Gartner Blog Network


Progress Remains Slow on Both Government 2.0 and Cloud

by Andrea Di Maio  |  April 7, 2011  |  2 Comments

I just finished my briefing tour, which touched Washington DC and five state capitals. I had a lot of great interactions with government CIOs, state secretaries, IT leaders and PR officers. In almost all cases I found great interest on both topics, as well as pretty typical patterns about how to face problems and opportunities.

These were the main findings.

Government 2.0: Still in its infancy

  • There is a fairly good understanding of open government and what it entails. People are familiar with open data initiatives and data.gov in particular, but tend to share the view that their main benefit is transparency and that citizens are the main beneficiaries.
  • At the same time, there is limited appreciation of how open government can help improve efficiency of government operations, and how it should be moved from being a political priority to comply with to becoming an essential tool in the normal course of business.
  • Security is still seen by many as an insurmountable obstacle to a broad deployment of social networking tools.
  • Social media policies are far less developed than I would expect at this stage. Some clients mentioned that such policies are still at a draft stage, and they do entirely focus on risk minimization rather than value creation.
  • I had the impression that states, through their CIO association, may not be leveraging as much as they could some of the excellent work done at the federal level by the GSA.

Although everybody seemed to agree with the importance of moving toward employee-centricity, very little that is happening in that space.

Cloud computing: Still confusing

  • Everybody is interested in cloud computing and is somewhat looking into plausible options, with an unsurprising focus on email as well as storage as a service.
  • Most people seemed surprised when looking at examples of where cloud is being piloted, or used, in mission critical situations, and how it is possible to decouple portions that can be hosted in the public cloud, from those that need to stay on premises.
  • Preoccupation about security and compliance were expressed by quite a few, and there seem to be quite some expectations that the FedRAMP process may benefit states, although the timeline for its completion may be affected by the current budgetary uncertainties.
  • The potential tensions between centralized or shared IT organizations and their clients caused by cloud computing emerged in a couple of cases.
  • There is great demand for framework contracts that would help different state and local agencies address the market with well structured and common requests for information, quotation or proposals. This is another area where I would welcome greater cooperation between federal, state and local government, and where international cooperation (mostly with the UK and the Australian federal and state governments) would be very beneficial.

I doubt that we will see major “strategic” migrations into the cloud in the short term. Government IT organizations need to mature their thinking about how to deal with cloud just as an additional sourcing option, rather than something new and revolutionary, hence leveraging their experience from managing service vendors.

Additional Resources

View Free, Relevant Gartner Research

Gartner's research helps you cut through the complexity and deliver the knowledge you need to make the right decisions quickly, and with confidence.

Read Free Gartner Research

Category: cloud  web-20-in-government  

Tags: cloud-computing  government-20  

Andrea Di Maio
Managing VP
19 years at Gartner
33 years IT industry

Andrea Di Maio is a managing vice president for public sector in Gartner Research, covering government and education. His personal research focus is on digital government strategies, open government, the business value of IT, smart cities, and the impact of technology on the future of government Read Full Bio


Thoughts on Progress Remains Slow on Both Government 2.0 and Cloud


  1. […] had to tell him that, as I reported in a recent post, I did not see too much progress, and also that the nature of the inquiries I get from government […]

  2. Andrea
    You are spot on re Open Government but not in Australia. We do rate a mention in your post. I thought I would give you some more ammo.
    I am helping organise the inaugural “Local Open Government Innovation Summit” in Australia in (“little old”) Nowra (South coast of NSW, Australia.
    This started as a US based initiative (by Lucas Cioffi), a staunch advocate) but he could not get the numbers in US to make it a going concern.
    I got 1 innovative local government group on board (Shoalhaven City Council) and now we are on the way to our Australian first in Nowra on Wednesday 18th May 2011.
    Have a look at our wiki and the agenda for our conference/unconference.
    It is very experimental and designed to educate. We welcome comments from far and wide.
    See http://opengovinitiative.wikidot.com/start
    We are driving open gov here in OZ and as you probably know this is happening to a greater or less extent at Federal and State levels.

    Delighted to have you involved and welcome any comments you might have,

    Darron Passlow
    Social Innovator in OZ.



Comments are closed

Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.