<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jim Lundy &#187; Collaboration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_lundy/tag/collaboration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_lundy</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:59:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Defining Collaboration &#8211; again.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_lundy/2009/06/22/defining-collaboration-again/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_lundy/2009/06/22/defining-collaboration-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lundy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coordination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Interaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_lundy/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Collaboration is a hot topic these days and it is a top priority, according to Gartner&#8217;s recent survey of CIOs where Collaboration technologies ranked number 5 on the priority list. The problem is that some people get confused when the word collaboration is used. Here is Gartner&#8217;s definition of Collaboration from a research note that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Collaboration is a hot topic these days and it is a top priority, according to Gartner&#8217;s recent <a href="http://www.gartner.com/resources/165000/165048/executive_summary_meeting_th_165048.pdf" target="_blank">survey</a> of CIOs where Collaboration technologies ranked number 5 on the priority list. The problem is that some people get confused when the word collaboration is used. Here is Gartner&#8217;s definition of Collaboration from a research note that <a href="http://www.gartner.com/AnalystBiography?authorId=6540" target="_blank">Tom Austin</a> and <a href="http://www.gartner.com/AnalystBiography?authorId=6770" target="_blank">Betsy Burton</a> wrote a few years back:</p>
<p><em><strong>Collaboration: work with others on a nonroutine cognitive task — that is, working </strong><span style="font-style: normal"><em><strong>together.</strong></em> </span></em></p>
<p>In a related research note, Tom Austin defined the four elements of Collaboration:<a href="http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?id=507486" target="_blank"> Segment Collaboration into its Four Main Constituents for Maximum Return</a>. The elements are:</p>
<ol>
<li>Communication</li>
<li>Coordination</li>
<li>Communities</li>
<li>Social Interaction Facilitation</li>
</ol>
<p>In 2009, everyone says they offer collaboration technologies, but not everyone defines collaboration or communication the same way. It used to be a simple world when phones were separate from computers. That is not the case in 2009 and that is where part of the problem is. Knowing how you want to collaborate and what technologies you want to use will keep you pointed in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_lundy/2009/06/22/defining-collaboration-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
