Transparency is all well and good in theory, but in practice here is how it works:
First the auditors want to know if we have the required device to measure time, so we show them that we have a watch:
but then the auditors tell us we have to have more detail, so we show them that the watch face has numbers and a minute and an hour hand,
then they tell us it has to have even more accuracy, so we add a second hand,
and then they want to know how it is that we can know that the watch is really reliable down to the second, so we remove the face plate to provide tranasparency to all the complex gearing inside,
— and then they hit us with a significant deficiency because they can’t tell what time it is.
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Predicts 2017: Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence is changing the way in which organizations innovate and communicate their processes, products and services. Practical...
View Relevant Webinars
How to Live Without Mobile Device Management
This webinar addresses the growing trend of users refusing to have enterprise management of their mobile devices due to privacy concerns....
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.