<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BPM Delivers Better Practices and Best Practices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/10/02/bpm-delivers-better-practices-and-best-practices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/10/02/bpm-delivers-better-practices-and-best-practices/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:21:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapping into Better Practices by Watching Knowledge Workers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/10/02/bpm-delivers-better-practices-and-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-4387</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapping into Better Practices by Watching Knowledge Workers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/10/02/bpm-delivers-better-practices-and-best-practices/#comment-4387</guid>
		<description>[...] http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/10/02/bpm-delivers-better-practices-and-best-practices/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/10/02/bpm-delivers-better-practices-and-best-practices/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/10/02/bpm-delivers-better-practices-and-best-practices/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Debauche</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/10/02/bpm-delivers-better-practices-and-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-2854</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Debauche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/10/02/bpm-delivers-better-practices-and-best-practices/#comment-2854</guid>
		<description>Yes, some think BPM means &quot;best practice management&quot;! It certainly provides agility to the information system, and makes it more responsive to business changes. But the process approach is not enough: my experience has showed me that it is the architecture that delivers agility, not the process approach itself. A badly architected process with a bad IT architecture can create the worst agile information system!

Bernard Debauche
VP EMEA Marketing
Axway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, some think BPM means &#8220;best practice management&#8221;! It certainly provides agility to the information system, and makes it more responsive to business changes. But the process approach is not enough: my experience has showed me that it is the architecture that delivers agility, not the process approach itself. A badly architected process with a bad IT architecture can create the worst agile information system!</p>
<p>Bernard Debauche<br />
VP EMEA Marketing<br />
Axway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention BPM Delivers Better Practices and Best Practices -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/10/02/bpm-delivers-better-practices-and-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-2629</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention BPM Delivers Better Practices and Best Practices -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/10/02/bpm-delivers-better-practices-and-best-practices/#comment-2629</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gagan Saxena and Jim Sinur. Jim Sinur said: When is &quot;better&quot; best? #BPM http://bit.ly/28vwFV [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gagan Saxena and Jim Sinur. Jim Sinur said: When is &quot;better&quot; best? #BPM <a href="http://bit.ly/28vwFV" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/28vwFV</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gagan Saxena</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/10/02/bpm-delivers-better-practices-and-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-2628</link>
		<dc:creator>Gagan Saxena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/10/02/bpm-delivers-better-practices-and-best-practices/#comment-2628</guid>
		<description>Business agility is key today and I agree that it is better to get into production with something that works and evolve from there. BPMS&#039; allow this to happen without risk of application lock-in and I am a fan of that approach. 

The only issue that I see is that BPMS&#039; are one half of the solution - giving IT and some savvy Biz Users a lot of advantage, but not directly addressing the need to change business rules rapidly and easily. In a perfect world, a Business Rules Management (BRMS) needs to be the other part of the solution. I have seen quite a bit of the either/or debate between BPMS&#039; and BRMS&#039; and fail to see why that is even a question. 

@gagan_s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Business agility is key today and I agree that it is better to get into production with something that works and evolve from there. BPMS&#8217; allow this to happen without risk of application lock-in and I am a fan of that approach. </p>
<p>The only issue that I see is that BPMS&#8217; are one half of the solution &#8211; giving IT and some savvy Biz Users a lot of advantage, but not directly addressing the need to change business rules rapidly and easily. In a perfect world, a Business Rules Management (BRMS) needs to be the other part of the solution. I have seen quite a bit of the either/or debate between BPMS&#8217; and BRMS&#8217; and fail to see why that is even a question. </p>
<p>@gagan_s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

