<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Partly or Mostly Cloudy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_bittman/2008/10/09/partly-or-mostly-cloudy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_bittman/2008/10/09/partly-or-mostly-cloudy/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:31:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Evolution of the Cloud Computing Market</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_bittman/2008/10/09/partly-or-mostly-cloudy/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>The Evolution of the Cloud Computing Market</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_bittman/2008/10/09/partly-or-mostly-cloudy/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] (Can A Cloud Computing Provider Be Too Massive?, Is Google the Mainframe of Cloud Computing?, Partly or Mostly Cloudy?) and I’m getting more and more comfortable talking about three major phases of market evolution. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Can A Cloud Computing Provider Be Too Massive?, Is Google the Mainframe of Cloud Computing?, Partly or Mostly Cloudy?) and I’m getting more and more comfortable talking about three major phases of market evolution. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Bittman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_bittman/2008/10/09/partly-or-mostly-cloudy/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bittman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_bittman/2008/10/09/partly-or-mostly-cloudy/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Absolutely - that&#039;s what I meant by quality of service. I believe the whole idea of an SLA will by necessity become more flexible for some enterprises/workloads - high availability needed today, not tomorrow, better performance during a peak competitive period, less performance later, etc. Somewhat the opposite of typical outsourcing SLAs today, where change is slow and painful. And, of course, there will also be the opposite - good-enough, standard, uniform, up almost all the time service. And for many enterprises/workloads, that will be absolutely fine. Agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely &#8211; that&#8217;s what I meant by quality of service. I believe the whole idea of an SLA will by necessity become more flexible for some enterprises/workloads &#8211; high availability needed today, not tomorrow, better performance during a peak competitive period, less performance later, etc. Somewhat the opposite of typical outsourcing SLAs today, where change is slow and painful. And, of course, there will also be the opposite &#8211; good-enough, standard, uniform, up almost all the time service. And for many enterprises/workloads, that will be absolutely fine. Agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David, Business Technology Roundtable</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_bittman/2008/10/09/partly-or-mostly-cloudy/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>David, Business Technology Roundtable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_bittman/2008/10/09/partly-or-mostly-cloudy/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering if you have any thoughts to share about customization that goes beyond the features and functions of the service platform?

Isn&#039;t it possible to add meaningful value by offering flexible service level agreements, as an example?

A willingness to adapt the terms an conditions of a typical contract is one area where creativity might differentiate a provider in the marketplace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering if you have any thoughts to share about customization that goes beyond the features and functions of the service platform?</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it possible to add meaningful value by offering flexible service level agreements, as an example?</p>
<p>A willingness to adapt the terms an conditions of a typical contract is one area where creativity might differentiate a provider in the marketplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
