Late on Sunday, December 3, CVS Health, which has three stores within about a two-mile radius of my apartment in NY (this information is germane, trust me), officially announced its intent to acquire health insurance provider Aetna for $69B. This deal had been talked about form some time, particularly in the wake of Amazon’s acquisition of Whole Foods five months ago.
“Wait a minute,” you say. “What does Amazon have to do with THIS mega-deal?”
Upon the announcement of the Whole Foods acquisition, a variety of stocks immediately declined. One of those sectors was retail pharmacies/drugstores like CVS Health. Why? If Amazon could so easily and brazenly snap up a last mile distribution point like Whole Foods, thus providing consumers with a wide variety of ways to order and obtain stuff (in this case, mostly food), what would stop them from disrupting a market like retail pharmacy? And make no mistake – while Amazon was/is obviously intently interested in the internet grocery shopping/delivery market, owning a last mile delivery/pick up point (i.e, Whole Foods’ stores) is not only still critical to a lot of grocery shopping (customers often like to see, touch, and feel perishables), it provides a way to offer an omnichannel experience for anything else consumers buy from Amazon. Products available from a pharmacy could easily fit in this as well. Back to that “three stores in a two-mile radius” thought, CVS has significant presence throughout the United States (which you can see here), and its stores, pharmacists, employees, and infrastructure provide it with a significant ability to reach and interact with consumers on a personal level.
And so, notwithstanding the ever changing backdrop of healthcare and insurance in the United States, CVS Health’s acquisition of Aetna makes sense as both a defensive AND offensive willful disruption play. The direct path offered from health plan to in-store pickup/personal care will enable the combined CVS/Aetna organization to (hopefully) streamline certain processes, offer new electronic health maintenance pathways and services, and create an omnichannel experience for the consumer. It provides CVS Health with a defensive “back end” business while it offers that business (Aetna) a defensive distribution and interaction mechanism. Of course, this is all subject to regulatory approval (which, given the government’s stance on AT&T/Time Warner, may not be all that predictable), but assuming that happens, the CVS/Aetna combination will certainly have created some “insurance” for CVS against an Amazon incursion while doing some of the same for Aetna’s healthcare/insurance business relative to its competition.
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Managing Risk and Security at the Speed of Digital Business
Digital business challenges the basic principles of information risk and security management. Risk and security leaders must understand...
View Relevant Webinars
Channel Trends 2017: Three Activities to Focus on
Widespread digital transformation and shifting buyer expectations are placing demands on technology provider channel leaders to enhance...
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.