<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Applications or Processes: Which Comes First, the Chicken or the Egg?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/08/19/applications-or-processes-which-comes-first-the-chicken-or-the-egg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/08/19/applications-or-processes-which-comes-first-the-chicken-or-the-egg/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:21:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avigdor Luttinger</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/08/19/applications-or-processes-which-comes-first-the-chicken-or-the-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-2046</link>
		<dc:creator>Avigdor Luttinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/08/19/applications-or-processes-which-comes-first-the-chicken-or-the-egg/#comment-2046</guid>
		<description>The symbyosis of Applications and Processes is in my view a natural state - as usual, the issue is prompted more due to technology limitations than to the core functionality. A year ago, BPM vendor W4 acquired Lyria, who had a Model Driven Application Development tool, in order to enrich their BPMS with strong application capabilities. A few ISV&#039;s I know embed BPM in their application packages, increasing the dynamic nature of their solutions and simplifying their maintenance. It&#039;s certainly the direction of the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The symbyosis of Applications and Processes is in my view a natural state &#8211; as usual, the issue is prompted more due to technology limitations than to the core functionality. A year ago, BPM vendor W4 acquired Lyria, who had a Model Driven Application Development tool, in order to enrich their BPMS with strong application capabilities. A few ISV&#8217;s I know embed BPM in their application packages, increasing the dynamic nature of their solutions and simplifying their maintenance. It&#8217;s certainly the direction of the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Djebar Hammouche</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/08/19/applications-or-processes-which-comes-first-the-chicken-or-the-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-2031</link>
		<dc:creator>Djebar Hammouche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/08/19/applications-or-processes-which-comes-first-the-chicken-or-the-egg/#comment-2031</guid>
		<description>somme comment
   Pro Applications Processes,  issued from Application are the top of iceberg &#039;s enterprise processes. Most enterprise value provider  process are in inside this  iceberg.
From examples,  rarely KM processes or Case Managements or decisions  process are implemented in applications/IT systems (except theirs results !).
Issued from my experiences, Pro applications  strategy, which in fact an IT system approach,  will finished in most case with an titanic effect. 
Other approach issued from Business Proccess Professionnals  have an risk of balkanization effect.
I agrree with you, an good agile method practice is the cooperation between BP profeesionnal and IT system people. 
From my experience,  this elicitation/discovery  make each participant an Indiana Jones : extract parcel of truth from legacy applications. One useful hint : when IT system are down, just ask to the businnes team what tasks/activities they do to make theirs works. To resume, sometimes exceptions scenarios  context will provide more informations/BP elements than normal scenarios (eg. Business/IT mis-alignment)

About UI, i remember this sentence : UI, moeover User experience,  is the the only  architecture perspective understanding by Businnes People.  

best reagards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>somme comment<br />
   Pro Applications Processes,  issued from Application are the top of iceberg &#8216;s enterprise processes. Most enterprise value provider  process are in inside this  iceberg.<br />
From examples,  rarely KM processes or Case Managements or decisions  process are implemented in applications/IT systems (except theirs results !).<br />
Issued from my experiences, Pro applications  strategy, which in fact an IT system approach,  will finished in most case with an titanic effect.<br />
Other approach issued from Business Proccess Professionnals  have an risk of balkanization effect.<br />
I agrree with you, an good agile method practice is the cooperation between BP profeesionnal and IT system people.<br />
From my experience,  this elicitation/discovery  make each participant an Indiana Jones : extract parcel of truth from legacy applications. One useful hint : when IT system are down, just ask to the businnes team what tasks/activities they do to make theirs works. To resume, sometimes exceptions scenarios  context will provide more informations/BP elements than normal scenarios (eg. Business/IT mis-alignment)</p>
<p>About UI, i remember this sentence : UI, moeover User experience,  is the the only  architecture perspective understanding by Businnes People.  </p>
<p>best reagards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

