Nissan’s LEAF electric vehicle is a remarkable achievement, but our interest lies in the simple carbon arithmetic that surrounds the vehicle. Before we go there, we note that electric drivetrain, battery and controller components will reshape the auto industry over the next decade.
The vehicle has a reported range of 100 miles, of a 24kWh battery. If we assume the average U.S. emissions factor for electricity generation of 1.34 pounds per kilowatt hour, charging the battery has an implicit emission of 32 pounds, or 0.32 pounds per mile. In practice, a complete 24kWh charge will require about 20 percent more input energy because of battery cycle efficiency, voltage drops, and converter efficiency. Therefore, a reasonable emissions estimate is 0.38 pounds of carbon dioxide per mile.
Now, an 18 mile per gallon vehicle emits about a pound of carbon dioxide per mile – so we can see that the LEAF is equivalent to a gas-powered fossil fuel vehicle that gets about 47 mpg. The Toyota Prius hybrid already achieves 48MPG. And the Honda Insight, a conventional lightly hybrid vehicle, achieves 40MPG.
Using data from the DoE, we can demonstrate how emissions efficiency vary by region. Note that these numbers are aggregates, and there will be significant regional variations.
State Equivalent Emissions rate
Average 45 mpg
California 98 mpg
Texas 41 mpg
Idaho 2,000 mpg (Idaho has minimal fossil fuel)
So we observe:
1) The vehicle has no tailpipe, but is capable of creating plenty of emissions elsewhere.
2) To impact emissions, the vehicle is most effective in low-carbon areas.
3) On average, hybrid vehicles are better – but this isn’t about averages. It is about cutting peaks.
4) Further deployment of renewable and nuclear energy will make electric cars much more attractive – in a few decades.
As noted, green isn’t easy.
2 responses so far ↓
1 Jay Scism // Aug 6, 2009 at 2:29 pm
The Insight is a hybrid, not a conventional vehicle. Both the Jetta TDI and the Smart ForTwo get over 40mpg in the EPA’s highway cycle, so they’re the best “conventional” vehicles (I use that term loosely for the Smart).
The point is well taken, though, all this is just shifting emissions around, like rearranging desk chairs on the Titanic.
If we’re seriously concerned about reducing CO2 emissions in our lifetime, we need to look at replacing existing coal plants with natural gas (about half again as much CO2/KWh), and taking your advice on nuclear power. Solar and wind power will not have a significant impact in the short term (and I mean 50 years short term) if ever.
2 Martin Reynolds // Aug 6, 2009 at 10:26 pm
Thanks, Jay – I fixed up my hybrid error. Interestingly, the Insight is a light hybrid with a relatively small battery and motor – but that is a decent compromise.
The danger we face is that we take all of these steps and end up standing still. Unfortunately, as alternative energy sources emerge, fossil fuels will simply get cheaper. And then people discover all kinds of new uses.
Leave a Comment