<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security No-Brainer #7: If You Have Intellectual Property Embedded in Software, Protect it.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/neil_macdonald/2009/07/07/security-no-brainer-7-if-you-have-intellectual-property-embedded-in-software-protect-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/neil_macdonald/2009/07/07/security-no-brainer-7-if-you-have-intellectual-property-embedded-in-software-protect-it/</link>
	<description>A Member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:19:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/neil_macdonald/2009/07/07/security-no-brainer-7-if-you-have-intellectual-property-embedded-in-software-protect-it/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/neil_macdonald/2009/07/07/security-no-brainer-7-if-you-have-intellectual-property-embedded-in-software-protect-it/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Yes - agree on Mr. Dhanani&#039;s comment. I alluded to this in the original post -- &quot;including additional controls on source code in the development process.&quot;

There are ways to do this without allowing the developer to keep a local copy of the source code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; agree on Mr. Dhanani&#8217;s comment. I alluded to this in the original post &#8212; &#8220;including additional controls on source code in the development process.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are ways to do this without allowing the developer to keep a local copy of the source code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Dhanani</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/neil_macdonald/2009/07/07/security-no-brainer-7-if-you-have-intellectual-property-embedded-in-software-protect-it/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Dhanani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/neil_macdonald/2009/07/07/security-no-brainer-7-if-you-have-intellectual-property-embedded-in-software-protect-it/#comment-372</guid>
		<description>There are way to keep the source code safe while the person is working on it. Allowing to the programmer/developer to add, delete, compile, de-bug, create source code without being able to keep any of it. A unique way to protect Source Code IP so situations like Goldman Sachs don&#039;t happen (ever).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are way to keep the source code safe while the person is working on it. Allowing to the programmer/developer to add, delete, compile, de-bug, create source code without being able to keep any of it. A unique way to protect Source Code IP so situations like Goldman Sachs don&#8217;t happen (ever).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/neil_macdonald/2009/07/07/security-no-brainer-7-if-you-have-intellectual-property-embedded-in-software-protect-it/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/neil_macdonald/2009/07/07/security-no-brainer-7-if-you-have-intellectual-property-embedded-in-software-protect-it/#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Excellent point, Whit. Executable code is just another container of ones and zeros much like a Word document, spreadsheet or similar - any of which may contain embedded IP. 

Conceptually, the vendors and products I mention above are not too different than DRM on a sensitive document.

Therein lies the rub - do most organizations really have a good grasp of what containers of bits represent sensitive information and which do not?  IP embedded in software is an area where many organizations probably don&#039;t yet have a good grasp (to be fair some do, for example ISVs, software within embedded devices, etc...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point, Whit. Executable code is just another container of ones and zeros much like a Word document, spreadsheet or similar &#8211; any of which may contain embedded IP. </p>
<p>Conceptually, the vendors and products I mention above are not too different than DRM on a sensitive document.</p>
<p>Therein lies the rub &#8211; do most organizations really have a good grasp of what containers of bits represent sensitive information and which do not?  IP embedded in software is an area where many organizations probably don&#8217;t yet have a good grasp (to be fair some do, for example ISVs, software within embedded devices, etc&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whit Andrews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/neil_macdonald/2009/07/07/security-no-brainer-7-if-you-have-intellectual-property-embedded-in-software-protect-it/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Whit Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 03:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/neil_macdonald/2009/07/07/security-no-brainer-7-if-you-have-intellectual-property-embedded-in-software-protect-it/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take it past code, too, Neil. For example, we&#039;ve written research that identifies search relevancy calculations as IP -- and why not? If a company like ours establishes lexicons that identify concepts, why wouldn&#039;t that represent absolute value for our competition or would-be competition? Your point is excellent -- IP is increasingly attached to code, and quasi-code. Failing to protect it is unfortunate if understandable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take it past code, too, Neil. For example, we&#8217;ve written research that identifies search relevancy calculations as IP &#8212; and why not? If a company like ours establishes lexicons that identify concepts, why wouldn&#8217;t that represent absolute value for our competition or would-be competition? Your point is excellent &#8212; IP is increasingly attached to code, and quasi-code. Failing to protect it is unfortunate if understandable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Security No-Brainer #7: If You Have Intellectual Property Embedded &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/neil_macdonald/2009/07/07/security-no-brainer-7-if-you-have-intellectual-property-embedded-in-software-protect-it/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Security No-Brainer #7: If You Have Intellectual Property Embedded &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/neil_macdonald/2009/07/07/security-no-brainer-7-if-you-have-intellectual-property-embedded-in-software-protect-it/#comment-367</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the original here:  Security No-Brainer #7: If You Have Intellectual Property Embedded &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the original here:  Security No-Brainer #7: If You Have Intellectual Property Embedded &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
