<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do You Really Need Technology to Improve Processes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/07/07/do-you-really-need-technology-to-improve-processes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/07/07/do-you-really-need-technology-to-improve-processes/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:21:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bogner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/07/07/do-you-really-need-technology-to-improve-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bogner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/07/07/do-you-really-need-technology-to-improve-processes/#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>In some companies, the processes are so bad that you can do quite a bit of improvement without any technology at all. I think you do get to a ceiling, though, above which you really need technology to get additional gains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some companies, the processes are so bad that you can do quite a bit of improvement without any technology at all. I think you do get to a ceiling, though, above which you really need technology to get additional gains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Sinur</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/07/07/do-you-really-need-technology-to-improve-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-1662</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Sinur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/07/07/do-you-really-need-technology-to-improve-processes/#comment-1662</guid>
		<description>Thanks  for your comment. I am very familiar with combination of lean and six sigma. The DMIAC approach is common in manufacturing. There are other apporaches that can lean to similar results. Some folks are very attached to the Rummler Brache aporrach and others use an extended variant of Information Engineering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks  for your comment. I am very familiar with combination of lean and six sigma. The DMIAC approach is common in manufacturing. There are other apporaches that can lean to similar results. Some folks are very attached to the Rummler Brache aporrach and others use an extended variant of Information Engineering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Lennarz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/07/07/do-you-really-need-technology-to-improve-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-1661</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Lennarz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/07/07/do-you-really-need-technology-to-improve-processes/#comment-1661</guid>
		<description>Jim,

The Lean Six Sigma methodology provides a good framework for looking at process improvement.  Lean is all about eliminiating waste, reducing errors, and streamlining processes, typically without any technology; while Six Sigma can provide a model to identify defects, their root causes, and potential solutions, including automating processes.  In that context, Lean is about process improvement without technology, and Six Sigma includes automating processes with technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>The Lean Six Sigma methodology provides a good framework for looking at process improvement.  Lean is all about eliminiating waste, reducing errors, and streamlining processes, typically without any technology; while Six Sigma can provide a model to identify defects, their root causes, and potential solutions, including automating processes.  In that context, Lean is about process improvement without technology, and Six Sigma includes automating processes with technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Castellucci</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/07/07/do-you-really-need-technology-to-improve-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-1656</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Castellucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/07/07/do-you-really-need-technology-to-improve-processes/#comment-1656</guid>
		<description>While I agree 100% that you can seriously accomplish significant gains in process improvement, to dismiss technology except for BPM technology seems, well, naive.

Let&#039;s get primitive. Email is a technology that can positively expedite  the hand offs between activities, especially if the &quot;as-is&quot; has people getting up from their desk and walking up a flight of stairs to deliver a purchase order!

Technology is here and should be utilized in whatever form makes sense when developing the &quot;to-be&quot; model. To discard it from the solution would be irresponsible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree 100% that you can seriously accomplish significant gains in process improvement, to dismiss technology except for BPM technology seems, well, naive.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get primitive. Email is a technology that can positively expedite  the hand offs between activities, especially if the &#8220;as-is&#8221; has people getting up from their desk and walking up a flight of stairs to deliver a purchase order!</p>
<p>Technology is here and should be utilized in whatever form makes sense when developing the &#8220;to-be&#8221; model. To discard it from the solution would be irresponsible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Ukelson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/07/07/do-you-really-need-technology-to-improve-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-1652</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Ukelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/07/07/do-you-really-need-technology-to-improve-processes/#comment-1652</guid>
		<description>Jim,
  I think it is the difference between being able to incremently improve your process (something that can, and should be done with no technology), and the ability to fundamentally change your processes, how you think about them and how they are handled. 

Adopting the appropriate process technologies enables companies to start thinking about their processes in new ways - and I am sure some of that thinking will enable business breakthroughs - something that an incremental approach usually lacks. In the meantime they benefit from more efficient approachs to their current processes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,<br />
  I think it is the difference between being able to incremently improve your process (something that can, and should be done with no technology), and the ability to fundamentally change your processes, how you think about them and how they are handled. </p>
<p>Adopting the appropriate process technologies enables companies to start thinking about their processes in new ways &#8211; and I am sure some of that thinking will enable business breakthroughs &#8211; something that an incremental approach usually lacks. In the meantime they benefit from more efficient approachs to their current processes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

