Does maturity stifle innovation? Yes, if you’re a child. Yes, if you’re childlike. And yes (maybe), if you’re an organization hoping for maturity and innovation to co-exist.
We all love maturity models and assessments that help us understand what we should be doing and how well we’re doing it – the Cosmo quiz thrives in organizational management. But traditional maturity factors are focused on structured and control-oriented processes and activities. “Mature” implies that an organization has built the discipline and capabilities to achieve processes or activities that are “repeatable, reliable, predictable, measurable and continuously refined”.
But the winds of change are blowing through our workplaces. A modern workplace is filled with knowledge workers and their processes will mature along a different path. Modern work management will require some structured capabilities but they will need many more organic capabilities. And mature organic processes have different characteristics. Repeatability, for example, is less valued in knowledge work – the focus for knowledge work is on the quality of the outcome, not the steps taken to achieve it.
So what? So, we have a lot of rethinking to do.
-
First, let’s rethink process design – should the emphasis on designing a reliable, predictable, repeatable, etc. process be replaced by a focus on enabling an employee or a customer to find the right information, select the right tools and connect with the right collaborators to accomplish a high-quality outcome?
-
And, what about the fact that different people can take different steps yet achieve equally good outcomes? Is productivity a new metric?
-
Finally, what are appropriate factors and measures of maturity? Assessing adherence to a structured process appears to be less relevant than evaluating quality of outcomes. And, with an outcome-based process, do we have the opportunity to continually innovate how things are done, while in a repeatable process, the opportunity lies in taking time and people out of the process. Note that when we’re focused on taking time and people out of processes, we may not see a radical new way to achieve our outcomes. So, this seems to make a case for a new view of maturity.
Watch for more on these ideas. I know many of you feel the winds of change. Tell us about it.
3 responses so far ↓
1 Twitted by innovate // May 28, 2009 at 8:57 pm
[...] This post was Twitted by innovate – Real-url.org [...]
2 Suresh v // May 29, 2009 at 9:06 am
In the current scenario, where the speed of the change is the need of the hour, organisations are doing the balancing act between innovation and repeatable structured process depending upon the need for a requirement. Process maturity itself get reached only by innovation at every step. It depends on the context. In a Surgery, though all the clinical procedures follow the typical repeatble way, the surgeon does innovation on the fly at times to be successful. Probably today business scenario in certain pockets are similar where Organisation does indeed separate processes and still innovate.
3 Kathy Harris // Jun 1, 2009 at 6:45 pm
Suresh, thanks for your comments.
I think we are in agreement that innovation is contextual and I like your insightful comment that maturity is reached only through continual innovation.
I’m currently working on an innovation maturity model where one of the five maturity factors is “innovation in how we innovate”. So, we are definitely on the same page.
Leave a Comment