Gartner Blog Network


Are Government Mashup Contests Running Out Of Steam?

by Andrea Di Maio  |  September 10, 2009  |  3 Comments

During the Government 2,0 Expo in D.C., the winners of the Apps for America contest were selected, with much cheering and enthusiasm on Twitter and other social media following closely this event in D.C.

I went through the three winners and looked at the list of submissions, which were 46, one less than the Apps for Democracy contest launched last year in DC. Are they enough? Are they too few? Do they show the right direction for the future?

As usual, numbers can be looked at both ways. This is certainly the first time such a contest takes place at federal level, and it was not a government initiative, but one launched by Sunlight Labs and sponsored by Google, O’Reilly media and a few others. So it probably lacked the official endorsement of the federal government, but certainly enjoyed quite some publicity, in conjunction with the Gov 2.0 Summit marketing and all the buzz around data.gov. If one looks at the half-full glass, this indicates that there are developers out there who are up to the challenge posed by data.gov and others. What we see are just the first, baby steps, showing the potential.

On the downside, the number of applications may look small, and the characteristics of the winning applications relatively straightforward. The winners, picked up through popular vote, were:

  • Datamasher, which allows users to “combine different data sets in interesting ways and create their own custom rankings of the states”.
  • Govpulse, which allows users to search the Federal register by location, topic, agency, date etc.
  • Thisweknow, which – in its current implementation – focuses on few nationwide data sets (wih a spatial component) from six different agencies in the data.gov catalog, but aims to model the entire data.gov catalog and make it available to the public using Semantic Web standards as a large-scale online database

While applications were not meant to do anything else than proving a concept, yet winners are not terribly impressive. Datamasher provides tools that may end up being part of data.gov itself, govpulse refers to a single database, and Thisweknow – like most semantic web efforts – can prove its real value only by significantly scaling up.

So, yes, it is fair to say I am not impressed. I would expect mashups between data.gov or other government data sets and external, non-government information, especially because this initiative was not owned by government and one could expect some greater room for maneuver to prove the concept.

The real question is whether contests for open data (like ShowUsABetterWay) or mash-up applications (like this one) are approaching their expiry date and there is a need for something new or for new ways to stimulate creativity and imagination.

Future contests should really push (and award) for how to use government data in conjunction with non-government data, including how to leverage data created by social networks (such as ratings). It would also be useful to inject a little bit more purpose: what problem would a mash-up solve? Why should that entice people to create more mash-ups? Finally, a closer connection with government services would help: how does a mash up help government deliver a better service? And how can one combine services and not only information across sectors and communities?

Mash-up application contests are becoming stale: it is time to move on.

Additional Resources

View Free, Relevant Gartner Research

Gartner's research helps you cut through the complexity and deliver the knowledge you need to make the right decisions quickly, and with confidence.

Read Free Gartner Research

Category: open-government-data  

Tags: mashups  web-20-in-government  

Andrea Di Maio
Managing VP
19 years at Gartner
33 years IT industry

Andrea Di Maio is a managing vice president for public sector in Gartner Research, covering government and education. His personal research focus is on digital government strategies, open government, the business value of IT, smart cities, and the impact of technology on the future of government Read Full Bio


Thoughts on Are Government Mashup Contests Running Out Of Steam?


  1. PaulGeraghty says:

    Personally I don’t think they have run their time, but I do think they reflect that the data being made available:

    -lacks standards when it comes to descriptive markup (e.g. not rdf)
    -agencies are putting out the easy (safe) stuff first

    I think the take-off will happen when some the suits spot that some techies have figured out how to monetize the results.

    Going back to the lack of standards, I mean specifically when the semantic meaning of the data can be injected into the semantic “pickups” of the search engines.

    It just needs more, and better data. Dumping .csv files out is not really going to hack it much longer though.

    There should be questions in the minds of any would-be data-masher about the continuity, currency and legitimacy of the data – well there is mine anyway – and until these issues are ironed out, none but the brave will do too much more that “proof of concepts”.

    Maybe someone is out there with a mashup killer-app, just waiting to unleash it?

  2. @Paul – For sure the lack of standards does not help. On the other hand, even companies like Google, Amazon and Microsoft have offered the extraction of public data (in whichever format) to make them more easily consumable. My contention is that these apps should really show value as opposed to just giving nicer interfaces to govt-only information (and services).

    @Peter – thanks for remining me of the second round of Apps for Democracy in DC. I find odd that, although the web site claims 200+ submissions – I cannot find anything else than the old ones when browsing through the application catalog: what am I missing? Further, the winner application is certainly cool but still supports my point: where is integration between government and non-government data?



Comments are closed

Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.