Last week saw fevered speculation about an impending acquisition of Twitter by Google, and just as much fervent debunking of those rumours. I don’t pretend to have any inside information, so I won’t comment on whether this will happen or not. We don’t like commenting on rumours anyway. But I do have some ideas about why such a move could make sense, and what it would mean if it does or does not happen.
Up to now, Twitter has chosen not to put much effort into developing business models. Like Google did before it, Twitter is building out its platform and attracting users. With a fair amount of VC money in the bank, it can afford to take its time. Twitter does indeed have value, even if it is not what most people think it is. Premium user accounts aren’t the answer. That wouldn’t bring in much money, potentially alienate users and reduce traffic. That last risk is why Twitter shouldn’t go that route.
As I said in my last blog posting, Twitter’s value is in its content, not the client. The Twitterbase is growing by 6 million tweets per day. Twitter is attractive because it has built a service which attracts this much volume, creating a constantly growing, twitching, seething real time source of comments, news and opinions. Companies will be willing to pay for better access to this information for lots of reasons. Consumer products companies can track attitudes toward their brands and their competitors. Media groups can use it to track real time public opinion. Governments can use it to follow what citizens are doing and thinking. Access to this data and the services to analyse it is where Twitter’s business model lies.
Even though Twitter can build out a business model, I don’t necessarily think it should. This is a good time for Twitter to sell itself to somebody. Media hype is pretty high now, with celebrities regularly talking about how they tweet on talk shows instead of promoting their latest film. It is unlikely to get much more intense than it is now. While building a business is possible, it will be a long hard slog for Twitter to monetize its assets on its own.
Google would be a good candidate. The culture and ambitions of the companies match. The Twitter founders sold Blogger to Google earlier and work on the same principles of build first, monetize later. An acquisition plays to Google’s strengths in terms of infrastructure and monetizing analysis of large amounts of data. Google knows how to run highly scalable applications, and make money doing it. Google is not the only company that would benefit from a tie-up with Twitter, but it certainly looks like a good candidate.
Other tie-ups between Google and Twitter short of an outright acquisition could make sense, but would be harder to sustain since Twitter already uses such open interfaces. it would be hard for Twitter to offer Google better access to its data than any of its other partners if Google is just another partner. That rich API has been instrumental in building the healthy ecosystem of clients and analysis services that make Twitter so much fun.
In the end, of course they will do what they think is best for their companies and shareholders. Judging by the lack of noise in the blogosphere, it looks now like “Twoogle” will not happen (but that might have changed by the time I post this).Either way, it will be fun to watch.
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.