<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nick Gall &#187; fun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/category/fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>We don&#8217;t actually do what we propose &#8212; we just propose it</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/03/01/we-dont-actually-do-what-we-propose-we-just-propose-it/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/03/01/we-dont-actually-do-what-we-propose-we-just-propose-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 22:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[about me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/03/01/we-dont-actually-do-what-we-propose-we-just-propose-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a Small World #3897:
I was recently in Manhattan on business and took the opportunity to have dinner with our dear friends Allison Tolman and her beau Peter Cohen. In the course of our conversation, I was explaining what an IT industry analyst does for a living by referring to the now-famous (at least in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><u>It&#8217;s a Small World #3897:</u></p>
<p>I was recently in Manhattan on business and took the opportunity to have dinner with our dear friends <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/3/807/48">Allison Tolman</a> and her beau <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/2/b33/67b">Peter Cohen</a>. In the course of our conversation, I was explaining what an IT industry analyst does for a living by referring to the now-famous (at least in the worlds of analysts and consultants) <a href="http://www.google.com/notebook/public/16212422200548905233/BDQbgSgoQ86fWoPwj">UPS commercial</a> about the two consultants that first aired, I believe, during the 2000 Olympics in Sydney.</p>
<p> <object height="360" width="480" classid="D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"><param name="_cx" value="12700"><param name="_cy" value="9525"><param name="FlashVars" value=""><param name="Movie" value="http://walkernewsdownload.googlepages.com/mediaplayer.swf"><param name="Src" value="http://walkernewsdownload.googlepages.com/mediaplayer.swf"><param name="WMode" value="Window"><param name="Play" value="0"><param name="Loop" value="-1"><param name="Quality" value="High"><param name="SAlign" value="LT"><param name="Menu" value="-1"><param name="Base" value=""><param name="AllowScriptAccess" value=""><param name="Scale" value="NoScale"><param name="DeviceFont" value="0"><param name="EmbedMovie" value="0"><param name="BGColor" value=""><param name="SWRemote" value=""><param name="MovieData" value=""><param name="SeamlessTabbing" value="1"><param name="Profile" value="0"><param name="ProfileAddress" value=""><param name="ProfilePort" value="0"><param name="AllowNetworking" value="all"><param name="AllowFullScreen" value="false"><embed src="http://walkernewsdownload.googlepages.com/mediaplayer.swf" width="480" height="360" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars="//www.petercohen.com/video/UPS_30_reg.flv" /></object>
<p>As I described the ad, Peter&#8217;s smile kept getting bigger and bigger. I paused and said, &quot;What&#8217;s so funny?&quot; Peter replied, &quot;That&#8217;s my ad.&quot; My jaw dropped to the floor. I&#8217;ve know Peter for years and I never knew he&#8217;d been involved with one of my all-time favorite ads. Mostly, we would talk about his creative work for Sun Microsystems, but that&#8217;s a topic for another post&#8230;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony_mark">؟</a></p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.petercohen.com/">Peter&#8217;s other work</a> as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/03/01/we-dont-actually-do-what-we-propose-we-just-propose-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would you drop 10 friends for a hamburger?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/01/21/would-you-drop-10-friends-for-a-hamburger/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/01/21/would-you-drop-10-friends-for-a-hamburger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/01/21/would-you-drop-10-friends-for-a-hamburger/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has social software really led us to this? According to the NY Times Bits blog, nearly 234,000 facebookers were defriended by their so-called friends looking to score a free hamburger. Burger King ran a promotion on Facebook that gave someone a coupon for a free hamburger if they would drop 10 friends. Harsh but hilarious.
Facebook [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has social software really led us to this? According to the <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/whopper-sacrifice-de-friended-on-facebook/">NY Times Bits blog</a>, nearly 234,000 facebookers were defriended by their so-called friends looking to score a free hamburger. Burger King ran a promotion on Facebook that gave someone a coupon for a free hamburger if they would drop 10 friends. Harsh but hilarious.</p>
<p>Facebook called a halt to the promotion because the promotion actually told the dropped friends they had been dropped&#8230;for a hamburger. Ouch! Something about privacy issues. How about just plain human cruelty issues? Can you top this one?</p>
<p>I would really like to me the person would came up with such a wickedly perverse marketing campaign. I think we would really hit it off.</p>
<p>PS I would never drop 10 Facebook friends for a mere hamburger. I&#8217;d need at least a Triple Whopper with Cheese. <a href="http://ask.metafilter.com/13110/Homer-Simpson-Drooling">uhhhHHHhhrghhhuuuuHHHggrruhhhHHhh</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/01/21/would-you-drop-10-friends-for-a-hamburger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SUPERUSELESS SUPERPOWERS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/01/21/superuseless-superpowers/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/01/21/superuseless-superpowers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/01/21/superuseless-superpowers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just had to share a hilarious comic blog I just came across: SUPERUSELESS SUPERPOWERS. Here&#8217;s a sample that had me laughing so hard I cried:
 
Here&#8217;s the description:
SUPERUSELESS SUPERPOWER: In-flight flight
Being able to soar through the air still won&#8217;t save you from recycled oxygen and endless stories from complete strangers. Known as the &#34;Cabin Sparrow,&#34; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just had to share a hilarious comic blog I just came across: <a href="http://superuseless.blogspot.com/">SUPERUSELESS SUPERPOWERS</a>. Here&#8217;s a sample that had me laughing so hard I cried:</p>
<p><a href="http://superuseless.blogspot.com/2009/01/blog-post.html"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3364/3215792091_ff0e34c580.jpg" /></a> </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the description:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>SUPERUSELESS SUPERPOWER: In-flight flight</strong></p>
<p>Being able to soar through the air still won&#8217;t save you from recycled oxygen and endless stories from complete strangers. Known as the &quot;Cabin Sparrow,&quot; this so-called power lets you fly, but only within the confines of an airplane. At least you can leapfrog the beverage cart when explosive diarrhea strikes at 30,000 feet.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Maybe the power just appeals to me because I fly so much.</p>
<p>All the funny SS&#8217;s got me thinking about SUPERUSELESS IT SUPERPOWERS! How about </p>
<p align="center"><strong><font size="5">Nine-Track Magtape Vision</font></strong></p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/scriptingnews/2627291590/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3029/2627291590_b513e12ac3.jpg" /></a> </p>
<p align="center">Able to read data of a 9-track magnetic tape with your own eyes &#8212; albeit at 1 bit per second!</p>
<p>Let me know what SUPERUSELESS IT SUPERPOWERS you&#8217;d like to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/01/21/superuseless-superpowers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Have the Charts And Graphs to Back This Up&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/01/14/we-have-the-charts-and-graphs-to-back-this-up/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/01/14/we-have-the-charts-and-graphs-to-back-this-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/01/14/we-have-the-charts-and-graphs-to-back-this-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely hilarious, and essential to any enterprise architect who wants to put naysayers in their place from the get go.
Warning &#8211;Use of the f&#8217;bomb: http://www.stickergiant.com/Charts-and-Graphs_d49.html
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely hilarious, and essential to any enterprise architect who wants to put naysayers in their place from the get go.</p>
<p>Warning &#8211;Use of the f&#8217;bomb: <a title="http://www.stickergiant.com/Charts-and-Graphs_d49.html" href="http://www.stickergiant.com/Charts-and-Graphs_d49.html">http://www.stickergiant.com/Charts-and-Graphs_d49.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2009/01/14/we-have-the-charts-and-graphs-to-back-this-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is Literally Hilarious</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/11/26/this-is-literally-hilarious/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/11/26/this-is-literally-hilarious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/11/26/this-is-literally-hilarious/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something funny to be thankful for on Thanksgiving.
 
via Marta Strickland
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something funny to be thankful for on Thanksgiving.</p>
<p> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/w0TYun-Nq1Q&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6" width="425" height="344" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" />
<p>via <a href="https://twitter.com/martastrickland/status/1023966254">Marta Strickland</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/11/26/this-is-literally-hilarious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond the Hype Cycle &#8212; Let&#8217;s Talk Extinction Timeline</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/11/25/beyond-the-hype-cycle-lets-talk-extinction-timeline/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/11/25/beyond-the-hype-cycle-lets-talk-extinction-timeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gartner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/11/25/beyond-the-hype-cycle-lets-talk-extinction-timeline/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it&#8217;s great to talk about the &#34;Peak of Inflated Expectations&#34; and the Plateau of Productivity&#34; what everyone wants to know is &#34;When will this become extinct?&#34; Unfortunately, Gartner&#8217;s Hype Cycle does not predict extinctions.
But not to worry, now there&#8217;s the Extinction Timeline:
 Extinction Timeline: what will disappear from our lives before 2050
I think we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it&#8217;s great to talk about the &quot;Peak of Inflated Expectations&quot; and the Plateau of Productivity&quot; what everyone wants to know is &quot;When will this become extinct?&quot; Unfortunately, Gartner&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/products/research/media_products/book/index.jsp">Hype Cycle</a> does not predict extinctions.</p>
<p>But not to worry, now there&#8217;s the Extinction Timeline:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/10/extinction_time.html"><img src="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/extinction_timeline.jpg" /></a> <a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/10/extinction_time.html">Extinction Timeline: what will disappear from our lives before 2050</a></p>
<p>I think we should enter negotiations with the author, <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">Ross Dawson</a>, for adding extinction analysis to hype cycles immediately!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/11/25/beyond-the-hype-cycle-lets-talk-extinction-timeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PDC Gang Signs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/28/pdc-gang-signs/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/28/pdc-gang-signs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pdc2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/28/pdc-gang-signs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Global Nerdy. This is the best thing I&#8217;ve seen out of PDC so far! Click on the picture to go to the original.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.globalnerdy.com">Global Nerdy</a>. This is the best thing I&#8217;ve seen out of PDC so far! Click on the picture to go to the original.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.globalnerdy.com/2008/10/26/pdc2008-gang-signs/"><img src="http://www.globalnerdy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/pdc_gang_signs.jpg" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/28/pdc-gang-signs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Very Funny Obama vs McCain Krump/Breakdance Dance-Off</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/23/very-funny-obama-vs-mccain-krumpbreakdance-dance-off/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/23/very-funny-obama-vs-mccain-krumpbreakdance-dance-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/23/very-funny-obama-vs-mccain-krumpbreakdance-dance-off/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know why, but this video really cracked me up. Especially the special appearance by Palin. Bring it!

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why, but this video really cracked me up. Especially the special appearance by Palin. Bring it!</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MSJIORWj4tw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MSJIORWj4tw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/23/very-funny-obama-vs-mccain-krumpbreakdance-dance-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Follow Me on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/21/follow-me-on-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/21/follow-me-on-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[about me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/21/follow-me-on-twitter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m finally on twitter now, and I&#8217;m happy to report that it hasn&#8217;t been the major time sink I feared it would be. I think in large part this is due to how simple the interface and functionality are. Contrast this with Facebook, which has infinite interface and functional (aka apps) knobs and levers to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m finally on twitter now, and I&#8217;m happy to report that it hasn&#8217;t been the major time sink I feared it would be. I think in large part this is due to how simple the interface and functionality are. Contrast this with Facebook, which has infinite interface and functional (aka apps) knobs and levers to play with and is a huge time sink. I think it is FB that made me fear twitter.</p>
<p>My twitter handle is &#8212; what else &#8212; ironick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/21/follow-me-on-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does one call the term that causes the emergence of a complementary retronym?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/18/what-does-one-call-the-term-that-causes-the-emergence-of-a-complementary-retronym/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/18/what-does-one-call-the-term-that-causes-the-emergence-of-a-complementary-retronym/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 04:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/18/what-does-one-call-the-term-that-causes-the-emergence-of-a-complementary-retronym/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[This post was triggered by a fun discussion in the comments on the post Is &#8216;Wireless&#8217; Anemic or Merely Retrospective?]
When the term &#34;electric guitar&#34; became nearly as popular as the original unmodified word &#34;guitar&#34;, the term &#34;acoustic guitar&#34; emerged because &#34;guitar&#34; (unmodified) was considered ambiguous. &#34;Acoustic guitar&#34; is labeled the retronym. What is &#34;electric guitar&#34; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[This post was triggered by a fun discussion in the comments on the post <a href="http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/17/is-wireless-anemic-or-merely-retrospective/">Is &#8216;Wireless&#8217; Anemic or Merely Retrospective?</a>]</p>
<p>When the term &quot;electric guitar&quot; became nearly as popular as the original unmodified word &quot;guitar&quot;, the term &quot;acoustic guitar&quot; emerged because &quot;guitar&quot; (unmodified) was considered ambiguous. &quot;Acoustic guitar&quot; is labeled the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retronym" target="_blank">retronym</a>. What is &quot;electric guitar&quot; labeled?</p>
<p>Certainly, both &quot;electric guitar&quot; and &quot;acoustic guitar&quot; are neologisms. But I think it would be useful to have a word to denote the neologism (&quot;electric guitar&quot;) that caused the retronym neologism to come into being. I looked around and didn&#8217;t find any such word. Before I coined one myself, I wanted to make sure that there wasn&#8217;t one already out there. So I am asking here.</p>
<p>BTW, if there is nothing else out there, I&#8217;m thinking of coining the word &quot;specinym&quot; for &quot;specialized term.&quot; Retronyms come into being when someone puts a specialized qualifier in front of a word denoting a concept that previously did not have any &quot;species&quot; and then the specialized term becomes popular.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how I would use &quot;specinym&quot; in a sentence: &quot;The popularization of a specinym like &#8216;electric guitar&#8217; is what leads to the creation of a retronym like &#8216;acoustic guitar&#8217;.&quot; Got any better proposals? How about &quot;neonym&quot;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2008/10/18/what-does-one-call-the-term-that-causes-the-emergence-of-a-complementary-retronym/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
