We live in times in which everything is a transaction, a contract, a sale. We learn to “sell” our ideas. We call something the “money” slide, when it represents the core of the matter.
But is it the core of the matter? Is everything for sale? Aren’t there many things of which the value disappears when you try to buy it? To use the title of an excellent book by prof. Michael Sandel of Harvard University: are there moral limits to markets?
This year I moved with my family to the US for a few years. The support we have gotten from my employer (Gartner), the school, the neighbourhood, and our landlord has been invaluable. You can’t put a dollar-sign on it. We feel blessed with where we are and how we got there.
But we also notice a few other things… The price of things, like a cup of coffee, or the price of gas, seems to depend on what neighbourhood you live, instead of the product or service that is delivered. Does then the product have value, or does only the neighbourhood have value?
On a larger scale, in the field of technology and society (the #digitalsociety), net neutrality is currently under discussion. The argument is that as a consumer you are not happy with how your provider services you, you just go somewhere else. The hand of the market doing its job. But is there intrinsic value to net neutrality?
Here’s the point: what is the one thing that is core to digital technology, and the #digitalsociety: being connected. While we are all busy working on our digital business case, it is easy to forget that being connected essentially is not a business model, but a human necessity. We are simply social beings. Paradoxically that makes connectivity the basis of every successful business model, and at the same time beyond the reach of any business model altogether.
I recently listened to a show of Tim Fransen, a Dutch philosopher and comedian. He made some excellent points, discussing the topic of “hugs”. Loosely translated:
“A hug is given, and received at the same time. There is no way of giving one, without getting one. There is also no such thing as a parasitic hug. That you try to get just a little bit more hug, than you give. It leads to less hug for both. A hug doesn’t allow itself to be reduced to a transaction.
Let’s assume I will give you $10. And you give me $10 in return. We might as well not have conducted that transactions, as we can cross it out. But if I give you a hug, and in the process you give me one, it doesn’t work that way. Only when a hug is both given and received, there is such a thing as a hug. And if I send an invoice afterwards, the value of the hug is eroded.”
For those of you who have followed my research on digital connectivism and #digitalsociety, this probably won’t be a surprise. My wish for everybody in 2018 is deeply human in nature: connect! But place a little emphasis on the analog side of it. Hug. Not because you have to, but because you can. And may.
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Top Strategic Predictions for 2018 and Beyond: Pace Yourself, for Sanity's Sake
Technology-based innovation arrives faster than most organizations can keep up with. Before one innovation is implemented, two others...
View Relevant Webinars
Channel Trends 2017: Three Activities to Focus on
Widespread digital transformation and shifting buyer expectations are placing demands on technology provider channel leaders to enhance...
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.