works in a vacuum. Most entities running nagios are running it with other software to accomplish various things that nagios wasn’t designed to do. ( Puppet/chef for automation, Munin for a front end, etc.)
2.) The “your way sucks” mentality is very easy to have, and really not a good fit for the open source community. There are thousands of ways to do everything, and OFTEN things are done in a way to maximize the current environment. People that shout “this is always the way it’s been done” are in my top 5 classes of annoyances, but slightly behind the camp that says “this way is new, so we should do that simply because newer is better,” and way behind the people that boast.
یمت حفاظ شاخ شاخ گوزنی از مهمترین دلایل انتخاب و خرید یک نرده حفاظ شاخ گوزنی از سوی مصرف کننده بشمار می رود .
مشتریان نرده های حفاظ با گردش در بازار با نرده هایی حفاظی مواجه می شوند که تفاوت زیادی از لحاظ قیمت با یکدیگر دارند ،از قیمت های بسیار پایین تا گران !
عوامل اصلی موثر در قیمت تمام شده نرده حفاظ شاخ گوزنی را میتوانید در این مقاله بخوانید
بهترین نمونه کارهای حفاظ شاخ گوزنی ارائه شده سال1398 را نیز حتما مشاهده بفرمایید
عالی
بی نظیزه
حفاظ شاخ گورنی
برترین تولید کننده حفاظ شاخ گوزنی
بهترین حفاظ
Good article. Thank you
بهترین سابت برای خرید تنباکو
thanks for sharing
حفاظ شاخ گوزنی آبشاری
عالی
Thanks very nice.
Best site.
برترین حفاظ شاخ گوزنی بوته ای
Thanks for sharing
Thanks for sharingd
Thanks for sharingdsvds
Thanks for sharingdefdvfd
this is cool and nice
شهروندی ترکیه
شرکت بین المللی ترکیش لایف ارائه دهنده خدمات مهاجرت به ترکیه
هزینه ثبت شرکت چقدر است ؟
همیشه هزینه مهمترین مساله است . برای ثبت شرکت باید بدانید که در چه مواردی باید به طور قانونی هزینه پرداخت کنید. این هزینه ها ثابت نیستند و به موارد مختلفی بستگی دارند.
مواردی که لازم است برای آن هزینه پرداخت کنید شامل موارد زیر است :
تعیین نوع شرکت ( شرکتها در انواع مختلفی از قبیل : شرکت سهامی خاص ، مسئولیت محدود و غیره ثبت می شوند)
میزان سرمایه اولیه ثبت شرکت
هزینه تعیین نام برای شرکت
میزان حجم موضوع درج شده در اساس نامه
هزینه حق الثبت در اداره ثبت شرکت ها
هزینه ابطال تمبر سرمایه شرکت
کوتاه و یا طولانی بون موضوع فعالیت شرکت
مجوزی بودن یا نبودن موضوع فعالیت شرکت
هزینه پلمپ دفاتر
حق الوکاله وکیل موسسه
اینها تنها موارد عمومی هستند که باید مرحله به مرحله پیش بروید و هزینه آنرا پرداخت کنید. بعد از ثبت شرکت باید اقدام به پرداخت هزینه و دریافت روزنامه رسمی و روزنامه کثیرالانتشار کنید فیش واریزی در هر مرحله از ثبت شرکت را باید به اداره ثبت شرکتها تحویل دهید.
ضمن اینکه اگر کار ثبتی خود را به موسسات ثبت شرکت بسپارید ، کارمزد شرکت ثبت موسسه نیز به موارد فوق اضافه می گردد.
مطلب بی نهایت زیبایی است و آروزی موفقیت
متن خیلی جالبی می باشد و آرزو ی یه حال خوب
These attacks are bothering my computer a lot
Thank you very much for writing and writing the professional
تولید محتوا پروکلیک
Thanks for sharingdsvds
Thank you very much for writing and writing the professional
subscene persian subtitle
tnx for ur best website
While we generally speak of fads in terms of clothing and toys, there is also something called an institutional fad, fads that occur within serious institutions such as education
I think about it is most required for making more on this get engaged
خریدار انواع لپتاپ و پرینتر دست دوم و نو در منزل و محل کار شما حضور سریع و پرداخت نقد و کلرت به کارت در محل
خریدار پرینتر, خریدار چاپگر, خریدار لب تاب , خریدار لپتاپ
با انجام ابدومینوپلاستی دیگر نیازی نخواهد بود نگران چربی های موضعی شکم باشید. چرا که به راحتی با کمک این روش چربی ها اضافه تخلیه و ظاهر شکم به شکمی صاف و بدون چربی تبدیل می شود. معمولاً ناحیه شکم برای داشتن تناسب اندام بسیار مهم است
تیر اهن یکی از مهم ترین و اساسی ترین پروفیلهای ساختمانی است که اکثر کارخانهها و پروژههای صنعتی از تیر آهن استفاده میکنند. استانداردهایی که کارخانهها بر روال آن کار میکنند استاندارد (IPE) است.
fh ioyyh
good
این روزها پروتز باسن طرفداران زیادی پیدا کرده است که به بسیاری از خانمها کمک می کند تا اندامی زیبا و خوش فرم داشته باشند. امروزه از روش های مختلفی برای انجام فرم دهی باسن استفاده میشود که در کمترین زمان ممکن اندام ایده آل به دست می آید.
بیشتر اوقات زمانی که به یک آرایشگاه مراجعه می کنیم بعد از اتمام کار از نتیجه آن رضایت کامل را به دست نمی آوریم. این مشکل به خاطر خودمان است.
prefect news
thanks
کاشت مو روش بسیار مناسب و مفید و البته دائمی برای رفع مشکل طاسی است . افراد بسیاری را می بینیم که به دلایل مختلف دچار ریزش مو هستند و بعد از مدتی قسمتی از سر و یا کل سر با طاسی مواجه می شود.در ابتدا برای اینکه بتوان از ریزش موها جلوگیری کرد بهتر است
کاشت ریش در جوامع امروزی همه روزه مدها و لباسهای گوناگونی را در میان مردم شاهدیم که همه روزه دست خوش تغییرات می باشد.این تغییر و تحول مدها و لباسها نیز در میان آقایان نیز به صورت وافری همه روزه مشاهده میشود و افراد با تیپ ها و لباسهای مختلف سعی بر ابراز اندام و هرچه بهتر جلوه دادن خود نیز می باشند.
آمار اعتیاد بالاست. همین باعث شده تا شاهد تاسیس تعداد بالایی کمپ ترک اعتیاد در ایران باشیم. کسرت تاسیس این مراکز، به نوبهی خود هم باعث خوشحالی است، و هم جای نگرانی دارد.
Many thanks for your assistance in our project.
کارت تخفیف چیست؟
کارت تخفیف در واقع کارتی هوشمند است که مشتریان حین خرید با ارائه ی آن می توانند تا حدی از تخفیف بهره مند شوند و در واقع هزینه ی خرید خود را کاهش دهند.
ویژگی های یک کارت تخفیف خوب:
یک کارت تخفیف خوب، تخفیفات خیلی خوبی دارد.
۱) امکان استفاده ی آسان:
بیشتر کارت تخفیف هایی که از سوی فروشگاهها، صاحبان مشاغل مختلف و شرکتها به کاربران هدیه داده میشود، به راحتی قابل استفاده هستند و خریداران در خرید بعدی بدون هیچ دردسری می توانند از آن استفاده کنند.
۲) تخفیفات بهتر:
مشتریان بسیاری تمایل دارند هزینههای ناشی از خرید خود را کاهش دهند. به همین دلیل به دنبال کارتهای تخفیفی هستند که بیشترین میزان تخفیف را داشته باشد.
البته در مورد فروشگاههایی که چند شعبه دارد باید این نکته را نیز باید یادآوری کنیم که کارتهای تخفیفی طرفداران بیشتری دارند که در سایر شعب یک فروشگاه نیز قابل استفاده باشند.
از این رو کارت های تخفیفی که مربوط به یک فروشگاه خاصی هستند و در سایر شعب کارایی ندارند طرفدار چندان زیادی ندارند.
انواع کارت تخفیف:
کارت های تخفیف انواع گوناگونی دارند. کارتهای تخفیف معمولی، کارتهای تخفیف هوشمند، کارتهای تخفیف خدماتی و کارتهای تخفیف مالی رایج ترین انواع کارتهای تخفیف هستند.
۱) کارت تخفیف معمولی:
این کارت ها مثل کارت معمولی هستند که روی آنها مبلغ مشخصی نوشته شده و مشتریان با ارائهی آن، میتوانند از همان میزان تخفیف بهره مند شوند.
۲) کارت تخفیف هوشمند:
این نوع کارتهای تخفیف غالبا برای کاربران دائم و مشتریان باشگاه صادر میشود که دارای اطلاعاتی مثل مشخصات کاربر و میزان خرید اوست.
با توجه به میزان خرید کاربر، درصد تخفیف نیز تغییر مییابد.
۳) کارت تخفیف خدماتی:
این نوع کارت تخفیف شامل کارتهای تخفیف متنوعی است که شما در ازای عرضه ی آنها قادر خواهید بود از یک سری خدمات با قیمت مناسب تری استفاده کنید.
کارت تخفیف دندانپزشکی، کارتهای تخفیف استخر و … انواع رایج کارت های تخفیف میباشند.
۴) کارت تخفیف مالی:
این نوع کارتهای تخفیف غالبا مربوط به موسسات مالی است که با ارائهی آن ممکن است سود وام و یا سایر تسهیلات به نفع مشتری کم شود.
یکی از رایج ترین انواع کارتهای تخفیف مالی، کارت تخفیف ایرانیان است.
thanks for your great article..
The typical Gartner client is medium to large companies, they typically have grown through the years by organic and acquisition of other businesses. This makes their IT landscape quite diverse,
company register in England
prefect news
thanks
ثبت طرح صنعتی</
The intended recipient you have any questions about the perfeto 7 and smart wayslearning.
thanks
I agree with you. But is there any better tool than Nagios XI at this price range???
Thanks, this is rather great news!
اگر شما هم از آن دسته از افرادی هستید که به فکر پروتز فک هستید،
شاید اسم هایفوتراپی امروزه زیاد به گوشتان خورده باشد در واقع هایفوتراپی جدیدترین تکنولوژی جوانسازی صورت و گردن است
معرفی بهترین دکتر اورولوژی در تهران +لیست ده تایی_ دکتر اورولوژی کیست ؟ و در چه زمینه ای فعالیت انجام میدهد؟ دکتر ارولوژی فردی است
ساکنین آپارتمانهای منطقه شرق شهر تهران، معمولا به دنبال شرکت معتبری در زمینه تعمیر آسانسور در شرق تهران هستند.
شیراز به عنوان یکی از شهرهای بسیار بزرگ و پیشرفته در زمینه انواع جراحی های زیبایی پیشگام است.
امروزه تقاضا برای عمل جراحی بینی بیشتر شده است و خوشبختانه افزایش تبحر و مهارت جراحان باعث این امر شده است.
اعمال جراحی پلاستیک شامل اعمالی می شودکه به منظور تغییر شکل و ترمیم هریک از اعضای بدن، بدون صدمه دیدن عملکرد طبیعی عضو انجام می گیرد
ما در سئو کوک در حال آموزش سئو سایت و آموزش محتوا نویسی سایت و طراحی سایت در کرج و تهران هستیم . در سئوکوک تمامی خدمات طراحی سایت از جمله :طراحی سایت خبری،املاک،مدارس،پزشکی و نوبت دهی ،شرکتی،چندزبانه،فروشگاهی .. با بهترین و مناسب ترین قیمت در تهران و کرج ارائه می دهیم .
بازی ها و نرم افزار های هک شده بازی مود شده ساکر استار و فوتبال استریک هک شده بستگی به بروزرسانی نرم افزار ها و انتشار نرم افزارهای جدید دارد اما این آمار میتواند به روزانه بالای 30 مطلب بروزرسانی و انتشار نرم افزار جدید منجر شود که ما به همراه تیم قوی خودمون این میزان رو پوشش میدیم تا همیشه به روز باشیم.
thanks
خرید نهال از رویال نهال
خرید نهال از نهالستان طبیعت سبز
نهالستان میاندواب بهترین نهالستان ایران
نهال گردو و خرید نهال گردو در نهالستان گردو
نهال یادام و خرید نهال بادام در نهالستان بادام
نهال انگور و خرید نهال انگور در نهالستان انگور
خرید نهال از نهالستان میاندواب
بهترین نهالستان کشور بدون واسطه
خرید نهال گردو و نهال گردو
خرید نهال بادام و نهال بادام
نهالستان انگور و خرید نهال انگور
The dental discount card hamcart is excellent
Buying a customer club should be tailored to the needs of the business or organization. Note that the main purpose of the branding customer club is to bring back previous customers and expand the market
فروش سطل زباله پلاستیکی – سطل زباله اداری – سطل زباله شهری – سطل زباله پدالی انواع سطل زباله و…
دانلود جدیدترین فیلم های 2021 . دانلود فیلم احضار 3 ، دانلود فیلم هندی کرک
Arya Nahal Nursery is the largest producer and operator of seedling cultivars for planting and cultivating green space in Iran and the Middle East.
حفاظ شاخ گوزنی صنایع فلزی کوروش
خرید باشگاه مشتریان برای همه ی کسب و کار ها واجب است زیرا با داشتن باشگاه مشتریان میتوانید سود اوری بیشتر در کسب و کار خود داشته باشید
شاید اسم هایفوتراپی امروزه زیاد به گوشتان خورده باشد در واقع هایفوتراپی جدیدترین تکنولوژی جوانسازی صورت و گردن است
فرقی نمیکند ساکن کجا باشید. اگر در آپارتمان زندگی میکنید، زندگی شما با آسانسورها عجین شده است. مخصوصا در ساختمانهایی با تعداد طبقات بالا، نبود آسانسور حتی برای یک روز نیز غیرقابل تصور است.
حالت شب
جراحی بینی استخوانی به منظور رفع ایراداتی مانند رفع قوز بینی، فرم بد بینی استخوانی و حالت خمیدگی روی پل بینی انجام می شو
really revled content to see in this blog
tnk you is post very gooos
niys to very good nais
بهترین شرکت ارائه دهند انواع پوکه در تهران
very goos thaks ya
فروشگاه بزرگ ارائه دهند انواع پوکه در تهران قیمت
کنترلر آّیاری چیست و در کجاها استفاده میش شود و چطور تهیه کنیم
نها لسرا ارائه دهنده انواع نهال انگور نهال پالونیا و نهال گردو در تهران با قیمت باورنکدرنی
معرفی بهترین مقالات در باره سلامتی بدن با سایت طبیب
قبو.ل سفارشات سئو طراحی سایت و پشتیبانی سایت
خشکبار مراغه فروش انواع خشکبار در تهخران
اگر جزو آن دسته افراد هستید که عمل جراحی بینی گوشتی را انجام داده اند حتما درباره مراقبت های بعد از جراحی بینی گوشتی باید اطلاعاتی را داشته باشید تا روند درمان شما آسان تر شود
بینی گوشتی دارای پوست ضخیم و غضروف ضعیف و نازک است. روش های قدیمی جراحی تاثیر مثبتی در نتیجه عمل بینی گوشتی نداشته
به دلیل اینکه بینی در مرکز چهره قرار دارد با کوچکترین تغییر ، تمامی چهره را دستخوش تغییر میکند . با جراحی بینی میتوانید اعتماد به نفس خود را در میان دوستان و اقوام به شدت افزایش دهید
امروزه تقاضا برای عمل جراحی بینی بیشتر شده است و خوشبختانه افزایش تبحر و مهارت جراحان باعث این امر شده است. ولی طبیعی است به موازات این افزایش خطاهای حین عمل نیز بیشتر شود
عمل بینی، پرطرفدارترین نوع جراحی زیبایی در ایران است. جراحی زیبایی بینی توسط جراح زیبایی بینی صورت میگیرد. جراح بینی طی یک عمل جراحی که ممکن است
best site very good
ارائه ی خدمتی نوین درحوزه ی خدمات وفاداری مشتریان
We are in the field of producing different types and varieties of fruit trees and fruit trees, including: selling walnut seedlings, pistachio seedlings, almond seedlings, grape seedlings, peach plants, nectarines, apple seedlings, pear seedlings, seedlings We have pomegranate, transplanted seedlings and… all seedling cultivars available in the market, as well as rare seedling cultivars such as: Raspberry, Blackberry, Blueberry, Elm and نه seedlings with the license of Jihad Keshavarzi Health Certificate.
Buy seedlings from drnahal nursery
good news
از اینکه نقطه نو را به عنوان مرجع خودتان انتخاب کرده اید از شما سپاس گزاریم. هدف این مجموعه، ایجاد تغییرات بنیادی در دنیای بازی ها در ایران است.
“ما ادعایی نداریم، دنبال دوستی و تغییرات خوب هستیم”
مطمئن هستیم با حمایت شما عزیزان، در کنار سایر مجموعه های مشابه که خیلی دوستشان داریم، جای خالی بعضی نقطه ها را پر میکنیم.
تعریف «برند»
برند یا نام و نشان تجاری، وسیلهای در تجارت است که توسط آن میتوان به تفکیک محصولات، تولیدکنندگان کالا و خدمات، فروشندگان و تجار مختلف پرداخت. برند میتواند شامل نقش، تصویر، رقم، حرف، عبارت، مهر، لفاف و … باشد که برای تفکیک محصول یا تجارتی خاص از سایرین به کار میرود.
داشتن علامت تجاری مگر در مواردی که دولت الزام بگذارد، اختیاری است و طبق مقرراتِ قانون ثبت علایم و اختراعات ایران به ثبت میرسد. حق استفاده از برند منحصراً در اختیار کسی است که آن را در اداره مالکیت صنعتی ثبت کرده باشد. تخطی از این قانون موجب پیگرد قانونی و کیفری است.
so good
very nice
thats nice
register company in iran
so very nice
this is good
Thank you for your great content .
ما سعی داریم در این مقاله شما را با بهترین جراح بینی آشنا کنیم. این روزها عمل جراحی بینی به منظور زیباتر شدن بینی و تناسب آن با دیگر اجزای صورت انجام می شود.
thanks site
Thanks for this amazing post.
پرداخت هزینه های دندانپزشکی به صورت اقساطی با کارت اعتباری همکارت
انجام خدمات جراحی بینی اقساطی فقط با کارت اعتباری همکارت
انجام خدمات کاشت مو اقساطی تنها با کارت اعتباری همکارت
خرید لوازم منزل اقساطی با کارت اعتباری همکارت
خرید کل دکوراسیون منزل اقساطی فقط با کارت اعتباری همکارت
thanks for the information
نهال پالونیا چیست چه کاربری دادر
کنترل آبیاری چیست چه کاربری دارد در کجاها استفاده میشود
انواع پوکه چیست و چه کاربردی دارد در کجاه اساتفاده میوشد
پوکه چیست چه کاربردی دارد
پوکه در تهران با قیمت ارزاتن در تهراتن
سنگ پا چیست چه کاربردی دارد در کجاها سافتاده میشود
لیست معادن پوکه
تلویزیون شهری چیست چه کاربرذی دارد
تولید کننده سررسید و سررسید 1401 همچنین واردکننده مستقیم هدایای تبلیغاتی , هدایای تبلیغاتی ارزان,هدایای تبلیغاتی خلاقانه و خاص | چاپ انواع سررسید تبلیغاتی.
سینه در زیبایی اندام خانم ها نقش بسیار زیادی ایفا می کند. بهترین جراح سینه . در واقع در بین جراحی های مختلف اندام ها، جراحی سینه یکی از رایج ترین و محبوب ترین آن هاست که نمیتوان نقش مهم این قسمت را برای زیبایی اندام و افزایش اعتماد به نفس منکر شد.
اگر شما هم از آن دسته از افرادی هستید که از اندام خود ناراضی هستید، و به دنبال بهترین جراح پروتز باسن در تهران هستید، ما را تا پایان این مطلب همراهی کنید، تا شما را با بهترین پزشکان و جراحان در این حوزه آشنا کنیم.
. امروزه همه افراد به دنبال راهی برای زیباتر شدن می گردند و یکی از این راه ها جراحی زیبایی بینی است که بسیاری از افراد به این جراحی علاقه دارند و در هر سن و سالی از این جراحی استفاده می کنند.
Getting a homo-gene IT landscape can require a complete redesign of this IT landscape’s, and monitoring. To avoid this (monitoring) as much as possible one has to look for a system than can grow with the landscape if needed (Opsview can do this), but.. does one know in advance how far this growing goes on? We do not. Facebook started on one server, now a few years further they need thousands to run their business.
کفسابی با بهترین قیمت
کارشناس رسمی دادگستری
مجموعه تبلییغاتی طرح طلایی، خدمات طراحی سایت و سئو
If we wanted to work in a one-way-fits-none, but-we’re-gonna-do-it-anyway world, we probably wouldn’t be working in IT.
خرید نهال گیلاس با قیمت رقابتی و بالاترین کیفیت در نهالستان ارغوان نهال
این آزمایش برای بررسی عروق یا رگ های باریک، مسدود، بزرگ شده یا بدشکل در بیشتر قسمت های بدن از جمله مغز، قلب، شکم و پاها استفاده می شود.
ختنه آلت تناسلی به چند روش مختلف انجام می شود و در تمامی روش ها باید به پزشک متخصص برای عمل ختنه آلت تناسلی مراجعه شود تا مشکلی رخ ندهد
بهترین سال های بارداری یک زن بین ۲۵ الی ۳۰ سال می باشد و از ۳۰ سالگی به بعد میزان باروری در افراد کمتر می شود و از ۳۵ سالگی نیز این میزان با شیب سریع تری در افراد کم می شو
this the best website that i watch .
i want build a site like this.
قیمت کولر گازی ایران رادیاتور
For 5 years in a row, SocialSEO has been one of America’s fastest-growing companies, published by Inc 5000. We are your one-stop shop for SEO, SEM, Social Media, Video Production, Email, Influencer and Amazon Marketing. We put our clients first – we are not successful unless you are.
If you look at healthy skin up close, the surface appears to be regularly irregular. This means that the skin is not completely smooth like glass, but has tiny peaks around hair follicles and pores, and tiny valleys in between the peaks.”
Swisstrade® Securities Limited is the world’s number one armoured Steel Security door company with an eye on quality who provides homes, offices, banks, hotel, government and non-governmental parastatals with standing out and suitable armoured steel insulated doors of high Quality.
تنها مساله مهم برای هر تصمیم گیرندهای، پنل پیامکی ارزان باشد اما سوال مهمتر این است که یک سفارش پنل پیامک خوب در مقابل هزینه دریافت شده، چه خدماتی را و با چه سطح کیفیتی به ما ارائه میدهد.
مخصوصاً اگر قصد دارید یک برنامه طولانی مدت برای بازاریابی پیامکی خود داشته باشید. بنابراین لازم است ویژگیهای یک سامانه پیامک خوب را به درستی بشناسید.
thanks
very good
دكتر داود محمديان روشن چندين مقاله در سايت ها و مجلات معتبربه ثبت رسانيده اند. دكتر داود محمديان روشن دارنده اولين طرح تحقيقاتي در جهان در مورد تزريق چربي به فوليكول هاي اسكالپ مي باشد. مهارت ايشان د رهر ٣ نوع بيني هاي استخواني و گوشتي و ترميمي تحسين بسياري از اساتيدخويش را نيز برانگيخته است. ايشان بنيان گذار چندين روش براي جراحي بيني هاي گوشتي با پوست ضخيم با تكتيك از بين بردن حافظه پوست ميباشند ،از ايشان ميتوان يكي از بهترين جراحان بيني درتهران نام برد.
Good Question
nice
nice post
Thank you for your good article
Instant Company provides you with social media services such as Instagram or other social media. Buy and sell accounts, like and follower services and any services you want. insta-nt.com at your service
Thank you for your comments and for your role in creating a safe and dynamic online environment
Thank you for your good site
GREAT POST, APPRECIATE YOUR TIME
your site is best
It was great
Crawlmyline is a one-stop white label provider for agencies with a track record of increasing traffic, online visibility, and conversions for innumerable websites through keyword research, link building, and on-page. Contact us now for White label SEO services today!