CRM is the Rodney Dangerfield of business processes. For anyone denied exposure to this master of the funny phrase he was an American stand up comic during the 1960′s and ’70′s. He felt that all of the other comedians were younger and better looking, but not better. He accepted the underdog position, and in one of his first acts opened with the line that he would repeat thousands of times over his career: “I don’t get no respect.” For example: “I don’t get no respect. I asked my wife ‘is there somebody else?’ She said, ‘there MUST be!!”
And doesn’t this just about capture the way many of us could summarize the CRM efforts in our business? Given a choice of projects, IT would likely say, “Isn’t there anything ELSE we can work on.” And for just cause: working on improving the customer experience, and contributing to customer loyalty, profitability and revenue growth, though compelling, deals with change management issues that IT cannot control. IT cannot make customer service agents more motivated, or customer-facing employees more devoted to the customer. They can’t own the survey process or the customer feedback process or decide on the processes by which sales, logistics, marketing and service departments will act.
But I recently spoke with the business owner of a large financial advisory services company (business-to-business) who described the impressive improvements to the customer experience on the web and in the contact center. He has grown his business over 40 percent in the past five years, and contacts with the contact center and on the website from partners and end customers have grown almost 75 percent. But his customer support costs have not grown at all. His support staff has not grown at all. How did he handle 40 percent more clients and 75 percent more interactions? By shifting more and more of the interactions to self service.
Don’t think that getting your business customers to move from interactions with a human to interactions with the website is all that easy. First of all, his customers pay a lot of money for his company’s services, so there was an assumption that customers ‘deserved’ a human. And nobody was about to use self-service unless it was equally convenient and equally effective. But working with the customers, and hand-in-hand with the CIO, the company has done just that. I won’t go into detail, as I may create a Case Study. The short story is that they studied, together, the ‘psychology of deflection,’ and like a Karate kamae position, they are always looking for the right stance to take with the customer for the key support processes. They look for patterns of interaction, recurring questions, highest impact answers, and then focus, focus, focus on creating solutions, communicating them to customers, and probing for new ways to measure and improve, measure and improve.
IT and the lines of business = successful (=profitable and cost-reducing) CRM strategy.
Category: Uncategorized Tags:

Michael Maoz





































































































2 responses so far ↓
1 Laurent Pacalin October 28, 2008 at 1:28 pm
Improving the customer experience, contributing to customer loyalty and working on revenue growth certainly should be key elements of a successful CRM initiative. Early CRM deployments failed to reach these objectives because they were internally focused and more geared toward Sales Force Automation than true Customer Relationship Management.
In my experience at Blue Martini Software and Siebel Systems, successful CRM in a B2B environment can only be obtained through what I define as CRE or Customer Relationship Empowerment.
A powerful example of customer empowerment in product development is the externalization of the MRD process by allowing customers and prospects to be in the driver’s seat. This is what we recently achieved at Fair Isaac (dmtools.fairisaac.com) by creating, in a few months, a composite CRE application leveraging the technology assets that we had and supplementing them with on-demand components and other services in the cloud. One of the cornerstones of this application is the deployment of an open and self-supporting community that has been very well received.
This is only the first step of a broader undertaking to create what Gartner calls a context delivery architecture or CoDA and the result of a very close collaboration between Marketing and IT.
Laurent Pacalin
CMO
Fair Isaac
2 Michael Maoz October 29, 2008 at 5:06 pm
Laurent,
Nice post. I’d love to see what you folks are doing. The CoDA research, as you would imagine, encompasses my “Intent Driven Enterprise” research concepts from a few years back. I’m still waiting to see how Fair Isaac participates in this through production sites. I’d welcome hearing from you!