Jonah Kowall

A member of the Gartner Blog Network

Jonah Kowall
Research Vice President
3.5 years with Gartner
20 years IT industry

Jonah Kowall is a research Vice President in Gartner's IT Operations Research group. He focuses on application performance monitoring (APM), Unified Monitoring, Network Performance Monitoring and Diagnostics (NPMD), Infrastructure Performance Monitoring (IPM), IT Operations Analytics (ITOA), and general application and infrastructure availability and performance monitoring technologies. Read Full Bio

OSCON 2014 Wrap-up

by Jonah Kowall  |  July 29, 2014  |  4 Comments

This was my first year attending the open source focused OSCON conference by O’Reilly. I’m a huge Velocity fan, and get a lot out of that conference, hence I figured I would try another conference. Overall I found this conference far less valuable to me for several reasons. While there was a bit of interesting content, the show lacked focus in general. There were show floor exhibits including do it yourself electronics, non-profit, to commercial vendors. Much of the conference was for recruiting in Portland, where lots of startups trying to keep pace with growth pull talent. Here are some of the better sessions I attended and a little bit about them:

Tutorial Node.js 3 Ways
C. Aaron Cois (Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute), Tim Palko (Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute)

Since I’ve already done some programming in Node for my Google Glass App, I attended this one more to get a better tutorial than my hack/trial by fire. My programming skills are hackery at best :)

You can find the content here :

This was a good primer, but there were a couple people in the room who needed a lot of tech support. Additionally some pre-prep by attendees would have made this much smoother. We did some good WIFI load testing, which showed the network couldn’t handle peak loads.

An ElasticSearch Crash Course –
Andrew Cholakian (Found)

I’ve written a lot about ElasticSearch, the internals of the engine were probably the most useful content I got from OSCON this year. I have a much better understanding of the technology with these fundamentals. Here are some notes:

  • Wikipedia is moving to it
  • Github code search based on it
  • Netflix using it for log data

Indexes can live anywhere, and are split across
Each Index has documents
Every field has an index

Docs are routed via hashing and sharded
Shards are lucene indexes – they are replicated

Deleting and updating indexes are expensive.
Writes are slow
Cannot do transactional operations

Docker – Is it Safe to Run Applications in Linux Containers?
Jerome Petazzoni (Docker Inc.)

This is one thing which is a major issue with putting Docker into production. The lack of control and general security are missing and this presentation was interesting and much needed. Jerome was an excellent presenter and made some very good points. I especially liked the idea of running app instances read only, that avoids most of the security issues.

Tracing and Profiling Java (and Native) Applications in Production – Twitter
Kaushik Srenevasan (Twitter)

Interesting discussion of how Twitter who is a heavy Java and Scala shop handles instrumentation. They run their own OpenJDK JVM distribution with customizations running on CentOS. In summary this is somewhat dated view of instrumentation since commercial BCI and instrumentation on Java has some so far. If you don’t want to pay for something and want to build your own, this is somewhat interesting, but has very limited capabilities in terms of what modern APM can do today. Here are the other notes:

  • Java, Scala most popular
  • Some C++
  • Some Ruby (Kiji), Python

They bundle their own JVMTI agents in the code.


  • Low latency garbage collection on dedicated hardware and mesos
  • Services are getting larger
  • Scala optimizations – functional programming language
  • Tools : Contrail, Twitter diagnostics runtime



  • Wanted something like dtrace, but they don’t have it on Linux
  • Using perf for the linux profiling

Please leave comments here or on twitter @jkowall thanks!


Category: APM DevOps IT Operations Monitoring Trade Show     Tags:

Vendor Insight posted on Splunk

by Jonah Kowall  |  July 22, 2014  |  3 Comments

Splunk has been rising quickly in the ranks of buyers looking to solve complex problems, or those looking to build interesting and new analysis of their data. As they have grown in popularity, and gone public we’ve been given a wealth of new data about the company, operations, and execution beyond hearing from their large customer base. In this research note, we’ve combined analysis of the technology, company, and financials. My colleague Gary Spivak, who’s background is on the financial analysis side led the research, and I contributed some additional analysis of the technology, company, and other elements. The note has only been out for a few days now, but it’s gotten a lot of response from our client base. For those of you who are clients, you can find the document here :

Vendor Insight: Splunk, Separating Hype From Reality –


Category: Analytics APM Big Data IT Operations Logfile Mobile Monitoring     Tags:

Hype Cycles Updated for 2014

by Jonah Kowall  |  July 22, 2014  |  Submit a Comment

Just wanted to provide a heads up that we’ve published updated Hype Cycles, there are more publishing now as well. The two which just hit the wire which I worked on.

Hype Cycle for Networking and Communications, 2014 –

  • I worked with Will Cappelli on the Application Performance Monitoring profile in this Hype cycle, which has some updates around APM.
  • Along with Vivek Bhalla, Colin Fletcher we wrote up a new profile for Network Performance Monitoring and Diagnostics Tools which is new for 2014.
  • Vivek lead our efforts around Network Configuration and Change Management (NCCM) tools. This profile wa supdated, and expect some great new research from Vivek on this topic.
  • Vivek also led our efforts along with support from Colin and myself on Network Fault Monitoring Tools, this profile has minor updates for 2014.

Hype Cycle for IT Operations Management, 2014 –

  • Will Cappelli led efforts on IT Operations Analytics (ITOA) thois year, along with support from Colin and myself. There were minor updates in this profile for 2014.
  • We also included the same profiles from the hype cycle above!

Submit a Comment »

Category: Analytics APM Hype Cycle IT Operations Logfile Monitoring NPM NPMD SaaS     Tags:

Cool Vendor Pick of the Week : Aternity mAPM

by Jonah Kowall  |  July 10, 2014  |  2 Comments

This week we are highlighting a new offering from Aternity which began shipping recently. Aternity, is headquartered outside of Boston, MA but along with many other APM companies most of the R&D takes place in Israel. Aternity has been an innovator in desktop end user experience monitoring. The solution while technically differentiated caters towards large enterprise implementations, which had prevented them from moving away from these enterprise installs. While most of our applications today have been moving to being purely web based applications causing increased importance in modern end to end APM solutions and RUM solutions there are still and will remain many critical applications on the desktop. Today’s APM tools do a poor job or otherwise provide a high level perspective (leveraging the network) of handling these non-web applications.

Aternity’s Workforce APM product, had been based on innovative and unique technology which allows for detailed user and workflow capture of any application running on a Windows desktop endpoint. This is not a solution which requires professional services or specialized programming as some of the other entrants in the market do. I have used the tool, it’s pretty easy to learn, but the programming is done with the studio product which needs work including a modern user interface. They have recently launched an improved studio (see video here : which helps some of these issues, but it’s still not as clean as alternate solutions when doing custom collection. The desktop capture agent is a small program running on the end point (Windows only, but it can be running on physical or virtualized hardware such as HVD/VDI implementations). The data is fed into a relational database and Tableau is used on top of this data to provide reporting, dashboarding, and most of the user interface.

Moving on to the new offering. Aternity mAPM is a mobile APM product, this product which allows for native application monitoring on Android and iOS. Implementation is done by both post compile wrapping of native mobile applications, or the compilation of the instrumentation into the native mobile application. Unlike today’s Workforce APM implementations, which are mostly deployed as traditional on premises software (although Aternity is seeing more customers opt for SaaS delivery of the enterprise solution) the Mobile APM offering can be deployed using Aternity’s SaaS services or via the traditional on premises deployment.

Here are the high level screens of the free Mobile APM offering, this is targeted at developers.



The product can be fed with simulated data or with actual data, in this case here is simulated data in my portal. The GUI is very usable, there is no scrolling and everything is drillable and filterable:



Here is the crash data where you can download the crash file for debugging.



Some interesting data usage reporting:


I’ve also used the built in support features, and can report Aternity is responsive and helpful even with the free accounts. As you can see a pretty comprehensive offering on the mobile side, now the question remains will Aternity be able to penetrate mobile development organizations or will they continue to sell strictly to the IT Operations buyers. The combined mobile and desktop end user experience monitoring is an interesting concept, but few organizations have the maturity to take advantage of both of these offerings due to fragmentation in most organizations.

I’m pretty tied up reading the thousands of pages and analyzing data for the upcoming APM Magic Quadrant, but I’ll find time next week to write up SOASTAs new mobile offering. On deck after that post will probably be SpeedCurve in early August. Thanks for reading, please leave feedback here or on twitter @jkowall.


Category: APM Mobile Pick of The Week SaaS     Tags:

Velocity Conference 2014 Wrap-up

by Jonah Kowall  |  June 30, 2014  |  3 Comments

Always one of the more enjoyable conferences for me to attend, I don’t get worked as hard as Gartner conferences which are also really enjoyable, but I spend time doing the educating versus listening to other smart people. Velocity is a practitioner focused conference and is very geeky (in a good way for those of us who are pretty deep technologists). I’ll highlight some of the great sessions I attended and other technologies I discovered.

The conference is put in my a competitor of course, since we do our own events, but they had over 2,400 registered attendees and over 100 sponsors. There seems to be growth here, and the conference is always larger. Here are some session bullets I found interesting. You’ll notice a pretty wide spread from performance of the front-end, application middleware, and backbends.

Webpagetest deep dive –

This is a great open source tool for measuring and diagnosing front-end performance. I’ve used the tool, but had been mostly ignoring it since it wasn’t evolving too much. That was quite a mistake since it’s evolved considerably since I’d last really used it.

  • Good to dig into the new features in the advanced settings tab
  • Run more than one test when measuring, always
  • Very cool advanced visual comparison
  • Filmstrip view has been improved
  • Can do mobile runs, which show it in a mobile browser (very cool)
  • Browser CPU usage stats can be overlaid on waterfall
  • Can export tcpdump (use in wireshark or cloudshark)

Docker –

Content was good for those who hadn’t used docker. I’ve done some basic work on it, and find it interesting, but also quite basic in nature. Some of the discussion hit on issues around security, support for other containers, and overall limitations in this immature, but evolving technology.

  • The room was packed.
  • Dockerfile instructions (kind of like a init.d script), I hadn’t used these before, but they are critical when using docker at scale.

RUM Comparison and Use Cases –

The team at SOASTA presented a non-vendor biased view of RUM. While I found the landscape they laid out basic, and partially incomplete, but still a valiant effort by the team there. The key takeaway is more users are trying to tie business metrics to RUM data, for example e-commerce companies tying and analyzing revenue to users and performance.

Google – Jeffrey Dean (

Interesting discussion by Google’s Jeffrey Dean, the most interesting part I found was his analysis of data replication to extra nodes to reduce latency, and of course the multiple-write technologies many use to deal with that replication closer to the source of the data

Keynote systems –

Ben investigated what page load times look like, some of the interesting data he presented was what fast was varied by country and other demographic data. He also used the video capture features of webpagetest.

Speedcurve – – Blog and Video of the Keynote –

This was one company I hadn’t heard of (well more like a 1 man show), interesting company which does a nice frontend and comparative analysis using a webpagetest backend. Some notes:

  • Sits on top of webpage test
  • Competitive benchmarking, runs once a day, multiple runs
  • Complements RUM
  • Shows filmstrips
  • Formats the data much better
  • Helps find savings, etc
  • Can get to webpagetest views as well
  • Showed some interesting research on visualizing data


Understanding Slowness – :

Always a highlight of Velocity for me, Theo is a unique and extremely bright individual. He always brings good analysis and practical content, he’s an ops guy through and through. There is no marketing or other fluff you often see with content at conferences. Some high level notes:

  • Document your architectures
  • Have a plan
  • Use redundant vendors, don’t put your eggs in one basket (easier said than done, but for some things a good idea)
  • Measure latency (performance
  • Quantiles over histograms
  • Observation – takes state, watches
    • Dtruce, truss, tcpdump, snoop, sar, iostat, etc
    • Synthesis – Run a test to enable diagnostics (replicate an issue)
      • Curl
    • Manipulation – test hypothesis
      • Vi/echo
      • Sysctl/mdb
      • Dtrace

Some Simple Math to get Some Signal out of Your Ops Data Noise – –

Not sure I’d call this simple math at all, but here is a very new company we awarded a Cool Vendor this year for APM and ITOA who focuses on ITOA use cases with their solution. They have a lot of growing up to do as a company, but they have some compelling analytics technologies. Mr Boubez applies and brings the readers through a journey of math, what we’ve tried (which doesn’t work too well) and some techniques which do work much better. Clearly worth a look.

  • Gaussians don’t work with data center data
  • Use histograms (even though Theo says they may not be the best visual analysis tool)
  • Kolmogorov-Smirnov test allows for better data
    • Handles periodicity in the data
  • Box Plots / Tukey
    • Doesn’t rely on mean and stddev
    • IQR moving windows –

Early phase tool for running rules against frontend optimization, which is a cool idea. I’m going to wait for lab time until version 3 written in node.js comes out in 3 weeks


Category: APM Monitoring Trade Show     Tags:

New Research : Apply IT Operations Analytics to Broader Datasets for Greater Business Insight | Also a June Update

by Jonah Kowall  |  June 30, 2014  |  5 Comments

Just wanted to share some news and new research. We’ve seen a lot of changes in the market within both APM (lots of new entrants in the past month, and many more coming in the next few months). Expect some more reviews and content on the blog for some of the more interesting vendors. I’ve been posting less this month since I’ve not been home much. The first half of June was spent attending two Gartner infrastructure and operations management conferences one taking place in Berlin, and the second in Orlando. I just arrived back from the Velocity conference, which I will be posting about this week.  I wanted to share some of the new research and content we presented.

The research note led by Colin Fletcher which I was able to co-author published June 24th, the presentation was given earlier this month, both titled:

Apply IT Operations Analytics to Broader Datasets for Greater Business Insight – <- (subscribers only)

The research highlights the flexibility and use cases for leveraging ITOA investments to combine IT and non-IT data to provide insight and extract relevant metrics across systems. Critical elements include the ability to explore, dream, and learn from the data collected driven by combining the right data sets. The following Strategic Planning Assumption: By 2017, approximately 15% of enterprises will actively use ITOA technologies to provide insight into both business execution and IT operations, up from fewer than 5% today. Highlights this trend, and the need to deliver better analytics capabilities to the business.

We explain the different data sets which must be collected, and how insight can be derived. We also make corollaries to other IoT and IT/OT research at Gartner.

Sample List of ITOA Vendors

AccelOps; Appnomic Systems; Apptio; Bay Dynamics; BMC; Evolven; Hagrid Solutions; HP; IBM; Loggly; Metafor Software; Moogsoft; Nastel Technologies; Netuitive; Nexthink; OpTier; Prelert; Savision; SAS; SL; Splunk; Sumerian; Sumo Logic; Teleran; Terma Software Labs; VMware; XpoLog

Expect a post of a cool vendor of the week tomorrow, and another one next week. We’ll be moving from a focus on ITOA log analytics vendors towards Mobile APM vendors.


Category: Analytics IT Operations     Tags:

Monitoring Technology Pick Of The Week : Xpolog

by Jonah Kowall  |  June 4, 2014  |  3 Comments

Thanks for those who came out to the Gartner IOM conference in Berlin which wrapped up yesterday. Interesting things happening and discussions with clients and attendees. We have the US version of this conference next week in Orlando and I will be there!

Posting this from lovely Budapest.

Keeping on the theme of log analytics, which comes up a lot in conversations related to both unified monitoring (infrastructure availability), and APM we are seeing this technology as particularly applicable across monitoring disciplines and silos within organizations.

There is yet another company we haven’t highlighted which has been flying under the radar since being founded in Israel in 2003 and has been building index and search technology which differentiates itself by doing deeper automated analysis of the data before the user is involved in querying the data.

The software discovers patterns and problems within the log data and is more proactive than other log analytics tools used by IT Operations. Data is searched by the user, and additional layers are placed on top of the data providing context. There are no rules needed to enable these features. The product has its own indexing and storage system, but also can support Hadoop data stores as well.

Version 5.0 was recently launched which improves upon the user interface slightly and also adds in native support of logstash (you can read my other posts on the ELK stack).


Once additional data is found you can add that insight to the query:


In the Screenshot below you can see some of the unique ways data is layered within the visualization timeline.


The product could use a more modern and usable user interface, easier implementation of collection agents and technologies to help get data into the system. These basic functions would help exploit a very impressive analytics engine.

The company has not had particularly good visibility due to being a self-funded technology focused company, they have not invested in marketing or sales efforts to date. This doesn’t mean they haven’t done well, they have some large installs of the technology which are impressive. This has resulted in less growth than competitors have had, but they are looking to change that.


Category: Analytics IT Operations Logfile Monitoring Pick of The Week     Tags:

Criteria for the 2014 Magic Quadrant for Application Performance Monitoring

by Jonah Kowall  |  May 29, 2014  |  9 Comments

Gartner is beginning the research process for the 2014 Magic Quadrant for Application Performance Monitoring. Will Cappelli and myself will be running the research as we have for the last few years. The release is currently planned for the 4th quarter of 2014, and we will be sending out surveys to vendors next week. Based on the data below, if you believe you qualify for the research please get in touch with myself via email or Twitter (@jkowall):

The 2013 Magic Quadrant saw minor changes around the weighting and importance of analytics and mobile. The 2014 research once again sees importance in these two critical trends, but also a focusing on SaaS delivery being essential as enterprises continue to adopt various public cloud delivered applications, services, and infrastructure.

Market Definition Is Unchanged

In the 2014 Magic Quadrant, the market definition will remain unchanged from the 2013 version (see “Magic Quadrant for Application Performance Monitoring”). While we have made changes in the application definition. Gartner defines an application as a software program or group of programs that interact with their environment via defined interfaces and which are designed to perform a specific range of functions. They may be end user facing, presenting a user interface, or provide the interface between two applications themselves. Applications are not (normally) wholly independent as they typically require an operating system or multiple operating system instances to manage their use of physical and logical computing, storage and network resources within a data center, or provided by 3rd parties.

Gartner defines APM as having five dimensions of functionality:

  1. End-user experience monitoring (EUM) — The capture of data about how end-to-end latency, execution correctness and quality appear to the real user of the application. Secondary focus on application availability may be accomplished by synthetic transactions simulating the end user.
  2. Application topology discovery and visualization — The discovery of the software and hardware infrastructure components involved in application execution, and the array of possible paths across which these components communicate to deliver the application.
  3. User-defined transaction profiling — The tracing of user-grouped events, which comprise a transaction as they occur within the application as they interact with components discovered in the second dimension; this is generated in response to a user’s request to the application.
  4. Application component deep dive — The fine-grained monitoring of resources consumed and events occurring within the components discovered in application topology discovery and visualization dimension. This includes server-side components of software being executed.
  5. IT operations analytics — The combination or usage of techniques, including complex operations event processing, statistical pattern discovery and recognition, unstructured text indexing, search and inference, topological analysis, and multidimensional database search and analysis to discover meaningful and actionable patterns in the typically large datasets generated by the first four dimensions of APM. Additionally these data sets are increasingly being analyzed for not only operational information, but business and software analytics.

Inclusion Criteria


Vendors will be required to meet the following criteria to be considered for the 2014 APM Magic Quadrant. In comparison to 2013, we have adjusted numerical thresholds.

■ The vendor’s APM product must include all five dimensions of APM (EUM, application topology discovery and visualization, user-defined transaction profiling, application component deep dive, and IT operations analytics). The deep-dive monitoring capabilities must include Java and .NET, but also may include one or more key application component types (e.g., database, application server). The solution must include user-defined transaction profiling, IT operations analytics technologies applied to text and metrics collected by the other four dimensions.

■ The APM product must provide compiled Java and .NET code instrumentation in a production environment.

■ Customer references must be located in at least three of the following geographic locations: North America, South America, EMEA, the Asia/Pacific region and/or Japan.

■ The vendor should have at least 50 customers that use its APM product actively in a production environment.

■ The vendor references must confirm they are monitoring at least 200 production application server instances in a production environment.

■ Some features of the APM offering must be available via a SaaS delivery model. This offering must be delivered directly from the vendor.

■ The product must be shipping to end-user clients for production deployment and designated with general availability by July 15th 2014.

■ Total revenue (including new licenses, updates, maintenance, subscriptions, SaaS, hosting and technical support) must have exceeded $5 million in calendar year 2013.

In addition to these criteria, we will be evaluating the vendor’s ability to cross multiple buying centers, as well as its ability to target specific verticals as validated by reference customers. Detailed criteria and subcriteria will be published along with the final research later this year.

Evaluation Criteria


While a vendor may meet the inclusion criteria for the APM Magic Quadrant, placement within the finalized Magic Quadrant will depend on its scoring in a number of categories. Ratings in these categories will be used to determine final placement within the 2014 APM Magic Quadrant. The 2014 evaluation criteria are based on Completeness of Vision and Ability to Execute.

Completeness of Vision

Market Understanding: This criterion evaluates vendor capabilities against future market requirements. The market requirements map to the market overview discussion and look for the following functionality:

■ EUM, including real and synthetic availability testing

■ Runtime application architecture discovery

■ User-defined transaction profiling

■ Application component deep dive

■ IT operations analytics for problem isolation and resolution

■ IT operations analytics to answer questions about software or business execution■ Ability to address the mobile APM market

Marketing Strategy: We evaluate the vendor’s capability to deliver a clear and differentiated message that maps to current and future market demands, and, most importantly, the vendor’s commitment to the APM market through its website, advertising programs, social media, collaborative message boards, tradeshows, training and positioning statements.

Sales Strategy: We evaluate the vendor’s approach to selling APM to multiple buying centers. We also evaluate the vendor’s ability to sell in the appropriate distribution channels, including channel sales, inside sales and outside sales.

Offering (Product) Strategy: We evaluate product scalability, usability, functionality, and delivery model innovation. We also evaluate the innovation related to delivery of product and services.

Business Model: This is our evaluation of whether the vendor continuously manages a well balanced business case that demonstrates appropriate funding and alignment of staffing resources to succeed in this market. Delivery methods will also be evaluated as business model decisions, including the strength and coherence of on-premises and SaaS solutions.

Vertical/Industry Strategy: We evaluate the targeted approaches in marketing and selling into specific vertical industries. Commonly, APM solutions are bought and targeted toward the financial services, healthcare, retail, manufacturing, media, education, government and technology verticals.

Innovation: This criterion includes product leadership and the ability to deliver APM features and functions that distinguish the vendor from its competitors. These include unique approaches to application instrumentation, mobile visibility, and catering towards the increased demands of continuous release. Specific considerations include resources available for R&D, and the innovation process.

Geographic Strategy: This is our evaluation of the vendor’s ability to meet the sales and support requirements of IT organizations worldwide. In this way, we assess the vendor’s strategy to penetrate emerging markets.

Ability to Execute

Product/Service: Gartner evaluates the capabilities, quality, usability, integration and feature set of the solution, including the following functions:

■ Day-to-day maintenance of the product

■ Ease and management of deploying new APM

■ Ease of use and richness of functions within the product

■ Product deployment options and usability

■ Integration of overall APM-related portfolio or unified APM offering

Overall Viability (Business Unit, Financial, Strategy and Organization): We consider the vendor’s company size, market share and financial performance (such as revenue growth and profitability). The leadership within the company in terms of people, what employees think of the leadership, and the ability to drive the company forward. We also investigate any investments and ownership, and any other data related to the health of the corporate entity. Our analysis reflects the vendor’s capability to ensure the continued vitality of its APM offering.

Sales Execution/Pricing: We evaluate the vendor’s capability to provide global sales support that aligns with its marketing messages; its market presence in terms of installed base, new customers, and partnerships; and flexibility and pricing within licensing model options, including packaging that is specific to solution portability.

Market Responsiveness and Track Record: We evaluate the execution in delivering and upgrading products consistently, in a timely fashion, and meeting road map timelines. We also evaluate the vendor’s agility in terms of meeting new market demands, and how well the vendor receives customer feedback and quickly builds it into the product.

Marketing Execution: This is a measure of brand and mind share through client, reference and channel partner feedback. We evaluate the degree to which customers and partners have positive identification with the product, and whether the vendor has credibility in this market.

Customer Experience: We evaluate the vendor’s reputation in the market, based on customers’ feedback regarding their experiences working with the vendor, whether they were glad they chose the vendor’s product and whether they planned to continue working with the vendor. Additionally, we look at the various ways in which the vendor can be engaged, including social media, message boards and other support avenues.


Category: APM IT Operations Monitoring     Tags:

Two rise, and two fall : The story of application performance monitoring (APM)

by Jonah Kowall  |  May 23, 2014  |  31 Comments

Prior to Gartner as an end user I watched the rise of companies like Precise software (I was a customer), and Optier. I’m not going to rehash all of the interesting twists of Precise you can read them here : the company was once worth well over $500m with some superb technology. With a successful $140m IPO in 2000, they were a high flyer. Through the changes of being bought twice after the IPO the business execution and leadership began to suffer. This was something they did not recover from, eventually resulting in a fire sale of the technology, where it was picked up for pennies on the dollar by Idera last year. We have high hopes Idera can rebuild the Precise technology and meld it with CopperEgg to create a compelling APM solution (of course SaaS and on premise).

Similarly Optier, another great technology innovator in APM, pioneered the use of advanced analytics in the space, didn’t suffer from vision or technology. The issues were once again the leadership outside of the technical parts of the organization. Having raised well over $100m in the last 9 years the company never kept pace with the changes in the market. Optier has finally closed their doors as of yesterday, really sad to see that the transformation from on premise heavy enterprise software to SaaS was not happening fast enough to fix the cash situation. Hopefully someone will acquire some of these great assets and possibly see the transformation through.

I’m starting to see yet another story follow in this similar path, but nothing I can write about yet… We shall see.

It’s certainly been an interesting 3 years at Gartner covering the APM space. Upon joining the company there was some innovation happening and the rise of two of the most well regarded and asked about companies in the APM space. Both AppDynamics and New Relic have been major disruptors in terms of making APM easy, inexpensive, and effective. Regardless of the depth and technical expertise of the companies (which they both clearly do have) it was about the delivery model and execution from a sales, marketing (which matters quite a bit), and senior management vision perspective. These two companies are both young, but the experience and leadership speaks for itself. Both having valuations well over $2b, and a path towards IPO, when they should they need the funding, they are the new generation of APM companies pushing the envelope.

I’m not discounting the technology and size of Compuware, they are going through a pretty drastic transformation themselves, and truly focusing on APM as a core business. Fixing some of the prior mistakes on the business side has been a journey for them, but there is no question on the vision and  technology. Expect some disruptive capabilities from Compuware, they are not in follow mode, while many if not all other APM companies are.

There are few other companies in the space truly leading and innovating, but many are trying to change and catch up. The question is with the rate of innovation and change, can anyone actually accomplish that, especially with the level of growth and capital commanded by the leaders in the market.

Please comment here on @jkowall on twitter


Category: APM IT Operations Monitoring     Tags:

Market Guide for Open-Source and Freeware Monitoring Tools

by Jonah Kowall  |  May 21, 2014  |  2 Comments

Wanted to give a heads up that we’ve updated a note which was published about 18 months ago around open source and freeware monitoring tools.

Clients only link:

Market Guide for Open-Source and Freeware Monitoring Tools

The document covers basic information on the following technologies:

Minisuites : Ipswitch, ManageEngine, Solarwinds

Free Monitoring from Artica ST (Pandora FMS), GroundWork, Icinga, op5, Opsview, Paessler, SevOne, Spiceworks, Splunk, Torch (Graylog2), VMTubro, XpoLog, Zabbix, Zenoss

SaaS monitoring from AppDynamics, AppFirst, Boundary, Datadog, GFI Software, Loggly, New Relic, ScaleXtreme (Citrix now), Splunk, and Sumo Logic

Changes from late 2012 until today:

Vendors Added

Since writing our previous research on how to leverage free and low-cost server, network and storage monitoring tools, we’ve seen the following changes in the market:

  • AppDynamics — Lite offering provides always-on monitoring, where the previous product was only functional during use
  • Artica ST — Pandora FMS, open-source offering
  • Icinga — Open-source offering
  • Loggly — Relaunched offering targeted at a wider user community
  • Torch — Graylog2, a new offering
  • XpoLog — Free offering for log analysis

Vendors Removed

Compared with our earlier research about free and low-cost server, network and storage monitoring, we removed vendors that, unless otherwise noted, left this market:

  • Correlsense — Low-cost offering
  • Jinspired — Lack of adoption across Gartner client base
  • Net Optics — Lack of adoption across Gartner client base
  • Quest Software (now part of Dell Software) — Low-cost offering
  • VMware — Low-cost offering lacked Gartner client adoption, but the solution is being retooled and better integrated with the VMware vCenter Operations Manager offering.

Sorry I forgot to include a few vendors and solutions in the note which will be in the next revision:

  • CA Nimsoft Monitor Snap is a freemium offering covering server monitoring for up to 30 servers without cost. They launched the offering about 7 months ago and have had over 2500 installations of the product!


Category: APM IT Operations Logfile Monitoring SaaS     Tags: