I came up with this idea a few weeks ago. As usual, I was doing call after call on one of those busy days when it became clear to me that I was saying the same thing over and over again. Not exactly the same thing of course, but I spotted a pattern. I came up with a phrase to encapsulate the idea: “13 minutes a week – that is how much work your data stewards should be doing”.
There are so many organizations worrying about “information governance”. Some focus on the “death of data” in that they try to build processes and system to manage data that is no longer part of day to day business/operations, but it needs to be mined and accessed (potentially) much later. The sexier part of information governance is focused on what I might call the “birth of data” and “living data”. That is, the origination and authorship of data in our line of business systems and how it is used very day across those systems. That is the focus of Master Data Management (MDM) and its newer cousin, Master Content Management (applying IG to CM).
During all the MDM hype a significant number of inquiries have come in that focus on the work of the data steward. And I mean more precisely the stewards’ role in the business, not inside the IT organization. This means the marketing person, the supply chain person, the legal secretary, the warehouse manager, who has to solve a problem related to data that impacts their business outcome or performance. That is the essence of information (or data) stewardship. It is NOT about “data entry”. It is about “chief information problem solver”.
If we collectively (that means you and me) design data stewardship processes that take 8 hours a week, we will be laughed off the stage. No business person would sign up for that; worse, we should not think that is even a reasonable request. It might be that we have a lot of “data quality work” to get our data in a ship shape fashion, but that work is not “data stewardship” work data to day. That would be upfront preparation for the implementation.
So I came up with this idea: We should design information stewardship processes, and sell that work, as if it resulted in “13 minutes a week of work”. No one can predict when that work needs to be done; it is meant to be on an exception basis. That business users would do this work as ordinarily as they do their work today – this IS part of what they do (it is not different, or additional). In fact, before this whole effort, too many users did exactly this, and trod on each other’s toes!
So that’s the message for the week: Information stewardship should be perceived as “13 minutes of work a week”. For your organization it might 10 minutes; it could be 24 minutes. But please, let’s keep this stuff in focus. Anything outside these small numbers means we are not thinking straight about what it is we are trying to do with information governance.
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Top Strategic Predictions for 2019 and Beyond: Practicality Exists Within Instability
Technology-based change is happening continuously, and most organizations struggle to see the change in advance. Continuous change can...
View Relevant Webinars
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.