by Jenny Sussin | January 19, 2017 | Comments Off on There Is No “Privacy” When It Comes to Social Media
A social analytics vendor that I’ve spent time covering over the years had come under fire last year for what was being referred to as “citizen surveillance.” They’ve definitely suffered the consequences, but I still can’t help but be baffled that people don’t realize that what they’re sharing is on a public forum.
I’ll be completely honest with you – and many of you know me personally so this won’t be all too surprising – those briefings from that vendor were always my favorite. I could NOT believe what people not only shared publicly but then they #hashtagged it and geo-tagged it. CRIMES! I’m talking about full on breaking of the law: posing with stacks of money, drugs and guns that were being tagged, by the person, “#money #drugs #guns” and all I could think was #butwhytho?
I was speaking with a vendor this morning who made an interesting point in the course of talking about the data they’re collecting from social networks: a single “like” on a piece of content could generate 100 data points. One hundred different things, that organizations are searching for on social media, could trigger alerts based on your one, off-handed “like.” Cue Hall and Oates…
Now to give social networks credit, they’re trying to help you a bit. Twitter and Facebook jumped into action when the ACLU went after the aforementioned vendors for violating citizen rights by cutting off access to their feeds. Facebook got rid of its public profile API so now organizations only see “trend” data…aggregate, anonymized data. LinkedIn only allows access to your profile data and activity if an organization is willing to pay for it through one of their enterprise apps for sales or recruiting purposes – and now they’re doing trend data a la Facebook as well.
So what are consumers to do? Well, some of them use messaging apps as their primary means of engagement to try and get some privacy, but the Iggy Azalea/Nick Young/D’Angelo Russell Snapchat saga and the “Texts From Your Ex” Instagram account (way too inappropriate for me to share) show that “privacy” these days would mean going completely off the grid a la Ron Swanson.
What’s the lesson here? Choose your friends wisely. Be just as selective about your activity on social media as you are in person. Set your social media profiles to “private” if you want them to be private. And remember: the internet isn’t free.
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Predicts 2017: Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence is changing the way in which organizations innovate and communicate their processes, products and services. Practical...
View Relevant Webinars
How to Live Without Mobile Device Management
This webinar addresses the growing trend of users refusing to have enterprise management of their mobile devices due to privacy concerns....
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.