A few weeks ago I posted a quick one-question survey on DLP. I asked “Can Data Loss Prevention (DLP) technology be effective against the “bad guys” [= anybody with malicious intent, whether insider or outsider], threatening your organization?”
Here is what came out:
Comments? Well, while my language inside the answer options was intentionally fuzzy, we can try to stratify the responses in buckets like:
- DLP optimists – the “it just works” crowd – measure at 6%. This makes sense, our industry is rather short of optimists and for lots of good reasons…
- DLP “positive realists” – a combination of the above with “work hard – get a DLP WIN” – clocks at 20.9%. This is reasonable, and matches our research on DLP project success.
- DLP skeptics – a combination of “no” and “never efficient” – comes at 37.3%, a very large group indeed.
- Similarly, another kind of a DLP skeptic – a combinaton of “no” and “works only against unsophisticated threat” – measure at 43.3%, nearly half of the total. This is roughly what I’d call a majority opinion on DLP. Further, if you add “never efficient” to it, the subtotal jumps to 64.2% (2/3 of the respondents!)
- “DLP deniers” – those who say that it just cannot work – measure at 16.4% of the total.
There you have it – have fun with it! More one-question polls coming soon.
Possibly related blog posts:
- DLP Without DLP!?
- DLP Webinar Questions – Answered!
- Upcoming Gartner Webinar: DLP Architecture and Operational Processes
- My Second DLP Paper Publishes
- My First DLP Paper Publishes
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.