<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On renaming.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_otter/2009/07/01/on-renaming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_otter/2009/07/01/on-renaming/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:39:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank Koehntopp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_otter/2009/07/01/on-renaming/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Koehntopp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_otter/2009/07/01/on-renaming/#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Amen brother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Tschudy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_otter/2009/07/01/on-renaming/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Tschudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_otter/2009/07/01/on-renaming/#comment-258</guid>
		<description>Naming (whether it is creating or changing) is often viewed as a simple way of making a change akin to painting a room rather than an integrated part of brand and product development that has long term implications. This whimsical mindset now has well understood costs: environmental waste, consumption of natural resources, productivity... that far exceeds the benefit of validating the marketing department or as an afterthought by sloppy managment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naming (whether it is creating or changing) is often viewed as a simple way of making a change akin to painting a room rather than an integrated part of brand and product development that has long term implications. This whimsical mindset now has well understood costs: environmental waste, consumption of natural resources, productivity&#8230; that far exceeds the benefit of validating the marketing department or as an afterthought by sloppy managment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irregular Enterprise mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_otter/2009/07/01/on-renaming/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Irregular Enterprise mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_otter/2009/07/01/on-renaming/#comment-257</guid>
		<description>[...] day see its nadir in Fusion Applications. I&#039;m wondering whether this will be Oracle&#039;s cue to take a stroll down Butt Hole Road. That and its laser focus on pleasing Wall Street explains why customers continue to contribute to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] day see its nadir in Fusion Applications. I&#8217;m wondering whether this will be Oracle&#8217;s cue to take a stroll down Butt Hole Road. That and its laser focus on pleasing Wall Street explains why customers continue to contribute to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
