The issue of demonstrating the business value of IT is at the top of mind for both CIO’s and other executives as they look to allocate cash and other resources across the enterprise. The short answer is that right now there is no one metric and the most prevalent one IT budget as a percent of revenue is logically and financially bankrupt.
So let propose a potential metric that can address the question for most but not all organizations. That metric is:
EBITDA / IT Headcount
The first thing you will notice is that this metric is not IT based it’s a measure of overall enterprise productivity. That is because productivity is the central source of the business value of IT.
The measure – a measure of core productivity
The numerator of Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) is a common measure of the health of your operations. It is also the metric most frequently used for measuring senior executive performance from an earnings perspective. It defines your core earnings potential and IT is an essential part of the processes, work, collaboration etc that drives core earnings. It is the financial measure of productivity value that counts.
The denominator, IT Headcount, is the full time equivalents who are employed in IT. This is a measure of the efficiency and leverage the enterprise gets from IT. By concentrating on headcount, and not budget, the CIO can show that they are managing the cost structure of IT and that investments are made with an eye to creating a disproportionate impact on the enterprise.
This metric is similar to others that look at revenue per employee, or profit per employee, but they recognize the unique role that IT plays in creating leverage across the enterprise. Like that metric, it is a measure of productivity and one that smart executives use to realize the need to get more value out of the workforce (increase the numerator) rather than cut costs and productive capacity (decrease the denominator)
Do not count contractors
A suggestion is to leave out headcount that is outsourced or contract labor in the IT headcount number. Its true that this can artificially inflate the number and hid the fact that IT service levels may be requiring more people, but the more people they require are not people you control. They are people your outsource provider controls and you want that provider focused on quality of service and contracted price rather than participating in gaming the IT FTE number.
CFO’s will want to see that number, they will say that you are hiding productivity in it. Point out that these people are counted, in terms of the cost of their services in the EBITDA number, so its not like we are hiding them. Then simply ask that, then the company should also count all of its contract services, all of the people in their supplier organization that provide value to customers in their headcount when calculating EBITDA/Employee. After all that would only be fair. That should lead to an interesting discussion and support for a measure of the IT FTE’s you control and manage. You should measure productivity the same way, everywhere.
Why single out IT Employees?
Why this measure? Few will argue that IT people are different than other employees. They are, but not because they are technical or introverted, or like things more than people. Rather because they and the technologies they support are a fundamental source of core productivity in your organization. That is what this metric is trying to capture — that relationship between core productivity and IT resources.
How to manage to this measure?
CIOs and IT executives need to show this metric and its progression over time, rather than at a point in time. Just staying that your EBITDA/IT employee is $300,000 means nothing, because, in any one year, you can ‘game’ the number in terms of outsourcing, etc.
An external benchmark is also not particularly meaningful. Saying that you are at $300,000/person where others in the industry are at $200,000/person does not say much and may only say that you are more outsourced than others.
What says everything is the progression of that metric over time. See my prior post: The value of IT exists over time not at a point in time for more details. That shows that IT is well managed, has a business impact and has meaning to the enterprise.
A suggestion, go back over the past five years and calculate the number. Make adjustments as needed for contracts and outsourcing, but get an idea where you stand.
Add that metric to your metrics pack; make sure to show it over time in a control chart.
Share it with your people, so they get an idea of their value to the company and its bottom line
Consider it in your planning for 2011 – recognize that if there is going to be growth and you need IT people to support that growth.
Good Luck, and please let me know if there are other measures that you use. IT is difficult to measure, so we will all benefit from each other’s experience.
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.