<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Storm in Any Port</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/2009/06/15/a-storm-in-any-port/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/2009/06/15/a-storm-in-any-port/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Safran</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/2009/06/15/a-storm-in-any-port/comment-page-1/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Safran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/?p=622#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

As the Corp Comm person for Tufin, you’re singing to the (cyber) choir. 

Interestingly enough, we’ve found that the trend is more the opposite of the old adage, along the lines of “Accept all except what is explicitly denied…”

It’s not out of laziness or stupidity either – it’s out of a lack of transparency (which seem to be at the root of many evils these days), visibility and process.  

We think we&#039;ve come up with something really cool that is &#039;preventative,&#039; as far as keeping rule base bloat in check, and we&#039;ll be talking to you soon enough for you to make your own call on how valid that claim is (so until then, go ahead and cringe...)

Anyhow...we&#039;ve been living and breathing this for quite some time.  

We&#039;re just wondering how big a deal this is amongst your client base...maybe we can talk about this in DC....??

Thanks
Liz Safran
Tufin PR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>As the Corp Comm person for Tufin, you’re singing to the (cyber) choir. </p>
<p>Interestingly enough, we’ve found that the trend is more the opposite of the old adage, along the lines of “Accept all except what is explicitly denied…”</p>
<p>It’s not out of laziness or stupidity either – it’s out of a lack of transparency (which seem to be at the root of many evils these days), visibility and process.  </p>
<p>We think we&#8217;ve come up with something really cool that is &#8216;preventative,&#8217; as far as keeping rule base bloat in check, and we&#8217;ll be talking to you soon enough for you to make your own call on how valid that claim is (so until then, go ahead and cringe&#8230;)</p>
<p>Anyhow&#8230;we&#8217;ve been living and breathing this for quite some time.  </p>
<p>We&#8217;re just wondering how big a deal this is amongst your client base&#8230;maybe we can talk about this in DC&#8230;.??</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Liz Safran<br />
Tufin PR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

