by Svetlana Sicular | March 4, 2013 | Comments Off on California Legislature Begets Data Scientists
The most re-tweeted phrase at the SAS analyst conference (#sassb) today is “A data scientist is a business analyst that lives in California.” Every joke has a bit of truth behind it.
Here is a paradox: some simple but essential things slip our attention. What is the last name of Queen Elizabeth II? When did World War II end? Recently, I asked my brother-in-law over a barbeque what exactly he does for a living. I knew vaguely that he is a negotiator. The barbeque juices played their role, and he suddenly started telling me about California employment laws, settlements and people who make their living by accusing companies in … I learned from him that, since 2008, in California, exempt and non-exempt employees are treated equally under certain conditions, and therefore, everyone has to have a right job title and many other right things.
Under the influence (of my brother-in-law), I recalled that around four years ago, my husband received a note from his previous company about a hefty settlement amount for working overtime. I also realized that ever since, my husband’s title has been periodically changing during his employer’s campaigns on giving the right titles. Because my husband does something unique at work and lives in California, his latest title is five words long.
And suddenly I realized that DJ Patil, in his book Building Data Science Teams, wrote that he and Jeff Hammerbacher, under the pressure of LinkedIn’s HR, invented the title of data scientist in 2008. Yes, this was the same law which caused my husband’s multiple titles and which infuriates my brother-in-law, who turned out to be a head of corporate affairs.
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Predicts 2017: Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence is changing the way in which organizations innovate and communicate their processes, products and services. Practical...
View Relevant Webinars
How to Live Without Mobile Device Management
This webinar addresses the growing trend of users refusing to have enterprise management of their mobile devices due to privacy concerns....
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.