<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scenario Planning is No Longer Optional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:06:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-1700</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/#comment-1700</guid>
		<description>Those lucky firms that entered the economic recession in a relatively strong position may enjoy the freedom to now engage in long-term strategic planning a la scenarios. But for the majority of firms not as fortunate, the temptation is to &quot;hunker down&quot; in a nearly perfectly reactive mode, waiting for the market to turn up or for the fog to at least lift a little.  I believe there is a valuable middle ground between the two extremes:  Using 1-3 year mini-scenarios to evaluate risks, stress-test current plans, prioritize decisions and, yes, identify opportunities ahead of the competition. The idea is not to predict whether we&#039;re headed to a U-shaped recovery or a L-shaped stagnation or any other variant...but rather to rigorously explore all plausible short- to medium-term outcomes for the economy and all meaningful sectors within it.  Take all these plausible &quot;futures&quot; seriously.  Think hard about how each scenario challenges (or reaffirms) your current plans and direction.  Find common threads and elements and let them inform how you act.  Most importantly, make this a senior leadership exercise, so everyone &quot;gets it&quot; and feels ownership over the result (that may make many feel uncomfortable, in a healthy kind of way).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those lucky firms that entered the economic recession in a relatively strong position may enjoy the freedom to now engage in long-term strategic planning a la scenarios. But for the majority of firms not as fortunate, the temptation is to &#8220;hunker down&#8221; in a nearly perfectly reactive mode, waiting for the market to turn up or for the fog to at least lift a little.  I believe there is a valuable middle ground between the two extremes:  Using 1-3 year mini-scenarios to evaluate risks, stress-test current plans, prioritize decisions and, yes, identify opportunities ahead of the competition. The idea is not to predict whether we&#8217;re headed to a U-shaped recovery or a L-shaped stagnation or any other variant&#8230;but rather to rigorously explore all plausible short- to medium-term outcomes for the economy and all meaningful sectors within it.  Take all these plausible &#8220;futures&#8221; seriously.  Think hard about how each scenario challenges (or reaffirms) your current plans and direction.  Find common threads and elements and let them inform how you act.  Most importantly, make this a senior leadership exercise, so everyone &#8220;gets it&#8221; and feels ownership over the result (that may make many feel uncomfortable, in a healthy kind of way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Isn&#8217;t Strategy a Bad Word in Down Times?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-1628</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Isn&#8217;t Strategy a Bad Word in Down Times?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/#comment-1628</guid>
		<description>[...] http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intelligent Decisions Go Beyond the Normal Ups and Downs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-1552</link>
		<dc:creator>Intelligent Decisions Go Beyond the Normal Ups and Downs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/#comment-1552</guid>
		<description>[...] http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chat sohbet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>chat sohbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I have to comment on that too- what was with the wall?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I have to comment on that too- what was with the wall?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul McMenamin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-1342</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul McMenamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/#comment-1342</guid>
		<description>It all rings true in hindsight. is it that those who practice effective scenario planning do so making effective decisions and moving forward, but not publicizing the fact. And others have tried and been unsuccessful for any number of reasons abandon the practice and look for something else. 

Are the current practitioners reluctant to make it known about their use, as they find it too advantageous? Are those who provide feeble responses plainly unaware of the possible benefit, or just don&#039;t have the time. This looks like they can&#039;t &quot;sharpen the saw&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all rings true in hindsight. is it that those who practice effective scenario planning do so making effective decisions and moving forward, but not publicizing the fact. And others have tried and been unsuccessful for any number of reasons abandon the practice and look for something else. </p>
<p>Are the current practitioners reluctant to make it known about their use, as they find it too advantageous? Are those who provide feeble responses plainly unaware of the possible benefit, or just don&#8217;t have the time. This looks like they can&#8217;t &#8220;sharpen the saw&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Processes Enable Early Warning for Emerging Business Scenarios</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>Processes Enable Early Warning for Emerging Business Scenarios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>[...] scenarios that have well thought out responses that may leverage policy and rule changes (see http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/). Organization might have probes into market indices and watch the behaviors of customers, partners [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scenarios that have well thought out responses that may leverage policy and rule changes (see <a href="http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/)" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/)</a>. Organization might have probes into market indices and watch the behaviors of customers, partners [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Gordon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/#comment-1251</guid>
		<description>Totally agree. Problem in widespread scenario planning adoption has been poor quality, particularly in mixing up visionary (desired) scenario building and what-could-actually-happen scenario building. This is part of a bigger problem of mixing up future-anticipating and future-influencing methods in thinking ahead. More on this in &quot;Future Savvy,&quot; Amacom Press, 2009 http://tinyurl.com/5mdu2c  http://www.futuresavvy.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. Problem in widespread scenario planning adoption has been poor quality, particularly in mixing up visionary (desired) scenario building and what-could-actually-happen scenario building. This is part of a bigger problem of mixing up future-anticipating and future-influencing methods in thinking ahead. More on this in &#8220;Future Savvy,&#8221; Amacom Press, 2009 <a href="http://tinyurl.com/5mdu2c" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/5mdu2c</a>  <a href="http://www.futuresavvy.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.futuresavvy.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scenario Testing, Stress Testing and Decision Management &#187; JT on EDM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Scenario Testing, Stress Testing and Decision Management &#187; JT on EDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>[...] management was one of my predictions for 2009 and Jim Sinur wrote a nice piece on this too - Scenario Planning is No Longer Optional.   This entry was posted on Thursday, January 15th, 2009 at 2:25 pm and written by James Taylor. It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] management was one of my predictions for 2009 and Jim Sinur wrote a nice piece on this too &#8211; Scenario Planning is No Longer Optional.   This entry was posted on Thursday, January 15th, 2009 at 2:25 pm and written by James Taylor. It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Taylor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>James Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/#comment-905</guid>
		<description>Interesting post Jim and I completely agree
Check out http://www.ebizq.net/blogs/decision_management/2009/01/scenario_testing_stress_testin.php for my POV

JT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Jim and I completely agree<br />
Check out <a href="http://www.ebizq.net/blogs/decision_management/2009/01/scenario_testing_stress_testin.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.ebizq.net/blogs/decision_management/2009/01/scenario_testing_stress_testin.php</a> for my POV</p>
<p>JT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Sinur</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Sinur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_sinur/2009/01/02/scenario-planning-is-no-longer-optional/#comment-878</guid>
		<description>There are a number of ana;ytical approaches to abstract complexity including simulation and other optimization forms. I like your approach as a front line approach with the addition of other back stops. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a number of ana;ytical approaches to abstract complexity including simulation and other optimization forms. I like your approach as a front line approach with the addition of other back stops. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
