Gartner Blog Network

The Glazer Gotta Equation: How enterprises evaluate their concerns about social tools

by Ian Glazer  |  August 3, 2010  |  1 Comment

Last week at Catalyst North America, Mike G and I unveiled our only-slightly-ridiculous Glazer Gotta Equation. This equation describes the factors that an enterprise evaluates during its consideration to deploy social tools. The factors are:

  • Control over the service
  • Location of the data
  • Sensitivity of the data
  • Age of data
  • Location of the person
  • Time

Control over the service

When it comes to control, there’s a big difference if the social tool is deployed and maintained by a central IT team (such as an internally hosted Sharepoint MySites deployment) versus a tool hosted by a 3rd party offered to the public (such as Yammer).

Location of the data

Not surprisingly where the data is stored is a huge consideration. Having data shared by employees in the EU stored in the US versus having data shared by employees all over the world stored in a data center in Singapore makes a big difference to enterprises considering their legal requirements.

Sensitivity of the data

If the social tool is going to be used for talent management and location, it is a safe bet that the sensitivity of the data will be less (typically speaking) than if the tool is going to be used as collaborative one on financial or health data.

Age of data

“The email from three years old never saves you,” ┬ásaid Mike. The burdens of eDiscovery has enterprises asking for an ability to forget. That blog post from 4 years ago from an exec mentioning a set of options the enterprise could have taken to prevent a customer issue, but didn’t, that one isn’t going to help during a class action suit.

Location of the person

Given the rich tapestry of legal requirements tied to specific geographies, knowing and fully considering the locations from where people will be using a social tool is critical. People often think US versus EU in this regard, but that is becoming increasingly too granular. Start thinking Massachusetts versus Alabama.


Because regulatory and legal obligations change over time, the enterprise has to consider the previous 5 items over a time period. Not only does this require the input of counsel, but also legislative affairs to provide some forward looking insight into upcoming changes to the regulatory landscape.

Put all these factors together and the equation looks like this:

The Glazer Gotta Equation

This equation is meant to be a bit of a light-hearted way of illustrating the concerns that enterprises have with respect to social tools. One of the clear lessons of the Glazer Gotta Equation is that enterprise decisions are never final – changes in the law and changes in service location can re-open decisions to deploy social tools. Enterprise teams have to have the stamina to examine all of the factors in the Equation and do so on an on-going basis if there is hope to derive real value from social tools.

Additional Resources

View Free, Relevant Gartner Research

Gartner's research helps you cut through the complexity and deliver the knowledge you need to make the right decisions quickly, and with confidence.

Read Free Gartner Research

Category: privacy  

Tags: identity  privacy  social-media  socmed  

Ian Glazer
Research Vice President and Agenda Manager
4 years at Gartner
16 years IT industry

Ian Glazer is a research vice president and agenda manager on the Identity and Privacy Strategies team. He leads IdPS' coverage for authorization and privacy. Topics within these two main areas include externalized authorization management, XACML, federated authorization, privacy by design, and privacy programs. Read Full Bio

Thoughts on The Glazer Gotta Equation: How enterprises evaluate their concerns about social tools

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ian Glazer, Jonathan Sander. Jonathan Sander said: must read=> RT @iglazer: New Post: The Glazer Gotta Equation on enterprise social media concerns @mikegotta #cat10 […]

Comments are closed

Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.