There are certain terms in networking that are widely over-used, we’ve all heard them: transformation, innovation, software-defined, dynamic, integrated, zero touch provisioning (if you have to physically install something, by definition, isn’t that touch?)… In many regards these terms mean nothing (but also everything at the same time). In fact, I have a half-written blog on that topic, but I digress… Thus, it was a pleasure coming across a research note from my colleague Ron Blair on broader IT strategies, stating:
I&O leaders find that the inconsistent usage of buzzwords like “transformation,” “optimization” and “modernization” across the organization is counterproductive to understanding how they can best contribute, let alone help identify what investments are required
This was part of a research report he recently published called Seven Deadly Sins of I&O Cost Optimization and Transformational Investment.
Side Note 1 – Ron may edge me out for boldest Gartner title of the year with that one, compared to How to Avoid the Biggest Ripoff in Networking (paywall).
Side Note 2 – Yes, I realize the irony that transformation is in the research title, but stay with me here… because, in fact, deadly sin #1 is the Transformational Trap:
One person’s idea of IT transformation is often unnoticed by the consumers of the service, or it’s looked upon merely as a nice-to-have equipment upgrade. What is considered transformational to I&O — or transformational in terms of the services that I&O provides to application teams and business units (BUs) — is not always transformational to the company. It is important to clearly define what is truly transformational, versus a different way to provide what is already provided today in merely a more efficient manner.
From an I&O perspective, “transformation” can mean a lot of things — One person’s transformation is another person’s incremental upgrade. This definitely extends into networking because 95% of the time we hear a network vendor say the word transformation, it simply isn’t transformational.
The research lists the 7 deadliest sins when creating I&O strategies and/or transformation plans, which include (in addition to transformation trap): Bad Strategy, Having Responsibility for IT Demand With No Chargeback Model, Business Case Blunders, Siloed Suboptimization, A Nonactionable Approach, and “Think” Versus “Know” Results. The research note also identifies actionable ways who to overcome these sins.
Summary: The proliferation of cloud, software-defined and on-premises I&O options makes investment decisions challenging. I&O leaders need to avoid “seven deadly sins” in order to capture efficiency gains and produce strategic, outcome-driven results.
Andrew & Ron
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
100 Data and Analytics Predictions Through 2021
Over the next few years, data and analytics programs will become even more mission-critical throughout the business and across industries....
View Relevant Webinars
Digital Business Architecture: From Strategy to Guiding Execution
New techniques have emerged to help CIOs and EA practitioners leverage business architecture to guide investment and execution decisions,...
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.