With the evolving buying centers and crtiera these buying centers use to evaluate and make purchases of APM products, we have determined that a shift in the critera for the Magic Quadrant for 2012 was required. In order to communicate these changes to both the buyers and suppliers of these solutions Will Cappelli and I published a research note outlining these changes and the criteria for the APM Magic Quadrant. You can find the research here :
Feel free to reach out here or on twitter with any comments or questions. @jkowall
Category: Analytics APM Monitoring Tags:

Jonah Kowall





































































































3 responses so far ↓
1 Graham Gillen April 2, 2012 at 8:47 pm
Very interesting Jonah…especially curious to see what “raising” the bar will do to the MQ and what vendors will do about the SaaS requirement.
Will also be very much interested in what research you and Will Cappelli author on specialized APM vendors that don’t meet all 5 dimensions. This is alluded to in this research brief.
2 Jonah Kowall April 6, 2012 at 3:14 pm
We shall see, but some vendors will not meet these requirements, thus the participants will be more comparable and focused.
3 Hype Cycles Published! August 9, 2012 at 3:13 pm
[...] It’s been far too long since I’ve posted. The last 6 weeks or so have been consumed by the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) Magic Quadrant, which is finally in editing now. We expect it to publish next week, and it should be interesting given the changes we have made. [...]
Leave a Comment