“No one ever got fired for buying IBM” is a phrase we’ve all heard. Today, that might change to a variety of other leading vendors. It’s often the legitimate reason that newer vendors bring up when talking about their growth challenges. Effectively many organizations have a risk bias when it comes to projects—-they prefer the safer route, even if the rewards may not be as great. This may be an even bigger issue with the continued growth in consensus buying.
My colleague, John Lovelock, and I explore this in a new research report available to Gartner clients, “Tech Go-to-Market: New B2B Disruptors Must Focus Go-to-Market Efforts to Fight Risk Biases.” In the report we look at enterprise preferences. The finding illustrate that even for emerging technologies, enterprises, by and large, have a strong preference for “older established vendors” vs. “newer, disruptive vendors.”
While not completely surprising, the application of what I’m calling the risk bias to emerging technologies is somewhat concerning. Every technology vendor innovates, but breakthrough innovations usually come from new vendors. Larger vendors often employ fast follower strategies. Enterprises that wait for the capabilities from proven vendors may find themselves acquiring new technologies just to keep up with competitors.
There is some interesting correlations between multiple areas of Gartner research here. First, our research into enterprise personalities shows how enterprise attitudes impact their technology preferences. As we continue to explore these lines, we find that organizations that are more open to dynamic technologies are, no surprise, much farther along on their progress toward digital transformation than others. Those same type of organizations also report that they are much more likely to be outperforming their competition.
And, in the research sited above, we see that those same type of organizations, while still having an established vendor preference, are more likely to be open to working with newer vendors. They will take risks if they can gain advantage.
What does this mean for newer vendors that feel they have disruptive products or that leverage disruptive technologies? First, recognize the risk bias. Look to gain traction with smaller pilot projects that reduce the risk for the customer. Also, target larger companies for these pilots. Our research shows that midsize and smaller companies have a bigger preference for established vendors—the risk of failure has a bigger impact on them. (One exception to this: Consider targeting other innovative firms that are like you. They’ll be more open to working with a company that is similar to themselves.)
And finally, as you qualify opportunities, assess the personality of the organization to determine their openness to working with newer vendors. Or will you be put through an arduous vendor management/assessment process just to get things going.
Risk of project failure is a very real concern and a big challenge for vendors to overcome, don’t ignore it in your go-to-market efforts.
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Top Strategic Predictions for 2019 and Beyond: Practicality Exists Within Instability
Technology-based change is happening continuously, and most organizations struggle to see the change in advance. Continuous change can...
View Relevant Webinars
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.