<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oracle Fusion Applications: How Real Are They?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_holincheck/2009/10/15/oracle-fusion-applications-how-real-are-they/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_holincheck/2009/10/15/oracle-fusion-applications-how-real-are-they/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:20:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_holincheck/2009/10/15/oracle-fusion-applications-how-real-are-they/comment-page-1/#comment-2077</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_holincheck/?p=452#comment-2077</guid>
		<description>It sounds like a fantastic step forward for ERP in general. From the vague reports available it seems fusion apps is a re-write; one in which design ideas rather than actual technology components are brought in from the legacy applications(PeopleSoft, JDE, Siebel and Oracle EBS). This is a great approach, but it will be interesting to see what the details are. 

For example - there has been a lot of discussion of social networking tools and embedded BI, but what about the core applications? For example for HCM (which is supposed to be mainly based on PeopleSoft) what components of PeopleSoft Global Payroll or Time &amp; Labor (both products which are leaders in the ERP space) will be brought in. What will core HRMS look like. These are the foundation components of an ERP, and if these are not solid and tightly integrated the new enhancements will be a distraction.

http://www.seanfcarroll.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like a fantastic step forward for ERP in general. From the vague reports available it seems fusion apps is a re-write; one in which design ideas rather than actual technology components are brought in from the legacy applications(PeopleSoft, JDE, Siebel and Oracle EBS). This is a great approach, but it will be interesting to see what the details are. </p>
<p>For example &#8211; there has been a lot of discussion of social networking tools and embedded BI, but what about the core applications? For example for HCM (which is supposed to be mainly based on PeopleSoft) what components of PeopleSoft Global Payroll or Time &amp; Labor (both products which are leaders in the ERP space) will be brought in. What will core HRMS look like. These are the foundation components of an ERP, and if these are not solid and tightly integrated the new enhancements will be a distraction.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seanfcarroll.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.seanfcarroll.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle Fusion - a damp squib &#124; Irregular Enterprise &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_holincheck/2009/10/15/oracle-fusion-applications-how-real-are-they/comment-page-1/#comment-2072</link>
		<dc:creator>Oracle Fusion - a damp squib &#124; Irregular Enterprise &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jim_holincheck/?p=452#comment-2072</guid>
		<description>[...] seriously though - millions of dev dollars later is Oracle still stuck? In response to my goading, Jim updated his position as follows: There is a firmer delivery date (sometime in 2010).  We also know that some customers have been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seriously though &#8211; millions of dev dollars later is Oracle still stuck? In response to my goading, Jim updated his position as follows: There is a firmer delivery date (sometime in 2010).  We also know that some customers have been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

