<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Titans Coming to Grips with UGC?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/2008/11/10/media-titans-coming-to-grips-with-ugc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/2008/11/10/media-titans-coming-to-grips-with-ugc/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:44:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McGuire</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/2008/11/10/media-titans-coming-to-grips-with-ugc/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McGuire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/?p=33#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I missed the point? I thought my last sentence was in synch with your last &#039;graph. (also, might check out the First Take where we say the same thing...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed the point? I thought my last sentence was in synch with your last &#8216;graph. (also, might check out the First Take where we say the same thing&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/2008/11/10/media-titans-coming-to-grips-with-ugc/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/mike_mcguire/?p=33#comment-27</guid>
		<description>You obviously miss the point of why this deal was done and how it hasn&#039;t changed anything at Viacom in regards to UGC or the distribution of professional content. 

Bottom line is that people are going to embed / snag / rip content off of websites - why not monetize and protect copyrights at the same time? It is a brilliant move by Viacom AND MySpace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You obviously miss the point of why this deal was done and how it hasn&#8217;t changed anything at Viacom in regards to UGC or the distribution of professional content. </p>
<p>Bottom line is that people are going to embed / snag / rip content off of websites &#8211; why not monetize and protect copyrights at the same time? It is a brilliant move by Viacom AND MySpace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

