Many of you may have heard of the new business craze around Design Thinking (DT). A few business books deeply address the concepts.
- “Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation,” by Tim Brown, published by HarperCollins, 2009
- “Design Thinking: Integrating Innovation, Customer Experience, and Brand Value” by Thomas Lockwood
- “The Game-Changer: How You Can Drive Revenue and Profit Growth With Innovation,” by A. G. Lafley and Ram Charan, published by Crown Business, 2008
- “The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage” by Roger L. Martin
One interesting thing about this C-Suite level craze is that it has barely penetrated IT.
Enterprise Architecture analysts Nick Gall and David Newman are driving new Gartner research around applying DT to IT in their research around Hybrid Thinking. Recently published research includes:
- Introducing Hybrid Thinking for Transformation, Innovation and Strategy
- Gain a Foundation in Design Thinking to Apply Gartner’s Hybrid Thinking Research
Gartner’s choice of the term “hybrid thinking” over “design thinking” was inspired by the article “Forget Design Thinking and Try Hybrid Thinking,” by Dev Patnaik (see www.fastcompany.com/blog/dev-patnaik/innovation/forget-design-thinking-and-try-hybrid-thinking ). Patnaik makes the case that hybrid thinking is a more accurate term for this emerging business discipline because many of the leading practitioners were actually not formally trained as “designers.” Gartner concurs. The term “design thinking” posits only one type of thinking — that of a professionally trained designer — as the key to success.
Gartner defines the essential concept of hybrid thinking (HT) as follows:
“Hybrid thinking integrates design thinking with other ways of thinking to produce successful outcomes to wicked problems by co-creating more meaningful, human-centered experiences.”
Another way to view this is that HT=DT+X1T+X2T+X3T to address wicked problem Y. Where XnT are additional and different ways of thinking.
This approach embodies some key principles:
- Wicked problems require multiple cross disciplinary ways of thinking
- A particular wicked problem can require a fundamental combination of ways of thinking to reach a desired outcome
- DT is a foundational way of thinking but it is not enough
- The result of HT is a integrative set of principles derived from multiple ways of thinking for application to a wicked problem.
We are very excited about the promise of this research and will be solidifying these concepts in practicality over the coming months of 2010.
Specifically, we will address the wicked problems facing enterprise architects and how HT can lead to desirable outcomes.
What do you think?
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.