In Does XML Schema Earn its Keep? I argued that XML schema was of little use in validating HL7 messages and document, and an obstacle to adopting other, more concise syntaxes. In his comments on my post and subsequent emails Graham Grieve made an excellent case for looking at the business of producing messages and driving tooling. I have to agree with him that for the current state of RIM-based standards XML schema is a necessary ingredient.
There was a time — and apparently it still is the time — when XML is the way to roll with the industry in terms of adaptability to existing tooling.
I was partly projecting onto XML itself my disaffection for the HL7 style of using XML.
However, as Graham has pointed out in The XML consensus is breaking down XML has not worked out to be the panacea we all hoped, wedding the data, text and object-oriented worlds. In the early years it offered one promise and delivered — it was a syntax that IBM, Oracle and Microsoft would agree on. That has been a great step forward.
Like most steps forward, once we have achieved it we begin to say “what have you done for me lately?” It appears to me that we are in a state across the IT industry where XML is becoming the “old technology” and people are waiting for a new trend that fixes some of the problems.
What will the new panacea be? I would like to believe that the work being done in JSON now, like the early work in XML circa the year 2000, will be at the heart of whatever develops.
But as Graham suggests what is needed is more than a simpler syntax.
For now I guess we’ll plod along with XML and XML schema and keep an eye on the nascent use new technologies.
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Predicts 2017: Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence is changing the way in which organizations innovate and communicate their processes, products and services. Practical...
View Relevant Webinars
How to Live Without Mobile Device Management
This webinar addresses the growing trend of users refusing to have enterprise management of their mobile devices due to privacy concerns....
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.