<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Say Cloud Computing, I Say Tomato</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/2008/12/05/you-say-cloud-computing-i-say-tomato/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/2008/12/05/you-say-cloud-computing-i-say-tomato/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:00:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Pescatore</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/2008/12/05/you-say-cloud-computing-i-say-tomato/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pescatore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/?p=266#comment-193</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty much option (2) above - specify a higher level of security or do it locally where you can check. Trying to secure a piece of Google or Amazon&#039;s cloud service on your own is going to be tough. It is just storage, you can encrypt the data before using cloud storage. But if you are using cloud processing, your software has to run on their processors and generally your data has to run through them in the clear. Now, you can specify security conditions for any processing elements to be used but you can&#039;t really secure it yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty much option (2) above &#8211; specify a higher level of security or do it locally where you can check. Trying to secure a piece of Google or Amazon&#8217;s cloud service on your own is going to be tough. It is just storage, you can encrypt the data before using cloud storage. But if you are using cloud processing, your software has to run on their processors and generally your data has to run through them in the clear. Now, you can specify security conditions for any processing elements to be used but you can&#8217;t really secure it yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Route B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/2008/12/05/you-say-cloud-computing-i-say-tomato/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Route B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/?p=266#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Or you could secure a piece of the factory farm yourself...   http://blog.elasticserver.com/2008/12/vpn-cubed-technical-overview.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could secure a piece of the factory farm yourself&#8230;   <a href="http://blog.elasticserver.com/2008/12/vpn-cubed-technical-overview.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.elasticserver.com/2008/12/vpn-cubed-technical-overview.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/2008/12/05/you-say-cloud-computing-i-say-tomato/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 05:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/?p=266#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Link didn&#039;t seem to take in the last comment:  http://www.appistry.com/blogs/sam/the-blind-men-and-cloud</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link didn&#8217;t seem to take in the last comment:  <a href="http://www.appistry.com/blogs/sam/the-blind-men-and-cloud" rel="nofollow">http://www.appistry.com/blogs/sam/the-blind-men-and-cloud</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/2008/12/05/you-say-cloud-computing-i-say-tomato/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 05:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/?p=266#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Hi John.  I enjoyed this post.  It reminded me of one by Appistry&#039;s Sam Charrington (twitter.com/samcharrington) taking on the challenge of defining what cloud computing is:

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John.  I enjoyed this post.  It reminded me of one by Appistry&#8217;s Sam Charrington (twitter.com/samcharrington) taking on the challenge of defining what cloud computing is:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloud Feed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Cloud Feed - Dec 5, 2008</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/2008/12/05/you-say-cloud-computing-i-say-tomato/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloud Feed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Cloud Feed - Dec 5, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/john_pescatore/?p=266#comment-178</guid>
		<description>[...] You Say Cloud Computing, I Say Tomato [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You Say Cloud Computing, I Say Tomato [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
