<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social-media-phobes note, even Email was &#8216;over hyped&#8217; once</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/hypecyclebook/2009/04/21/social-media-phobes-note-even-email-was-over-hyped-once/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/hypecyclebook/2009/04/21/social-media-phobes-note-even-email-was-over-hyped-once/</link>
	<description>How to Choose the Right Innovation at the Right Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:50:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Raskino</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/hypecyclebook/2009/04/21/social-media-phobes-note-even-email-was-over-hyped-once/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Raskino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/hypecyclebook/?p=578#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Anthony - I agree. In the book we list hype cycle variants including the &#039;high flyer&#039;, where the eventual value expectations level of the plateau is higher than the initial hype peak. Web search might be another example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony &#8211; I agree. In the book we list hype cycle variants including the &#8216;high flyer&#8217;, where the eventual value expectations level of the plateau is higher than the initial hype peak. Web search might be another example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Bradley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/hypecyclebook/2009/04/21/social-media-phobes-note-even-email-was-over-hyped-once/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/hypecyclebook/?p=578#comment-414</guid>
		<description>I might argue that is was under hyped considering its incredible penetration, over use, and culturally addictive characteristics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might argue that is was under hyped considering its incredible penetration, over use, and culturally addictive characteristics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Raskino</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/hypecyclebook/2009/04/21/social-media-phobes-note-even-email-was-over-hyped-once/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Raskino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/hypecyclebook/?p=578#comment-386</guid>
		<description>Timo - thanks for your comment. What examples do you have in mind?
There certainly are some complete failures, but fewer than people think. Most major technologies that get any serious hype exposure just take a lot longer to come good than people expect (sometimes many years) Things can spend quite a long time in the trough.
That&#039;s really a key management value insight of the Hype Cycle - to help people in the adopting (buying and applying) organisations work out  the *real* time-frame.
For example - PDAs with handwriting recognition came (1992) and went (1995) in the form of the Apple Newton. They then spent 3 years in the trough until the arrival of the Palm Pilot in 1998.
We have a particular symbol (a crossed circle) we use in our published cycles. It&#039;s used if the Gartner analyst predicts the technology will &#039;fall off&#039; and won&#039;t get to the plateau of productivity. It&#039;s surprising how infrequently is it used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timo &#8211; thanks for your comment. What examples do you have in mind?<br />
There certainly are some complete failures, but fewer than people think. Most major technologies that get any serious hype exposure just take a lot longer to come good than people expect (sometimes many years) Things can spend quite a long time in the trough.<br />
That&#8217;s really a key management value insight of the Hype Cycle &#8211; to help people in the adopting (buying and applying) organisations work out  the *real* time-frame.<br />
For example &#8211; PDAs with handwriting recognition came (1992) and went (1995) in the form of the Apple Newton. They then spent 3 years in the trough until the arrival of the Palm Pilot in 1998.<br />
We have a particular symbol (a crossed circle) we use in our published cycles. It&#8217;s used if the Gartner analyst predicts the technology will &#8216;fall off&#8217; and won&#8217;t get to the plateau of productivity. It&#8217;s surprising how infrequently is it used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timo Elliott</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/hypecyclebook/2009/04/21/social-media-phobes-note-even-email-was-over-hyped-once/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Timo Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/hypecyclebook/?p=578#comment-385</guid>
		<description>To be fair, there are also a plethora of over-hyped technologies that didn&#039;t make it... (although social media is not one of them)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, there are also a plethora of over-hyped technologies that didn&#8217;t make it&#8230; (although social media is not one of them)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

