<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Potential Business Model for Facebook II?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:44:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Mann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure, Coffee. I tend not to believe in conspiracy theories. It could be that the intense backlash made them decide that the change wasn&#039;t worth it, no matter what their intentions were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure, Coffee. I tend not to believe in conspiracy theories. It could be that the intense backlash made them decide that the change wasn&#8217;t worth it, no matter what their intentions were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coffee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>coffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>the fact that Facebook change their TOS back so quickly is an indication that they knew they were wrong in the first place</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the fact that Facebook change their TOS back so quickly is an indication that they knew they were wrong in the first place</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Allega</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Allega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Corporate implications abound...

Consider a furtherance of this supposition for a potential future corporation.

LONDON - 19 Feb 2025

In a related report, Facebook II announced the purchase of data and associated transactions for BigCo, a current Fortune 100 company who has used the Facebook platform since its inception in 2008.  Emails, multimedia, corporate secrets, presentations, sales information, client connections, supplier relationships - all were accesible to BigCo employees on the Facebook platform.  An insider reports that the undisclosed payoff to Facebook II was &quot;very large and painful&quot;. A BigCo spokesperson has refused comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corporate implications abound&#8230;</p>
<p>Consider a furtherance of this supposition for a potential future corporation.</p>
<p>LONDON &#8211; 19 Feb 2025</p>
<p>In a related report, Facebook II announced the purchase of data and associated transactions for BigCo, a current Fortune 100 company who has used the Facebook platform since its inception in 2008.  Emails, multimedia, corporate secrets, presentations, sales information, client connections, supplier relationships &#8211; all were accesible to BigCo employees on the Facebook platform.  An insider reports that the undisclosed payoff to Facebook II was &#8220;very large and painful&#8221;. A BigCo spokesperson has refused comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irregular Enterprise mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Irregular Enterprise mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>[...] businesses we all love to hate and will pillory at the first opportunity. Somewhat tongue in cheek, Gartner is already fictionalizing Facebook&#039;s future. Others spring to mind like our friends up in Redmond aka Microsoft. Goodness knows how much [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] businesses we all love to hate and will pillory at the first opportunity. Somewhat tongue in cheek, Gartner is already fictionalizing Facebook&#8217;s future. Others spring to mind like our friends up in Redmond aka Microsoft. Goodness knows how much [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>And they changed it back anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And they changed it back anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Mann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>BTW, before someone points it out, I know that patents aren&#039;t generally valid for that long a period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, before someone points it out, I know that patents aren&#8217;t generally valid for that long a period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/jeffrey_mann/2009/02/18/a-potential-business-model-for-facebook-ii/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>A dystopian, but not unrealistic, prediction of what the changes in the ToS might cause. 

Nice one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A dystopian, but not unrealistic, prediction of what the changes in the ToS might cause. </p>
<p>Nice one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

