John Henry was on the right hand,
But that steam drill was on the left;
“Before your steam drill beats me down,
Hammer my fool self to death,
Lord, I’ll hammer my fool self to death.”
John Henry Blues
I guess we all now know how railroad workers felt in the late 1800’s when the steam drill came along, and how chess players felt in the late 1900’s when IBM’s Deep Blue computer beat grandmaster Garry Kasparov in chess: IBM’s Watson just beat the grandmasters of Jeopardy.
In an earlier post, I noted: “A Computer Can Play “Jeopardy” But Can’t Keep Users Out of Jeopardy” – I’m sure we will see all kinds of projections of how Watson-like technology can solve all kinds of security problems. However, I bet that when Watson sat down to read all the incoming email after its victory, it likely clicked on a number of phishing emails and gave away its username and password, thinking this time PayPal really did need that information.
Computers are really good at closed set problems and way faster than humans at closed set problems when the size of the closed set is really, really, really large – like a chess game or the answers to Jeopardy questions. But fraud is really a totally open set problem, for one thing. For another, the compute power available to create new attacks will always be equal to or greater than the compute power available at the target to protect against an attack.
So, it took about 14 years for computers to go from abending when trying to beat a human at Tic Tac Toe to beating humans at chess. Then it took another 14 years for software to beat our best Jeopardy players. I’d say it will be at least 14 years before computers will win a phishing kind of Turing test. Of course, by 2025 quantum computing will mean all bets are off anyway.
By the way, a mere 81 years ago today, a cow flew on an airplane for the first time.
View Free, Relevant Gartner Research
Gartner's research helps you cut through the complexity and deliver the knowledge you need to make the right decisions quickly, and with confidence.Read Free Gartner Research
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.