<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Britain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_jones/2009/06/17/digital-britain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_jones/2009/06/17/digital-britain/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:43:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Jones</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_jones/2009/06/17/digital-britain/comment-page-1/#comment-1499</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_jones/?p=495#comment-1499</guid>
		<description>I think part of the challenge is that both ISPs and wireless operators would rather talk about the headline maximum speed rather then real-life average speed or the quality of experience from the user perspective. Maybe we need some new standard for a more comprehensive measurement of network performance that factors in latency and average performance not peak performance. Sounds like a job for OFCOM in their new role of monitoring the quality of the nation&#039;s network infrastructure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think part of the challenge is that both ISPs and wireless operators would rather talk about the headline maximum speed rather then real-life average speed or the quality of experience from the user perspective. Maybe we need some new standard for a more comprehensive measurement of network performance that factors in latency and average performance not peak performance. Sounds like a job for OFCOM in their new role of monitoring the quality of the nation&#8217;s network infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Britain</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_jones/2009/06/17/digital-britain/comment-page-1/#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Britain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_jones/?p=495#comment-1498</guid>
		<description>[...] prepared for politicians it identifies lots of opportunities for further prevarication (sorry click for more             var gaJsHost = ((&quot;https:&quot; == document.location.protocol) ? &quot;https://ssl.&quot; : [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] prepared for politicians it identifies lots of opportunities for further prevarication (sorry click for more             var gaJsHost = ((&#8221;https:&#8221; == document.location.protocol) ? &#8220;https://ssl.&#8221; : [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Leman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_jones/2009/06/17/digital-britain/comment-page-1/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Leman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_jones/?p=495#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>The 2Mbps issue is odd. Various industry &quot;experts&quot; say this is OK but as you say its snail-like - the network of yesteryear. I guess that latency, contention and capacity is hardly ever mentioned because it would show just how lousy ISP offerings actually are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2Mbps issue is odd. Various industry &#8220;experts&#8221; say this is OK but as you say its snail-like &#8211; the network of yesteryear. I guess that latency, contention and capacity is hardly ever mentioned because it would show just how lousy ISP offerings actually are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
