by Tom Austin | August 7, 2010 | Comments Off on Genuine Research — Accept No Substitutes, especially vendor-written summaries!
IBM’s Ed Brill decided to do himself a favor by publishing his summary of our recent research note entitiled “Migrating Off Notes/Domino E-Mail May Make Sense in Some Circumstances”.
If you want to understand what we said, read our research note, not (just) Ed’s spin. I say “we” because even though the only name on the author line is mine, the contents were written by hundreds of Gartner clients, filtered through several key Gartner analysts and vetted by a large number of analysts and managers at Gartner.
While you need to be a Gartner client to read the note, the summary we posted is available to everyone, whether clients or not:
Increasing numbers of IBM Lotus Notes e-mail customers seek Gartner’s advice about moving to other e-mail systems. Either staying with Notes e-mail or migrating can be the right choice, depending on each enterprise’s needs and circumstances.
Those of you who are clients should take the complete Research Note — print it out — and take a highlighter to it (or use electronic equivalents) and try to figure out what statements in the research note Ed Brill forgot to mention in his write up. If you run into Ed, ask him. If you run into an IBM account executive brandishing Ed’s summary, ask the account exec.
Then prioritize the omissions for Ed (there’s more than one). And send them to him asking him why those statements were left out.
Don’t really do that, please! Ed doesn’t need to be deluged with more email, in either electronic or paper form. I’m trying to make an important point. You might benefit from seeing the difference between our research and vendor spin (or vendor employee spin).
Consider the sources: Ed is IBM’s chief Notes evangelist (his official title is Director, End-User Messaging and Collaboration) and his focus is maximizing IBM’s success. Would you expect someone in that position to put a spin on his summary of our research, a spin to help him achieve his objectives? (I bet you and I have formulated the same answer in our minds.)
I’ve been where Ed is today. I used to work for a vendor in this very space, among others, Digital Equipment. I know what someone in Ed’s position is supposed to do. And, in my capacity as a Gartner analyst, I know what I have to do too.
If you want to know what we wrote, read our research, not a vendor’s summary or extract or use of selected quotes. Otherwise, you never really know what you’re getting, do you?
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Predicts 2017: Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence is changing the way in which organizations innovate and communicate their processes, products and services. Practical...
View Relevant Webinars
The Mobile Scenario: Taking Mobility to the Next Level
The definition of "mobile" in the post-app era will involve new interactions such as bots and conversations, new devices such as wearables...
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.