What is the future of the enterprise and its relationship with the individual?
How is social media and the entry of ‘digital natives’ into the workforce going to change the face of business?
These are two questions that John Hagel III, John Seely Brown and Land Davison (HSBD) discuss in their book Power of Pull: How Small Moves, Smartly Made, Can Set Big Things. The authors have written a good book with strong views on the future nature of enterprises and their relationship to individuals. The Power of Pull is one of the most comprehensively thought out books on the subject of social media and the future of the enterprise to have come out. It goes way beyond the buzzword or branding driven works that concentrate more on staking out territory than investigating the future of companies, individuals and technology.
This is not a technology book, in fact it is more about the theory of the individual, their value and the impact of that value on companies. The central premise is that “institutions will be shaped to provide platforms to help individual achieve their full potential by connecting with others and better addressing challenging performance needs” page 8. This is a distinctively different view form others who see the future of social computing as one of communities or collectives taking action. Hagel, Seely Brown and Davison then go on to discuss such an environment as one of “pull” with three basic principles.
- Finding and accessing people and resources we need
- Having the ability to attack people and resources to yourself that are relevant and valuable
- Pull from within ourselves the indicate and performance required to achieve our potential
Now you can combine the quote and the points above and think this is a book at the cross roads between an academic researcher and Tony Robbins. This book is anything but. I have tremendous respect for the authors who have delivered a comprehensive and thoughtful book on a complex subject.
Hagel, Seely Brown and Davison see ‘Pull’ as concentrating on the innovation and new ideas that come from the people on the edge, those who are experimenting and pushing the envelope. They use the example of large wave surfing to illustrate that people working on the edge of their profession deploy sophisticated tools and communications patterns to make breakthroughs.
Creating breakthroughs is an integral part of competing in the future and therefore something that companies need to get better at. That is where the individual fits into their argument, they can engage the edge, learn more, build the relationships that bring the best of the edge into their creation spaces that allows them to leverage themselves in the corporation. It is an interesting premise and one that the authors illustrate through several ‘mavens’
I recommend this book in general and particularly the introduction and first chapter to business leaders who want a different view on the future and social media. Lately there are few books that I have highlighted or taken notes in the margins as much as I have with this one. There are a few strong ideas, well presented and discussed.
Strengths.
- The introduction – among the best and clearest I have ever read. It lays out the issues and scope of the book in a way that helps you figure out where to concentrate your attention as you read.
- The blending of business activities with technology as the book talks about the importance of platforms rather than applications and how enterprises will operate and compete more on platforms than products or market positions.
- Anti-hype, this is a serious look at the future without the platitudes about the net generation or how all our skills and what we know will be rendered irrelevant. In fact it is much the opposite.
- A rich blend of academic and engineering approaches to the issues that make for deep treatment of the issues.
Challenges
- The book gets repetitive at times particularly as it talks through the three aspects of pull. It often relies on the same story that can lead to it becoming worn and overused. The reliance on three or four cases does provide depth, but no one case can fit all of these ideas, reducing the effectiveness of the examples.
- The two major examples are non-business examples that are fun to read, but challenging to see how it applies to me. It was great to learn about surfing and the world of warcraft but real companies are applying these ideas and it would have been better to hear about them.
- The book has more than its share of jargon and in an engineering/academic style this makes reading it a little harder than it should. Jargon includes: push, pull, edge, creative spaces, big shift and shaping strategies to name a few. This is where the consultant-ese gets in the way.
- The emphasis and contrast between push and pull is stark and needs to be for literary purposes. However much of the economy and much of our work will remain heavily push influenced even when we are all knowledge workers. Building that bridge is the bigger challenge than saying ‘all smart people go be self actualizing.’
Finally, this book is a Deloitte developed book and the authors are all associated with Deloitte. The authors have done a great job in not writing a book about why you should buy pull based consulting services. While the authors have done a nice job in maintaining or presenting their ideas independently, they have a business basis that the reader should take into consideration. Still recommended, but the ideas are big, the presentation comprehensive so you will need to pull on your thinking cap and take the time to reflect on what is in this book. Enjoy.
You can find my review and others of the book on Amazon at the following link.
Category: Book Review Economy Innovation web 2.0 Tags: Economy, Innovation, Strategy and Planning, web 2.0

Mark P. McDonald





































































































10 responses so far ↓
1 Phil Simon April 21, 2010 at 8:08 am
Interesting review, Mark. I was sure about how to contact you, so forgive the unrelated comment.
If you’d be interested in a copy of my new book, The Next Wave of Technologies, for a possible review, then please contact me.
I can have Wiley send it out.
Phil Simon
phil@philsimonsystems.com
2 Peter Collins April 21, 2010 at 2:48 pm
I read this book with some level of interest being a fan of Seely-Brown’s work on knowledge management back in the 80s/early 90s. Unfortunately, I don’t see much progression from what he was writing about back then to what they’ve published today. The basic ideas remain the same, just the “case studies” (and I use that term loosely – I agree with you that those cases presented are not wholly convincing and seem a little disconnected with the main “theory” when analysed individually hence synthesizing the main learning points from each comes across as a little contrived and consultant-esque) have changed to reflect more modern organizations/business models etc.
If I had to sum up the whole idea in a nutshell it would be something of a hybrid of open innovation/let’s break down the walls of the firm in search for new knowledge, talent, ideas etc. meets the toyota production “pull” system on a massively expanded scale…to me, not that original.
3 Mark McDonald April 29, 2010 at 3:06 am
Simon and Peter
Thanks for both of your comments.
The book is good and yes it is repetitive in some places, but I am finding that in this world of twitch and short attention span it seems that some authors have to repeat their ideas to have them heard, or they gain new relevance in a changing context.
I think that the reader has to be able to separate that situation — good ideas gaining more importance — from the idea that the author is a one trick pony. I have not read all of Seely Browns work, but it seems to me that these ideas are gaining credence rather than just being repeated because the author does not have anything else to say.
4 Systems Savvy Supports the Power of Pull August 12, 2010 at 7:31 am
[...] have written great general reviews about the book (e.g., here & here) , so I don’t feel guilty about putting a systems savvy filter on my comments. I see The [...]
5 jose October 21, 2010 at 3:31 pm
I think that the author with this book really want to re-discover technology, many of the situations discribed are not things new to the 21 century, indeed many of these stuff was mini-descibed in “The Road ahead” by the great Bill.
Anyways the book its in my opinion more that a fairy story that a hard tangible knowledge that you can apply to the real daily routine.
6 john December 24, 2010 at 9:31 pm
Thank you for the review, Mark,
I think the magic of this book is that it focuses on the PASSION and potential of each individual. Dusty just loved surfing, and his passion was not motivated by money. This is a Big Shift from the push model.
BRINGING IT HOME at the end of each chapter was an excellent challenge for my daily profession.
7 Graham Douglas May 15, 2011 at 7:05 pm
The message I take from the book is we all need to change the way we think, plan, organize, govern and act in the light of our more accurate scientific understanding of the human mind and our physical, social and cultural environment. A starting point would be to educate everybody involved in Integrative Thinking which is about making connections in our knowledge as well as in Critical Thinking which is about understanding parts of our knowledge and justifying that understanding to others
8 Raj Kumar October 3, 2012 at 7:00 pm
The book is replete with observations, assumptions and possibilities. It is intelligent because it manages to be logical while dealing with a difficult subject. However, in making its projections of exponential returns from creation spaces it ignores its foundation of the disciplines of Senge. This makes it weak in philosophy and substance of the flows and hence quite devoid of a driving force for the desirable to transpire. In this day and age nobody has the time and energy to sustain a high level of reason and discipline for driving desirable ends like Pull. They must follow naturally from the means adopted. Knowledge flows is a large concept. Precisely what is required is not discussed. Thus what is it that technology must deliver is not clear. Can it be just participation? Can technology succeed if it must depend on external means for culture? Must the knowledge flow satisfy minimum standards of quality? These are questions that need to be addressed conceptually and answered for the future of Pull.
9 Raj Kumar October 3, 2012 at 7:06 pm
Regret i overlooked stating that it was the high quality of the review that set my gear wheels in motion. Thanks.
10 Mark P. McDonald October 3, 2012 at 7:37 pm
Raj
Thanks for your kind comments.
Leave a Comment