The short answer is, no.
In a recent client meeting where we were discussing a collaborative environment specifically for developing and rating ideas. One of the meeting attendees said something to the effect of, “Why are we creating another collaborative environment? We should just be using the one we have.”
We need to recognize that collaboration is not a “one size fits all.” It sounds great to have one environment where everyone goes to collaborate but it isn’t reality. Not all collaboration is created equally. There are different “purposes” for collaboration that require different styles. Look at social mediatechnologies for instance. We have social networking, collaborative authoring (e.g., wikis), answer marketplaces, prediction markets, social ratings, idea engines, crowdsourcing, etc. All have different collaborative “styles” that require a different participant experience, functionality, social incentives, gamification, seeding options, etc.
I could just as easily ask, “Why can’t we just have one ERP application?” Or “Do we really need a World Wide Web. Can’t we just have one Web site?” How about, “We don’t need Wikipedia. Let’s all just build an on-line encyclopedia on Facebook.” For some reason many people seem to apply this “one size fits all” mentality only to collaborative environments. It seems silly when you apply it to other computing genres.
Facebook is a good example from the social Web. I see organizations with grand plans for what they want to do on Facebook. But they forget the basic purpose of Facebook is for people to easily collaborate with a group of “friends.” If you expect to substantially depart from that purpose then your chances of success are minimal. Why? Because that is what Facebook is built for and why people are there. And if Facebook itself tries to expand too much from that original purpose it runs the risk of alienating its current base and overwhelming new users.
I’m not saying that we need to have 100 different collaborative environments. I am saying that we need to expect more than one and that we need to effectively manage an ecosystem of collaboration capabilities depending on the needs of the organization. There will most likely be a mix of general and specific collaborative environments.
What do you see? Do you see this “one size fits all” collaboration mentality? If so, how do you deal with it? Or do you have a counter to my stance?
I co-authored a book "The Social Organization" on Amazon.com. Check it out!
View Free, Relevant Gartner Research
Gartner's research helps you cut through the complexity and deliver the knowledge you need to make the right decisions quickly, and with confidence.Read Free Gartner Research
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.