For the last 20 years certain professional societies have stressed the importance of every organization understanding the value of project management. Apparently the theory was that organizations needed to already believe in the value project management before a PM could actually deliver value. The concept of believe first, see value later is coming under attack in IT. Many organizations are embracing the notion that a scrum master can provide all of the value of a PM with virtually none of the paperwork. Of course this isn’t true but if we aren’t careful about how we as PM professionals respond to this challenge there is a real possibility of the baby getting thrown out with the bathwater if we aren’t careful.
With this situation in mind I’d like to suggest that there are two things we as a global community need to start doing immediately.
The first is to reject the myth that organizations need to embrace the value of project management for its own sake. All organizations already embrace the concept of leadership in achieving results. For whatever reason we seemed to have missed the power of this assumption. I was once speaking with a CEO about why he might want to invest in hiring some PMs since by doing so they could provide him with real time decision making in order to get things done. Upon hearing this he excitedly turned to the CIO and said “Now that’s the kind of person I do want you to hire, not whatever else you were talking about.”
I freely admit I’ve never understood the need to sell PM. It’s a disciplined approach to getting complex and risky work done. There are lots of group processes to ensure that everyone is marching in the same direction and there are real time practices that deal with when to apply “control” to keep things going along a planned course of action and when to embrace “change” and tack the sales to keep the project on course. The value of project management is measured by results. The practices of project management either helps the team and the stakeholders achieve those results or they are just bureaucratic wastes of time.
The second is to practice the discipline of project management quietly. Our “back office” practices should stay in the back office. Either a schedule is necessary or it’s not. Either a definition of scope is necessary or it’s not. If we, individually, can’t discuss with clarity the reason why collectively thinking through how we are going to manage an important piece of work that will cost a lot of money – then maybe we’re the wrong person to lead the team. The paperwork and the process has never been the focus of real project management. To be blunt 90% of it is CYA and bureaucracy, and neither of those practices are capable of moving at digital speed.
If anything I’ve written here sounds difficult to do or harsh in its tone given your current circumstance then please don’t take it as criticism. Take it instead as a warning that things are changing and consider what you can do to get ahead of the curve.
One concrete thing you can do immediately is go listen to Mike Hanford’s webinar on “Where Your PPM Career Won’t Be in 2020”. A second concrete step is plan on joining us in Orlando or London for the 2017 PPM Summit. While we are still finalizing the agenda for next year we anticipate the focus will be on the evolution of PPM in the digital age.
In the meantime I invite you to participate in the dialogue by leaving a comment.
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.