It has become publicly known recently that the creator of the Java programming language (and a near-cult figure with some), James Gosling, has resigned from Oracle. This seems to suggest his displeasure with the Oracle’s road map for Java (although he makes no statement to this effect). However beyond the emotional side of things, the real impact of Gosling’s resignation is minimal in my opinion, especially in the shadow of the impact on java from its acquisition by Oracle. Here are some points to illustrate what I mean:
- Oracle strategically depends on Java. Their middleware and new applications are all 100% Java.
- In mainstream enterprise computing Java is the new COBOL with the only trailing alternative – C#. It’s not being replaced.
- IBM also strategically depends on Java (though not as much as Oracle) and IBM has custom favorable terms in its license for Java, so Oracle has a limited sway over IBM’s use of Java
- Gosling leaving Oracle is 100% predictable and in fact you may wonder what took him so long
- Gosling’s displeasure only has a symbolic meaning – he does not change or decide anything. Although he can influence some developers’ attitudes — he has minimal influence, if any, on enterprise IT policies
- Oracle asserted its ownership of Java twice: once by Larry Ellison declaring at the Sun Acquisition Q&A something to the effect of “We have Java and IBM does not have Java” (not an exact quote) and the second time by co-locating Java ONE and Oracle World
- IBM was unhappy with Sun leadership of JCP and they are going to be even more unhappy with Oracle’s. I would not be surprised if IBM never certified for Java EE 6 and beyond, just to avoid giving Oracle’s JCP any credibility
- Java may lose some portability not by IBM forking it, but by IBM not adopting any new stuff that Oracle is going to bring to Java CE/ME/EE. Whatever Java IBM offers now may be the end of the line for standard Java from IBM. I guess, you might call it forking, but they will continue to call it Java and Java EE, except all new development will be IBM layers over the 2009 state of Java standards. To fight that Oracle might rename the Java EE standard again, so IBM cannot claim compliance without adopting new specs. We will see.
- Red Hat will just watch the two fight it out. They are good at it.
- The winner in this battle may be Spring – an enterprise-worthy framework that is not owned or controlled by either IBM or Oracle.
Gosling’s departure in my opinion does not add or subtract from the enterprise prospects of Java because of the massive investments made by IT organizations and leading vendors in Java and because there is no new viable alternative. But the unique good times of cross-platform portability brought about by “vendors against Microsoft” are coming to the end (regardless of Gosling). C++ programs have never been portable from one ORB to another and Java programs will no longer be portable from one app server to another in 3-5 years.
Gartner has a series of research notes published in the aftermath of the Oracle acquisition of Sun. My colleague and friend Massimo Pezzini is the lead on many of them. Hope all of you can get to them to see the considered Gartner position on this topic. This, above, is just one man’s opinion.
What do you think? Let me know.
——————————– the hobby basement ————————————-
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Predicts 2017: Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence is changing the way in which organizations innovate and communicate their processes, products and services. Practical...
View Relevant Webinars
An Integrated Approach to Strengthening Your Supply Chain
Digital disruption and the weakening global economy have made profitable growth more challenging than ever. Yet, some CSCOs are able...
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.