<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mike McGuire &#187; Mobile music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/category/mobile-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Android G1+ Amazon MP3 Store Integration = Mobile Music (More or Less)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/2008/09/23/android-g1-amazon-mp3-store-integration-mobile-music-more-or-less/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/2008/09/23/android-g1-amazon-mp3-store-integration-mobile-music-more-or-less/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G1-Amazon MP3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Google dropping its first Android-based phone, the G1, on the market today, the galaxy&#8217;s search giant almost made the online music/mobile music market a bit more interesting by preloading Amazon&#8217;s MP3 download store software onto the device.  But today&#8217;s press reports leave me thinking that this is barely a music-capable mobile phone.
G1 users will be able to start [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Google dropping its first Android-based phone, the G1, on the market <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10048655-1.html?tag=txt" target="_self">today</a>, the galaxy&#8217;s search giant almost made the online music/mobile music market a bit more interesting by preloading Amazon&#8217;s MP3 download store software onto the device.  But today&#8217;s press reports leave me thinking that this is barely a music-capable mobile phone.</p>
<p>G1 users will be able to start paying to download from Amazon&#8217;s six-million-plus song catalog of DRM-free, 256kbps-encoded-songs whenever they&#8217;re in range of a WiFi connection. (Apparently, the OTA download dream is still, as yet, unrealized. In my opinion, that&#8217;s just as well.) Downloading songs from Amazon to the G1 via a WiFi connection seems  pretty straighforward. After that, the user then can synch the songs, via USB cable, back to their primary computer.  Not clear if there is some sort of auto-synch capability.  Actually hearing the music they buy on the device might be a bit more problematic.</p>
<p>Why? Because there are some odd things about this one.  According to  <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10048708-1.html?tag=txt" target="_self">this </a>story and <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10048919-1.html" target="_self">this</a>story , the device doesn&#8217;t have a 3.5mm headphone jack or stereo Bluetooth capabilities.  Not to be too picky, but I find a 3.5mm headphone jack kind of important for  listening to music acquired from the &#8220;cloud.&#8221; On a portable device.  Another strange decision: apparently the G1 sports a mere 1GB of internal storage. (It reportedly does have an expansion slot.)</p>
<p>As a much anticipated product designed, or at least advertised to be a serious disrupter to the established mobile phone market and touted by the press in the past few months as a serious iPhone competitor, the Android G1 still seems more like a great idea only partially realized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/2008/09/23/android-g1-amazon-mp3-store-integration-mobile-music-more-or-less/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One More Spin of the Format Upgrade Cycle for Music Industry: Preloaded microSD Flash Cards</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/2008/09/22/one-more-spin-of-the-format-upgrade-cycle-for-music-industry-preloaded-microsd-flash-cards/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/2008/09/22/one-more-spin-of-the-format-upgrade-cycle-for-music-industry-preloaded-microsd-flash-cards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhysicalMedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In hopes of giving the physical format-upgrade cycle one last spin – not to mention maybe increasing the standard unit price the majority of consumers pay for prerecorded music to anything more than $.99/song &#8212; all four major music labels have banded together with SanDisk to announce“slotMusic” an effort to build consumer interest in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Arial" lang="EN">I</span></span><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Arial" lang="EN">n hopes of giving the physical format-upgrade cycle one last spin – not to mention maybe increasing the standard unit price the majority of consumers pay for prerecorded music to anything more than $.99/song &#8212; all four major music labels have banded together with SanDisk to <span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: windowtext" title="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/09/22/BU9S131A7F.DTL"><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/09/21/BU9S131A7F.DTL" target="_blank">announce</a></span></span>“slotMusic” an effort to build consumer interest in the distribution of DRM-free, high-bit-rate-encoded songs on 1GB microSD memory cards.  </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Arial" lang="EN"> </span></span><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Arial" lang="EN">But wait a minute, we’re about six years into the legitimate online music market, and the labels want to take us back to the days of physical media? </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Arial" lang="EN"> </span></span><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Arial" lang="EN">Apparently, they do want to focus on physical.  For SanDisk, the motivations are easy to understand: another way to ship more packaged flash memory.  For the labels, however, the reasoning is a bit more elusive.  I believe what we’re seeing is the last gasp of the bundle for music. By throwing more “stuff” onto the microSD “album,” the industry is looking to make the package as attractive and profitable as possible.  I say that because my guess is that the unit pricing for a slotMusic card will be more than a CD.  Retail pricing for a slotMusic card has not been released and no availability date was announced today. SanDisk executives said they expect the slotMusic cards to be in the channel by the holiday buying season. (WalMart and BestBuy are the two retailers on board first. Interestingly, each has been mentioned in news reports as reducing the amount of square footage they dedicate to CDs.)  </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Arial" lang="EN">SanDisk and the labels are touting slotMusic effort as the answer for what they claim is a significant number of music consumers who desire not just ownership of music bits on a hard drive but also the packaging everything else – liner notes etc. (SanDisk said the parties had done market research to support this claim but did not have the methodology, sample size etc. available when we spoke last week.) Some key benefits cited by the SanDisk executives: </span></span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Symbol"><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Symbol" lang="EN"><span>·<span style="font-size: xx-small;font-family: Times New Roman"><span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">        </span></span></span></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial"><span style="font-family: Arial" lang="EN">The growing number of mobile phones with microSD slots</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Symbol"><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Symbol" lang="EN"><span>·<span style="font-size: xx-small;font-family: Times New Roman"><span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">        </span></span></span></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial"><span style="font-family: Arial" lang="EN">Instant gratification: The SanDisk argument is that “buying” a song online involves finding it, downloading it and synching it to a portable device. The “time to play” can be hours. With the slotMusic cards, one can buy them at retail and pop them in a device’s slot and play immediately.</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Symbol"><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Symbol" lang="EN"><span>·<span style="font-size: xx-small;font-family: Times New Roman"><span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">        </span></span></span></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial"><span style="font-family: Arial" lang="EN">As previously mentioned, no DRM and minimum encode rates will be 256kbps, with many planned to be released at 300kbps or higher.  (By comparison, most of the songs in Apple’s iTunes store are encoded at 128Kbps.) </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Arial" lang="EN">To me, it remains an open question whether a significant number of consumers will actually respond to the notion of extending the old concept of the “bundle” even though the bundle can now include not only songs but also video, lyrics, and any number of items. It’s the songs consumers are after and today’s digital natives seem to be quite comfortable going out and acquiring that other information as needed. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Arial" lang="EN">It will be interesting to see if the slotMusic cards can become the ’08 holiday season’s must-have stocking stuffer or the latest example of a technology that misses a market shift.  </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Arial" lang="EN">Then again, “green” consumers might be crossing it off their lists since it appears the retail packaging for the fingernail-sized microSD cards is about the same size as that of a CD. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: x-small;font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Arial" lang="EN"> </span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/2008/09/22/one-more-spin-of-the-format-upgrade-cycle-for-music-industry-preloaded-microsd-flash-cards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
